orangeblock

A good decade for South African consumers

13 February 2012 | Talked About Features | Straight Talk | Gareth Stokes

The South African consumer is among the best-protected in the world. Since 2004, financial services consumers have engaged confidently with intermediaries and product providers thanks to safeguards introduced in the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Ser

Consumers of financial services will soon benefit from additional protections following the Financial Services Board (FSB) decision to implement Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) regulations. This regulation will ensure a higher standard of consumer protection across the financial services space. Its primary objective is to embed the fair treatment of consumers into corporate culture. There are six “fairness” outcomes embedded in the regulation to ensure the consumer gets a “fair” deal from product design to performance! “TCF applies to all FSB regulated entities,” says Wassermann. It offers a fuller and more comprehensive set of consumer protections than the FAIS Act because it forces companies to reform their business practices. The regulation demands a proactive approach and encourages companies to identify problems and implement redress as early as possible. Unfortunately banks and medical schemes will fall outside the TCF regulation for now.

Banks must treat customers fairly too

The regulators will have to bring banks into the fold due to ongoing complaints about their fee structures and financial product distribution practices. Phil Billingham, a regulatory change specialist at UK-based Threesixty Services, shared the following at a recent FAnews TCF Seminar: “It is clear from UK statistics that the adviser, who accounts for around 80% of financial services product distribution, only contributes to around 1.5% of complaints. Banks meanwhile, with a mere 20% of the distribution load, were responsible for 90% of post-sales disputes.” We expect a detailed analysis of post-sales financial services complaints in the domestic market would yield a similar “result”.

Local financial services stakeholders can expect many regulatory changes over the next three years. National Treasury recently published their vision for the South African financial services environment in a paper titled A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa Better. The so-called “Red Book” documents a series of legislative changes that South Africa will have to implement to meet undertakings given at the G20. These changes will lead to greater financial stability at an institutional level, extended consumer protection, improved access to financial services products and reductions in financial crime. South Africa will develop a “twin peaks” model under which the Reserve Bank is tasked with prudential regulation and the FSB with market conduct. As National Treasury pushes ahead with these changes, banks will eventually be drawn in.

Future consumer protections

FAIS, the CPA, the various industry ombudsman schemes and TCF are the first steps on the path to holistic consumer protection. “Apart from TCF there are a couple of other consumer protection issues that must be considered,” said Wassermann. The insurance industry regulation has to “tie in” with the CPA by October 2012. Further changes to the insurance Acts are likely to be introduced throughout 2012. And all industries will soon have to comply with the Protection of Personal Information Bill too…

For the long-suffering intermediary – the commission debate is warming up again. The FSB has fired the next salvo in this debate by inviting stakeholders to comment on the role of intermediaries and intermediary remuneration. They will be asking to what extent consumers are insulated from commissions being used as incentives to sell product. Another possibility is that the existing ombudsman schemes, both statutory and voluntary, will be drawn together under a super ombudsman. This structure has already had success in the UK – a jurisdiction the FSB has proven keen to copy over time. Solvency Assessment and Management (SAM) – which must come into effect from January 2014 – is also on the cards. This framework brings South Africa in line with the European Solvency II regulation and will address solvency issues and risk management issues to ensure local insurance institutions are adequately capitalised.

Consumer rights are at the forefront of current regulatory interventions and there will be many fundamental changes over the next three years. “Consumers have the right to deal with financial services firms where TCF is central to the culture of the firm, the right to access of financial services at both low and high end, the right to be informed of their purchase, the right to protection of personal information, the right to receive correct and unbiased advice on financial products regardless of the circumstances, the right that the product must perform as promised, and the right to free and easy resolution of complaints,” concluded Wassermann. By sticking with the provisions in the FAIS Act (intermediaries) and TCF (product providers) the industry is certain to enshrine these rights.

Editor’s thoughts: In a recent discussion with an insurance company chief executive concerns were raised over whether the current consumer protections were a step too far. Financial services companies are concerned that the cost associated with consumer protection compliance could make it impossible to service the lower income market. Additional regulation will protect consumers but reduce access! Is there a risk that TCF will reduce access to financial services products, particularly in the low income space? Add your comment below, or send it to [email protected]

Comments

Added by Cynical Simon., 17 Feb 2012
Well ! Well ! How re-assuring ! Regulations that did zilth for preventing Europe from going bancrupt will certainly ensure continued wealth and prosperity in South Africa. These regulations from this "down the drain" Europe certainly are truly PRO-ACTIVE..Shame what a joke.
Report Abuse
Added by Irene, 16 Feb 2012
FAIS, CPA & all other legislation and regulations is long overdue. Contrary to the Competition Commission ideas, what we also need is a minimun cover and conditions standard. All the legislation introduced the past few years now just formalised the rules by which every decent professional should have been operating under in any event. Only the inefficient FSPs are complaining. I had to press for 6 MONTHS to get a copy of my policy and have now been waiting for 4 MONTHS for an explanation on, inter alia, how I am supposed to prove that my vehicles are fitted with a standard factory fitted security system, why there is a gap between my basic liability and top-up cover, contradictions in conditions - go figure. My friends tell me to take my custom elsewhere, but why should I? The broker gets ongoing commission, charges me various fees and then does not have the common courtesy to answer my questions? Should there be any dispute in the event of a claim, and either the ST and/or FAIS Ombud rules against the industry, everybody then cries foul and blames these Ombuds for taking matters too far?
Report Abuse
Added by Humphrey, 13 Feb 2012
We have gone from a fair size insurance company to what I call a large compliance company with a division called insurance - this inhibits the business and ultimately costs the consumer in terms of increased premiums due to ever escalating expense ratios
Report Abuse
Added by Ayanda, 13 Feb 2012
Humphrey is entirely correct. All of the so called consumer protections introduced by this plethora of laws and "regulations" are already enshrined in our rich Common Law where they can be readily accessed. The socialist-run FSB is not in the least bit interested in how much more consumers are having to pay. What counts for them is how many new Acts they can proudly claim to administer, how many more staff they can then justify employing and how much more 'control' they think they have over an industry far more attuned to customer needs than they could ever be. The FSB once had 8 (eight) employees, including the Registrar. Now they have over 538 and no one is better off save their employees, each earning 13 cheques a year, come what may. However, the cost of all those salaries pales into insignificance when compared with the cost of actual compliance. The bottom of the market already battles to get service. The very people whom the FSB claims to serve are perversely being panalised by much higher costs and much less service, as people who know better leave the industry in droves, taking their skills, expertise and accumulated knowledge with them to better climes and discouraging new entrants. The British FSA, run by LSE and Oxford socialist language and economics graduates with little real world financial experience, has literally decimated their financial services industry in a decade.(Even wiping out the famous "Man from the Pru"!). What was once the world's leading insurance hub is now a relative international backwater. Why do we insist on doing the same to our beloved country? Why do we insist on aping this expensive failing model?!
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

A good decade for South African consumers
quick poll
Question

If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?

Answer