Explore the Category
By Donald Dinnie on April 30, 2015 Posted in Insurance The driver of a security vehicle was awarded damages against his employer for injuries he sustained in a hijacking because he did not have the promised bullet proof glass windscreen.
We make no apologies for repeating what we have said in previous blog posts about how contracts are interpreted. Old habits with emphasis on the words used are difficult to break.
A Louisiana court excused Lloyd’s of London and other insurers from a $7 million claim for the second of two storms, finding that the deductible of $10 million per occurrence applied.
Do you think short-term insurance broking will survive the AI plus humanoid robotics age?