orangeblock

Eight consumer protection rights

09 October 2009 | Talked About Features | Straight Talk | Gareth Stokes

The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) was signed into law by Kgalema Motlanthe (then President of South Africa) on 24 April 2009 and published in the government gazette on 29 April of the same year. The Act will be implemented in two phases and come into full

What do companies have to do to comply with the Act? We won’t know the exact obligations until regulations for the Act have been drafted. In the interim we’ll share a brief introduction to the Act as presented at the fifth AON Annual Health conference, held in Sandton on 29 September 2009. In her presentation titled Legislation and the Pending Environment, Esme Prins of Benguela Health discussed the Act and its implications for companies in the healthcare environment. We’ll focus on the eight consumer rights the Act is based on.

The “eight” consumer rights

The CPA is an extensive piece of legislation. “The act is applicable to any transaction, to any good being supplied, or service being performed,” said Prins. One of the interesting aspects of the Act is how it deals with conflicts. If an aspect is dealt with in more than one Act, then the CPA is written in such a way that the provisions in both Acts are complied with wherever possible. If this is not possible it urges compliance with one of the provisions without conflicting with the other. Failing that, says Prins, the Act favours “the provision extending the greater protection to the consumer!” There are eight consumer rights that are central to the Act. Each right (listed below) is described in detail in a section of the CPA. The consumer has:

· The right to equality – there are two main protections in this category. Suppliers of goods or services may not “unfairly” exclude people from access to goods or services, nor may they charge differentiated rates!

· The right to privacy – a consumer will be able to inform the marketer of particular goods or services that they no longer want to receive marketing communications. Any further approaches from the company will be a transgression of the CPA. The Act provides for a central registry where consumers can indicate their preference in this regard. Further provisions will regulate when direct marketers (specifically telemarketers) will be allowed to contact consumers at their homes.

· The right to choose – specific rights will be conferred on the consumer to allow them to ‘choose’ their supplier. This is a difficult concept to understand, but Prins used the example of a cell phone contract which mixes the purchase of a handset and the provision of airtime. The Act will also allow any fixed-term agreement to be cancelled with 20-days notice and will provide for ‘cool-off’ clauses in direct sales contracts.

· The right to disclosure of information

· The right to fair and responsible marketing – suppliers will have to comply with general standards for marketing. Loyalty programmes like Vitality, Voyager and e-Bucks will have to comply with separate regulations and will have to allow consumers to ‘access’ their rewards. Great news is that promotional competitions will also be regulated. Another provision of the Act is that the supplier will have to ensure the consumer can legally contract with it.

· The right to fair and honest dealings – this part of the Act combats unconscionable conduct such as force, coercion or undue influence by a supplier during the promotion, execution or enforcement of a contract. The Act will also outlaw pyramid schemes, chain letters and the like.

· The right to fair, just and reasonable terms and conditions – the Act prevents agreements that are one-sided against the consumer, adversely impact the consumer, or involve unfair or unreasonable waiving of rights, unjust terms or unreasonable prices! Terms and conditions will have to be in simple language – conspicuous and understandable! The Act absolutely prohibits the waiver of rights in terms of the Act, or the indemnifying of the supplier for gross negligence.

· The right to fair value, good quality and safety – consumers have the right to demand quality service!

Advice aspects remain under the FAIS Act

There are going to be a number of exemptions to the provisions in the Act. Among these are “goods and services promoted or supplied by the State,” said Prins. She added that juristic persons with an annual turnover that exceeded a ‘yet to be determined’ amount would be able to conduct business outside the Act. “Brokers fall under the FAIS Act, and therefore they are exempt,” said Prins. By the time the Act comes into full operation in October next year businesses will have no excuse for non-compliance. “Government is giving us time to change our operations and our practices in anticipation of the full implementation of the Act,” said Prins.

Editor’s thoughts: It’s going to be tough for businesses to comply with the provisions contained in the Consumer Protection Act. We welcome the regulation as a step towards forcing corporate South Africa to extend appropriate levels of service to their customers. Why should we accept the “take it or leave it” attitude entrenched at many of the country’s major companies. Will the CPA force banks and telecoms companies to treat their customers with more respect? Add your comments below, or send them to gareth@fanews.co.za

Comments

Added by Vusimuzi, 14 Sep 2017
I lost a job and I also reported to the shops that I owe that am no longer working but they threatens to blacklist me every day
Report Abuse
Added by Nino Jay, 12 Apr 2016
24HourMobility - This Service is the worst Ever
Report Abuse
Added by Nino Jay, 12 Apr 2016
24HourMobility - This Service is the worst Ever
Report Abuse
Added by Snazy , 07 Jun 2013
Hi, I have been behind my levies due to financial distress. I have made arrangements with the Managing Agent. I have failed to honour the first arrangement and they wrote to me warning to make other arrangement as the Body Corporate threatens to sell my property/possessions. The Body Corporate refused the arrangement and the lawyers informed me they will be proceeding with the sale of my possessions. Is this fair enough. Please help me too stressed.
Report Abuse
Added by Mahomed Majed, 03 May 2013
i bought a new car battery from Hi Q on 24 jan 2013.i recently started to have problems with this battery.I went back to Hi Q(29/04/2013) and they asked me to get the battery tested at another branch of theirs.The test results were that the battery was faulty and needed to be replaced. Then Hi Q sent me to battery Centre(another company) to resolve my issue.Battery Centre says that the battery is flat and needs to be charged for 3 days and if still faulty,they will replace me with new battery.Still waiting.What are my rights as a consumer.Do i have a option of asking HiQ for a complete refund for this defective battery supplied according to the consumer protection Act?
Report Abuse
Added by Emmarentia, 28 Nov 2012
A Company with the name of New Tech International contacted me to sell me some cleaning solution round about 26 April 2012 I received it started to use is but it was not suitable for use in my Company. I had a phone call again from them asking if they can send me some more so I declined ,the person calling me however never explained to me that I need to buy 3 more times of the cleaning stuff. Yesterday I received printer Cartridges from this same Company goods that I didn't order so I phone them today asking what is going on an the lady who phone me back said that it was the balance of my order I did not know that there were any kind of balance as it was not explained to me! When I told her that I will be sending back the goods she said that this in not how there Company is doing business and that I will be wasting my money because they will only send it back again. When I told them that I am going to contact the Consumer Protector she said be my guest you do not have a foot to stand on so how am I going to resolve this problem? regards Emmarentia
Report Abuse
Added by Nan, 21 Jul 2012
Hi im Nan in frm Eastern cape I and work in Polokwane .I bought a dining room suite at Bradlows on January on account due to their delivery delays I asked the manager to close the account and give me my money back but he refused.Went to a branch here in Polokwane and bought the goods cash but due to their squabbles polokwane ended up giving the account back to Butteworth.My problem nw is I made endless calls to get then to deliver n when they finally did end if June they send broken stuff.I'm tired of calling then and I see they like frustrating customers cause before this I bought a lounge set and they delivered wrong stuff when I enquired they did they dont manufacture those anymore but have them In their catalogues How do I handle this entire of that store and want my money back with interest of the months they kept it and they go take their incomplete goods.How and where do I go to get assistance .
Report Abuse
Added by Neo Maphoto, 07 Dec 2011
My Mother bought clothes at Mr Price as a gift for a third party who live in a different city to hers , third party was given receipt in case clothes were not fitting, she was chased from Mr Price which is in Pretoria because the account holder which is my Mother had to be present and issue card for exchange. I am appauled by this, to whom do I complain to and resolve the matter. Regards Neo
Report Abuse
Added by Peter, 03 Nov 2011
Good Day Do I have to pay for goods not recieved.I ordered books to be printed by a printing company but never recieved them.Now their attorneys are demanding payment for something I never recieved. They have summoned me to court,but if they cannot prove they delivered them why should be forced to pay. Regards Peter Muller
Report Abuse
Added by Mari, 29 Sep 2011
What do we do with a rental agreement on a printer if we feel that we are paying far too much? We have obtained quotes on comparable products and the differences are staggering! Please advise.
Report Abuse
Added by shafie2, 07 Sep 2011
is it possible that a company can threaten you with jail time for not paying them?
Report Abuse
Added by cherry, 10 Aug 2011
I bought some furniture from Morkels Pinetown for about R20 000, after a while i lost my job but still managed to pay the monthly installments, the acc is a little in arears but I still am paying the installments, now because I missed one payment, they threatened to reposes the goods after I have paid so much, is this fare, what can I do?? I have every intention of settling this acc, I just had a bad month.
Report Abuse
Added by Fed Up Real Estate Agent, 21 May 2011
I paid a couple of thousand rand to a company who advertises on the EAAB's web page, one would assume that they are reputable. After paying and attending the orientation class and listening to all the complaints of non performance, lack of supplying course material etc etc, I decided to request cancellation and refund. They are off the opinion that I do not have the right of cancellation. If I understand the CPA I am well within my rights, it is 5 days after completing on line form and paying, and directly after the class that I phoned, and followed up with email confirming cancellation and refund. Please advise. Thank you
Report Abuse
Added by nela, 21 Feb 2011
Does anyone have a telephone number for the consumer protection act Ombud I need to sort out a company Thanks NELA
Report Abuse
Added by dmc, 22 Dec 2010
About time we get such legislation. I've had my new cell for about 3.5 months and I've had to take it in for repairs 4times already. After the 4 times I'm still having problems. Repairs take at least one week. Vodacom simply does not care. I'm a busy person and rely heavily on my phone. I'm already dreading the next 1 to 2 weeks that I'll be without my phone for it's 5th instalment of repairs. Surely it is unfair and unreasonable of them to expect me to just continue sending my phone in for repairs. At the least they should have offered me a new phone already considering that I've had the thing for a such a short period of time. What is the point of having a cell that is in repairs so often, especially if it's supposed to be a high-end device and you are paying through your ears for it. My whole intention for having this phone is being frustrated by this bloody company's refusal to just give me a new phone.
Report Abuse
Added by Distressed & Fed Up, 22 Sep 2010
Am very unhappy with the services of the cellphone vendor that I recently got into bed with just last month. The phone that I got on contract with them has been nothing but a pain in the neck. I've had to return it twice for a newer one yet the ink on the contract hasn't even dried yet!!! Whenever I return it, because of software faults, I've had to spend days without a phone to use!!! As we speak it's been a week that I have been waiting to hear that "my claim has been approved" How fair is it that I'm the one that's paying THEM yet I'm the one suffering?! In a month this bill is to be enforced yet I'm in this position!
Report Abuse
Added by Less, 03 Dec 2009
Be it be tough or not for companies, thats nothing compared to what the consumers have been subjected to, which in most cases has always been a "take it or leave it" situation where ofcourse the customer is forced to take. I feel its high time something like this came into place. Customers (including myself) have had to deal with such pettiness of having, or rather forced to buy the lowest priced airtime voucher which most telecoms companies have introduced, that has a recommended selling price of R5.00 but shops and other street vendors sell it for R5.50 or R6.00. That as a customer feel its not fair and i'm not getting value for money. With that said hope the act forces the companies to make things to work more in our favour.
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Eight consumer protection rights
quick poll
Question

How concerned are you that your clients might fall for deepfake or other AI-backed cybercrime scams, especially in financial or investment settings?

Answer