orangeblock

Could South Africa have its ‘Turkish Spring’ moment?

13 June 2013 | Talked About Features | Straight Talk | Fiona Zerbst

The so-called ‘Arab Spring’ – the media’s handy packaging of uprisings that raged in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya and Yemen towards the end of 2010 – forced a handful of dictators from power. But the protests in Turkey at the beginning of June couldn’t be quite

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is no Mubarak, no Gaddafi – he is a largely popular leader who came to power at the polls (he scooped almost half the nation’s vote in 2011) and who mostly runs the economy adroitly. In fact, Turkey’s economy is the fastest-growing in an anaemic Europe, per capita income having tripled under Erdogan’s management. So what are the protests about?

They began with a sit-in, a peaceful objection to the government’s intention to turn green and pleasant Gezi Park into yet another shopping mall. When the protestors were attacked by the police, anger spread.

Although Twitter activists mobilised in the spirit of the ‘Occupy’ movement, with the hashtag #OccupyGezi prominent, the issue was not about thieving bankers but about creeping authoritarianism. Erdogan has a tendency to crack down on his opponents and stifle dissent – in fact, Turkey has the highest number of journalists in prison. Little wonder that citizens feel their voices are not being heard.

Democracies can also stifle dissent

What this underlines is the fact that democracies, too, can reach boiling point. Democracy is not just about holding – and winning – elections (take note, Jacob Zuma). It is very much a process, not an end in itself.

Turkey’s protests should serve as a warning. First, a growing economy is no guarantee of a satisfied populace. Second, an elected leader with authoritarian tendencies – and a loyal police-force – is unlikely to gain the confidence of a nation’s citizens.

Turkey and South Africa are often compared to one another. Both are emerging markets with potential, but with significant downsides to their potential currently at the fore. Both have current account deficits of more than 6% of their GDP and both attracted significant inflows to their bond markets – though investors have cooled to both countries recently, which is a worry, as both require foreign direct investment (FDI) to reduce their deficits. But South Africa is unmistakeably sitting on a larger powder-keg than Turkey (Turkey’s unemployment rate is only 8.4%, for example).

Will South Africa follow suit?

Should South Africa worry about similar protests? In a word, yes.

Our economy is growing, but only marginally, and unemployed South Africans feel they are getting nowhere fast. The simmering tensions on BREAK the mines, post-Marikana, show that little has been resolved in terms of labour disputes – 2012 was the most protest-filled year in the country since the demise of apartheid, but we have yet to see what 2013’s strike season will bring. Metals prices continue to disappoint as the commodities super-cycle runs out of steam, which is going to lead to mines laying off workers or, at the very least, withholding pay-rises. In May, Impala Platinum said it could not afford to offer wage hikes during negotiations with trade unions.

Next year is an election year, and at least some of the political tensions that are beginning to emerge may unsettle a citizenry already worrying about inflation, unemployment or employment uncertainty and debt.

A small protest about a park has caused Turkey to rise up and protest – what would it take in South Africa?

Editor’s thoughts:
I was amused to see Syria issue a travel warning regarding Turkey, advising its citizens to refrain from travelling there due to the ‘deteriorating security situation’ – though as Turkey is harbouring about 370 000 Syrian refugees the Syrian’s government back-biting is to be expected. More worryingly, though, the Turkish stock market fell by 5% after the riots and the Turkish lira took a beating. If South Africa were to experience similar protests, what do you think the economic consequences would be? Comment below or email fiona@fanews.co.za.

Comments

Added by James, 13 Jun 2013
Building malls on sensitive land and taking away the people's open spaces is a risky business for governments where the people are liberated and stand together. In SA we have the current example of Princess Vlei near Grassy Park- parallels here there certianly is- please save Princess Vlei www.bottomroadsanctuary.co.za
Report Abuse
Added by Elvis, 13 Jun 2013
To dangerous to contemplate or instigate. Past protest caused havoc. Schools burnt, Shops Looted, Property Damaged, People Killed. Our people are prone to mass hysteria and all reason and logic is forgotten. I would rather try and influence government with my vote rather than instigating a mass protest. Very Very dangerous especially considering South Africa past history and it's underlying expectations of redressing the past. Read Between The Lines.
Report Abuse
Added by paulj, 13 Jun 2013
UK and France and Russia and China are more likely to do experience such protests - sorry THEY ALREADY HAVE
Report Abuse
Added by edsaid, 13 Jun 2013
We would be wise to not blame the government (i.e. Zuma), the economy or circumstances beyond our control for the issues of our time. That very thought is the problem. If we keep saying that the problem is out there, we disempower ourselves, and empower the weaknesses of others to continue messing our lives up. Government's role is to keep the nation peaceful. It is our responsibility (mine and yours) to create our own future. I mean to say the responsibility of making a success of my life, my family and my country begins with me. By looking to government to intervene in the economy, we enforce the belief that we are at their mercy and empower them to run the country into the ground. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupt absolutely. Are you going to give your power away?
Report Abuse
Added by Nick, 13 Jun 2013
Sadly South Africa's history is South Africa"s judgement.
Report Abuse
Added by concerned citizen, 13 Jun 2013
The actual problem with the whole South African scenario is that the carrot dangling in front of an uneducated mass is Apartheid. The so-called service delivery protests were done as if meant to be against Apartheid and not after twenty corrupt and inefficient officials, for who the same protesters will vote in every election until that day that the peels will fall from their eyes. As the now defunct Julius Malema stated that if he is found to be corrupt before a day in court than many a politician will have now future in government, and that includes the president. The actual reasons for lack of everything is still Apartheid and the suffering experienced by many will still be due by Apartheid, therefore in conclusion the present government is just as obsessed with race and corrupt as the previous governments from colonialism to Apartheid, there is no difference at all.
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Could South Africa have its ‘Turkish Spring’ moment?
quick poll
Question

How concerned are you that your clients might fall for deepfake or other AI-backed cybercrime scams, especially in financial or investment settings?

Answer