FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
SUB CATEGORIES Featured Story |  Straight Talk |  The Stage | 

Why TCF should be in your DNA

02 May 2013 Fiona Zerbst
Fiona Zerbst, FAnews Online Editor

Fiona Zerbst, FAnews Online Editor

An online article appearing in The Scotsman caught my eye as it suggested that DIY investing is booming globally because of a growing disconnection between the financial services industry and its clients. The worry for financial advisors, the article said

The article goes on to suggest that ordinary investors have been left out in the cold, fending for themselves, with some taking the drastic step of investing their pension monies online rather than pay exorbitant fees to advisors.

Surviving in a changing landscape

It was therefore interesting to hear what Sanlam UK’s Head of Investment Solutions, Rick Eling, had to say at Glacier by Sanlam’s regulatory seminar held in Johannesburg (and elsewhere around the country) this month. Eling suggested ways in which independent financial advisors (IFAs) can ‘survive’ RDR and TCF, acknowledging that the changes have met with some resistance and scepticism.

Some context is needed. Prior to RDR, consumers believed financial advice to be free. There was less need to explain what an advisor does, how much of the total fee goes to the advisor and what the ongoing service is. This is, however, vital post-RDR. It is not products that will drive an advisor’s pay, but service. Eling suggested advisors consider what that service is, and whether their clients know what it is.

All this is likely to sound familiar to advisors in South Africa, who will face the same challenges in the near future. It is TCF that will make all the difference to your clients, according to Eling, and you have to be acutely aware of how TCF outcomes will affect your business.

TCF in your DNA

“TCF is a cultural issue,” said Eling. “It is only through establishing the right culture that senior management can convert their good intentions into actual fair outcomes for consumers.” The cultural framework should encompass leadership, strategy, decision-making, controls, performance management and rewards.

Findings in the market reveal that most senior managers can explain TCF but intermediaries often fail to deliver the outcomes, largely because they lack guidance from senior management. Some employees are unwilling to challenge decisions that have arisen as a result of poorly applied TCF. Eling also said that incentive schemes don’t always include TCF and when they do it is given insufficient weight when weighed against other objectives.

He pointed out that advisors keen on RDR and TCF are invariably younger and well-qualified, and who have no problem with the idea of a fee-based model. Older advisors earning 90% of income from commission have obviously been far less enthusiastic. Some of the worries raised were criticism of fee levels and uncertainty about whether one could charge proportionately higher fees for lower-value clients.

Strategies for success

Eling said that, post-RDR, products don’t drive advisors’ pay – service does. There is therefore a greater necessity for understanding your client in depth, producing measurable results and, above all, communicating well. “Maximise face-time, use advice tools and employ ‘soft skills,” he suggested. “Report against objectives and relate outcomes to your client”.

Importantly, don’t use terms your client may not be comfortable with. For example, don’t say “Your portfolio gained 12% this year against a market average of 11%, with below-average volatility.” Say, “The money allocated to your retirement has grown by 12% this year. This is more than we expected for an average year and leaves your retirement plan well on track. When the markets had bad months, you never lost more than you would have expected.”

Eling identified seven important ‘rules’ to follow:

· Understand your client base.
· Understand the clients you would like to have in future.
· Define your offering – can you put it into one sentence?
· What will you do yourself? What will you outsource? And to whom?
· Which risk system will you use?
· Are you independent or restricted? Or hybrid? Why?
· TCF in everything, and mean it!

Editor’s thoughts:
TCF places advisors at a crossroads and it is interesting to see how the UK has been faring. Do you think we will face similar challenges here in South Africa, or are they likely to be somewhat different? Comment below or email fiona@news.co.za .

Comments

Added by Fiona Zerbst, 13 May 2013
Thanks, Brian. I see Warren Ingram has written something about the value of advice in Business Day today, if I'm not mistaken?
Report Abuse
Added by TCF Brian, 08 May 2013
Some useful comments in here Fiona. TCF is a waypoint on a bigger journey. The RDR situation in the UK is still a bit unclear in terms of the actual impact, but it is safe to say that the world has now changed completely. Those forward looking advisers that 'got' TCF initially (and early) and built sustainable businesses are thriving and RDR was actually something of a non-event. Those that chose to wait or haven't done it properly have found it much more difficult. I believe we are yet to see the real pain. I think the challenges here in South Africa (and indeed everywhere) are the same. Financial advisers have been paid for the distribution of products, when the value is in the advice (that may not even include products) and service. I think most advisers would say they deliver a service already - some more than others - but it is largely not well defined. I would argue the real value is in the ADVICE. And here is where it gets awkward. Some clients have very simple needs and situations and don't need a huge amount of advice. They don't need to pay large sums for advice that adds little value. Many of them probably could do simple things themselves. Others have very complex needs where advice is critical and this is where advisers can add tremendous value. When an adviser firm deliberately designs a client value proposition to meet a certain audience, it can tailor the service to meet the need, and then scale up or down the knowledge base required to deliver it. If you want to deliver complex advice and solutions to sophisticated clients, you need the skills and resources. If your client base is 20 somethings, it doesn't matter how well qualified or fantastic your service is, you wont be able to sell it at the rate you want to and people will say "I won't pay fees". What they are actually saying is "I won't pay you what you want to charge because I don't see the value for ME" The % of the population that needs advice pre and post RDR hasn't materially changed. What has changed is that the conversation has turned to value as a result of transparency. Those clients with sophisticated needs that try to DIY are going to get a shock when they haven't written a policy in trust properly, or their 'safe' investment falls by 20% overnight. The challenge for advisers is to articulate their value to the RIGHT clients. Banks etc have never had the skills or the ability to deliver the advice and service to the same audience. They have left the market because they realise they can't sell expensive complex products for high initial commissions any more without a value proposition. Perhaps that's a good thing for consumers? Sure, sell them simple risk products where they are needed or simple savings and investments, but stop telling people you are offering financial planning when you are not and stop telling people advice is free. There is a massive opportunity for forward thinking advisers to create sustainable, profitable businesses that deliver ADVICE and great service. The world needs it. In my experience the fees vs commission thing goes away when clients 'get' what you do and need it. Do it because it makes great sense, not under the threat of the regulation.
Report Abuse

Comment on this post

Name*
Email Address*
Comment
Security Check *
   
Quick Polls

QUESTION

How effective do you think technology is in improving compliance processes for FSPs?

ANSWER

Very effective – it streamlines and automates processes
Somewhat effective – helps but can't solve all issues
Not effective – technology can't replace proper oversight
fanews magazine
FAnews August 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Women’s Month spotlight: emphasising people and growth in the workplace
The power of skills transfer and effective mentorship
Advisers and investors hold thumbs the GNU will restore bond and equity valuations
What are the primary concerns of insurers and brokers?
The Two-Pot System: regulatory challenges ahead
How comprehensive is your clients' critical illness cover?
Subscribe now