FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Tax
SUB CATEGORIES Tax | 

Update on income tax returns and assessment

23 January 2008 SARS

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has received a record of more than 3 million income tax returns as part of the 2007 Filing Season.

SARS can provide the following figures on the submission process as work in progress:

  • More than 75% (2.1 million) of returns submitted have been processed through a number of stages
  • Of the processed returns more 1.5 million have been assessed and where applicable, refunds were issued
  • Refunds to the value of R2.3billion have been issued to 632 000 taxpayers
  • About 880 000 returns are currently being processed and SARS expects that these will be assessed and finalized before the end of March 2008.

SARS also wants to remind taxpayers with outstanding returns that there are 8 days left during which they can electronically submit returns.

It is encouraging for SARS that more than 400 000 returns were submitted via the electronic filing facility – eFiling. This figure is more than 10 times higher than the number of eFiling users during the previous year of assessment and indicates growing public confidence in the electronic system. In total more than 1.1 million taxpayers have registered as eFiling users.

In order to use the electronic submission facility – http://www.sarsefiling.co.za/ – taxpayers must register as eFiling users before completing and submitting their returns. SARS will not allow further extensions and outstanding tax returns must be submitted by 31 January 2008 to avoid penalties.

It is also important to highlight that a small number of taxpayers have been or will be notified by SARS in writing that they need to re-submit a new tax return or provide further information for their original return to be assessed.

Since the beginning of this month SARS sent back new, blank income tax returns to some 440 000 taxpayers whose manual returns could not be processed further. About half of this number has been completed, returned to SARS and are being processed.

Introducing the new assessment process and the new income tax return placed new requirements on SARS, taxpayers and tax practitioners. Understandably, with projects of this magnitude and complexity, there are challenges for taxpayers, tax practitioners and our own staff. SARS is confident that these changes have laid a good platform to further simplify and improve the annual filing process.

SARS recognizes that it will take some time to reduce the margin of error in the process and we want to thank taxpayers and tax practitioners for their cooperation and patience.

There are also other factors that may delay the issuing of a refund.

The reasons include:

  • Incomplete returns – the return was not signed by the taxpayer; some mandatory fields where information were required were left blank (like personal details)
  • Data verification - information provided by the taxpayer on income earned or expenses claimed differs from other sources of information: banks, employer records, etc.
  • Outstanding or incorrect banking details - SARS is unable to issue refunds to more than 100 000 taxpayers because of incorrect bank account details. Due to the risk of fraud, affected taxpayers are requested to visit a SARS branch office with their ID to rectify bank details
  • Non-compliant taxpayers - if returns or taxes from previous years are outstanding, SARS will not issue a refund until the taxpayers provides outstanding information or settles outstanding tax debts
  • Risk rules - a number of returns are being subjected for further audit by SARS after being automatically selected by the risk rules of the new assessment process. In some instances letters were sent to taxpayers requesting further information or supporting documents

It is important that taxpayers who received letters from SARS visit a local branch office for assistance to correctly complete their returns. SARS will not impose penalties for late submission in such instances. Taxpayers should also note that both the SARS national call centre and the eFiling call centre are experiencing extraordinary high volumes of calls on certain days of the week.

However, SARS branch offices are prepared to handle all queries and will as far as possible attempt to deliver first time resolution to most of the outstanding issues. SARS branch offices will also be their hours of operation from Monday 28 January 2008.

Comments

Added by Handy Dodovu, 31 Jul 2019
I am from SARS the consultant said I should not submit my IRP3E of 2008.
Report Abuse
Added by Handy, 14 Jun 2019
Hi have struggled to obtain my irp5 from mineworkers provident fund now they sent me IRP3E could I fill it with SARS?
Report Abuse
Added by Handy, 14 Jun 2019
Hi have struggled to obtain my irp5 from mineworkers provident fund now they sent me IRP3E could I fill it with SARS?
Report Abuse
Added by JW, 24 Jan 2008
Another problem is that eFiling rejects or ignore all claims under travelling expenses and as a result of this all assessments with travel claims are incorrectly issued. According to SARS management the problem came under their attention in November 2007 and has been rectified in December 2007. I notified SARS that returns submitted on 12/01/2008 came back with incorrect assessments and that I am not submitting any further returns till the problem has been rectified. If the system does not work SARS will have no choice than to grant further extensions.
Report Abuse
Added by Johann , 24 Jan 2008
Ek het die volgende probleme ondervind. A. 3 opgawes wat ek namens kliente ingedien het se alle inkomstes is geignoreer en die persone is aangeslaan as n Nul inkomste.Die uitgawes is wel inberekening gebring.Alle belasting wat oorbetaal is aan Sars is aan die kliente terugbetaal.Ek moes die kliente waarku om nie hierdie terugbetaalde belasting as n geluk te beskou nie,want dit is totaal foutief.Ek het Sars opskrif inkennis gestel en wag op n heranslae. B .Waar die persoon geen inkomstes ontvang het waar n Irp 5 of n Irp3 tersprake kom nie maar ander inkomstes soos Rente,Tantieme ens is die opgawes teruggestuur as onvoltooid.Saam met die teruggestuurde opgawes was n nota dat alle kolomme wat nie van toepassing is nie, moet Nul ingevul word .Dit is lynreg die teenoorgesteldeis as Sars se voorskrifte wat saam met die oorspronklike opgawes uit gestuur was. C .Waar die persoon sy eie medies betaal is die opgawe teruggestuur en is die werkgewer se bydraes versoek. D. Waar die persoon glad nie aan n Mediese -Fonds behoort nie en vir homself werk ,en slegs mediese uitgawes geeis het,is die opgawes teruggestuur as onvoltooi en is versoek dat die premies wat hy self asook sy werkgewer i betaal het op die opgawe ingevul moet word. Ek dink die chaos ook by SARS is besig om tweede ESCOM te word.Die Munisipaliteite en Staatsdiens is oppad om dieselfde redes.Onbevoegtheid,geen insig,geen niks.Die indruk was dat by die vorigebedeling het alles vanself gewerk , die amptenare het niks gedoen en net vet salarisse ontvang.
Report Abuse
Added by GL, 24 Jan 2008
One of the most annoying reasons for rejections is the unclear wording on page 2 of the return, the block that reads “SITE & PAYE PAID” If the IRP 5 or the IT 3a that one received shows “nil” tax deducted (usually due to earnings being less than the tax threshold – reason 02) ….then in the past I have simply drawn a line through this section. But now S.A.R.S. requires the block to be filled in and a “Zero” entered in the SITE and PAYE blocks, failing which the form is returned to the taxpayer. Perhaps you should contact S.A.R.S. and suggest that next year, the heading should read “Details of IRP 5 / IT 3a forms received” – this will surely overcome any incorrect interpretation on the part of taxpayers and S.A.R.S. will have the information that they need.
Report Abuse

Comment on this post

Name*
Email Address*
Comment
Security Check *
   
Quick Polls

QUESTION

What do you think the high volume of inquiries and withdrawal requests means for the future of the two-pot system?

ANSWER

It suggests high demand and potential success of the system
It indicates possible problems with the system’s implementation or communication
It points to financial stress among individuals that could affect long-term retirement planning
It could be detrimental to the economy and people's retirement security
It’s too early to determine the impact on the system’s future
fanews magazine
FAnews August 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Women’s Month spotlight: emphasising people and growth in the workplace
The power of skills transfer and effective mentorship
Advisers and investors hold thumbs the GNU will restore bond and equity valuations
What are the primary concerns of insurers and brokers?
The Two-Pot System: regulatory challenges ahead
How comprehensive is your clients' critical illness cover?
Subscribe now