France takes the lead as top G20 market for renewable energy investments

12 December 2018 The Allianz Group

• Allianz Climate and Energy Monitor 2018: European countries most attractive for investing in renewable energy, with China, India and Brazil in top 10. South Africa maintains the 12th spot Still, lack of long-term strategies for renewable energy in most
G20 countries
• G20 countries need to invest USD 886 billion annually in power sector to meet Paris climate goals

Most G20 countries including several emerging countries have enhanced their conditions for investments in low-carbon energy in the past year. Nonetheless, more renewable energy investments have to be undertaken in order to meet the Paris climate targets.
In addition, the G20 would need to develop and implement more ambitious, consistent and transparent long-term strategies to improve the investment climate for renewable energies. These are the key findings of the Allianz Climate and Energy Monitor 2018.

For the third year, Allianz, German watch and New Climate Institute examined the investment climate and investments made for renewable energy in all G20 countries. “The development of the renewable energy sector is crucial for meeting the climate goals of the Paris Agreement,” says Katharina Latif, Head of Corporate Responsibility of Allianz Group. “These challenges can only be tackled by joint efforts of engaged governments, companies and civil society.”

According to the 2018 report, South Africa has maintained its renewable energy capacity in the last year and has a relatively high presence of leading renewable energy business. The country’s ranking remains unchanged in the twelfth place.

Top group leads the way

France climbed two positions to the top, while Germany and the United Kingdom (UK) dropped to second and third place respectively. The top three currently provide the best policy and market environments, which are pivotal criteria for long-term investments and complex projects such as solar and wind farms. "Renewable energies in France, Germany and the UK are benefiting from good market and investment conditions in general as well as from a largely positive political environment. However, there are still weaknesses even in the best-performing countries: France's tenders for new plants, for example, do not have enough bidders, Germany’s investment in wind will drop due to new auctioning rules, and the solar energy market in the UK has collapsed following political reforms," says Professor Niklas Höhne, Managing director of the NewClimate Institute. Top improvements were shown this year by Brazil and Italy, both reaching significantly higher ranks than last year. Over the last year, Brazil has notably increased its solar photovoltaic capacity additions, growing at a rate similar to other emerging economies like India, Turkey and China.

China, India and US have highest investment needs

The US have fallen by two ranks to ninth position as a result of policy changes, cutting down the federal support for renewable energy policies. As a result, the number of new wind and solar installations has declined in 2017. In that period, the US invested USD 57 billion in renewable energy, only a third of the required capital of USD 158 billion to align to the goals of the Paris agreement. For comparison: The fifth placed China invested with USD 133 billion more than twice as much in 2017, but also here the demand is distinctly higher with required annually USD 314 billion in the power sector. In India, on position ten, the expansion of solar energy doubled, while wind power also rose. However, with investments of USD 11 billion in renewable energy in the last year, India has so far only reached a minimum of the required USD 160 billion per year to meet the climate targets in the power sector. The report says while South Africa has a well-structured auctioning design, political uncertainty remains the country’s Achilles’ heel.

Only UK has long-term strategy of decarbonisation

Only a few G20 countries follow a strategy of full decarbonisation for the power sector. Almost all G20 countries (except the US) have agreed to limit their CO2-emissions to net-zero by 2050, but only the UK has passed a binding and ambitious long-term plan to Decarbonise its power system. However, even the UK has not developed short-term renewable energy targets. Only Brazil, France and Germany have short-term renewable targets in place, which ramp up renewables fast enough to be in line with what is requested by the Paris Agreement.

South Africa, a country significantly dependent on carbon-emitting sectors of the economy, is in crucial need of a decarbonisation strategy. Nevertheless, the notably poor skills profile of the workforce, inflexibilities in the labour market, and the structure of the economy inhibit South Africa’s ability to deep decarbonise.

However, the Monitor finds that all countries show room for improvement for their policy framework to provide excellent investment conditions for renewables. “The question is not whether countries implement policies but how exactly they implement them,” says co-author Jan Burck from Germanwatch. The main challenges include

• On-and-off policy support,
• Sub-optimal enforcement of a support policy and
• Regressive policy design.

Important role of long-term investors

Insurance companies can play a crucial role in renewable energy projects, possessing the necessary risk management expertise as well as being well-capitalized investors with a long-term investment perspective. Allianz is one of the first insurance companies to set itself long-term climate goals which are linked to the two-degree target of the Paris Climate Agreement and supporting the transition to a climate-friendly economy per example by financing renewable energies. By 2040, in a step by step process, Allianz will have phased out both its proprietary investments in coal-based business and its insurance coverage of such risks.


Quick Polls


The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) released a notice extending the CPD cycle for 2018 until 31 July 2019. What is your opinion on this?


I am relieved as it means that I have more time to catch up on those CPD hours and activities
Why should individuals be given more time when they had 12 months to comply
Instead of waiting for the last minute, I proactively implemented the necessary actions timeously and effectively
The regulator’s actions are questionable
A E fanews magazine
FAnews April 2019 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Differences aside… in the name of fairness
Advice… now more important than ever
COFI… is this a reason to be positive?
Cyber cover: One size does not fit all
The need for member education
Subscribe now