SUB CATEGORIES Featured Story |  Straight Talk |  The Stage | 

Will regulation of the hedge fund industry encourage investment?

05 May 2014 Jonathan Faurie
Jonathan Faurie, FAnews Journalist

Jonathan Faurie, FAnews Journalist

Regulation has been one of the foremost issues on the minds of companies within the financial services industry over the past few years. While asset managers and investors is now used to an environment where the majority of the public isn’t very well educated on the investment industry, the growth of the internet as well as the Financial Services Board’s (FSB) move towards introducing Treating Customers Fairly and the Retail Distribution Review has seen the public becoming more aware of the financial services industry and the important role it plays in their lives.

This is fast becoming the case with hedge funds, which like umbrella funds in the retirement industry, is seen as an investment vehicle whereby costs are reduced and the public can provide greater input on the governance of the fund.

Regulatory supervision of the R45-odd billion South African hedge fund industry – which, depending on the strategy followed, returned between 4.7 % to 27 % to investors during 2013 – recently took a step closer to finalisation with the release by National Treasury and the FSB of draft regulations for public comment.

Trying to make regulation work for the industry

George Cavaleros (CFA), Partner at Deloitte & Touche, points out that the draft regulations, which stem from South Africa's G20 obligations, aim to protect hedge fund investors, manage systemic risk and promote the integrity of and transparency in the hedge fund industry. They also focus on the regulation of hedge fund products. Currently hedge fund managers are regulated under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS).

"The authorities have taken what can be considered a pragmatic and flexible approach in achieving their objectives by allowing for two types of hedge funds, both of which will fall under the ambit of the Collective Investment Schemes Controls Act (CISCA), the same legislation that regulates collective investment scheme portfolios in South Africa,” says Cavaleros.

The first type, the Qualified Investor Hedge Fund (QIHF), is aimed at high level investors who are either experienced in investment matters or who have appointed experienced FAIS Act registered advisors to assist them and who have a minimum hedge fund investment budget of R1 million. Institutional investors are also included in this category.

QIHFs can only be marketed to qualified investors and will not be available to the general public.

The second type, the Retail Investor Hedge Fund (RIHF), is aimed at the retail market and is available to all potential investors, especially individuals who are interested in hedge fund exposure.

Cavaleros points out that while the draft regulations provide for certain general rules and principles that are applicable to all hedge funds, such as the principle that an investor cannot lose more than the invested capital, the specific provisions relating to RIHFs are more onerous and provide for more regulatory safeguards than those affecting QIHFs. "In the case of leverage for instance, QIHF managers have the flexibility to determine their own leverage levels, subject to certain disclosures, while gross exposure by RIHFs is limited to 200% of the fund's net asset value. Regarding permitted investments, RIHFs are subject to investment exposure limits, while QIHFs are not restricted in the same way.”

This regulatory differential follows the regulator's view that qualified investors are generally more investment savvy than their average retail counterparts, allowing them to better appreciate hedge fund mechanics and the risk return profiles of investments in the hedge fund universe.

Changing perceptions

Another objective of the regulation being imposed by the FSB is that the public is offered greater protection when it comes to participating in the financial services industry.

"Hopefully these regulations will assist in changing the perception held by many potential investors that hedge funds are toxic or high risk investments that should be avoided as they could be value destructive. It is true that investors have lost money in the hedge fund space. Some losses have been due to hedge fund investment manager errors and operational risk management failures, but many were probably a function of speculative investing and the selection of funds whose profiles were at odds with investors' investment strategy and risk tolerance,” says Cavaleros.

He adds that the reality is that hedge funds, due to their characteristics, have a useful role to play in a well-constructed portfolio. These include their low correlation to other investments resulting in portfolio diversification, the stabilisation of returns and the reduction in volatility. On the negative side, their fees are generally high.

It is expected that the tax regime for both types of hedge funds will be similar to that applicable to unit trusts and their investors. Distributions made by hedge funds will be taxed in the hands of the investors depending on their tax status. Capital Gains Tax will also accrue to investors who meet the necessary requirements.

Regulatory concerns raise burning questions

While regulation is welcome in an industry, there are always concerns about the volume of regulation with fears that over regulation is more detrimental to the industry than beneficial.

"The proposed new regulations do however raise many potential questions. Will the cost of supervision, investor protection, transparency, and reporting have the effect of increasing costs, thereby reducing returns? Will the steps introduced to reduce risk, such as exposure limits for RIHFs, limit the hedge fund manager's ability to generate the most appropriate returns? How will the retail industry, which has a lot to gain from a cash inflow perspective, respond to the regulations and how far will it go in pursuit of retail clients? Are the retail industry distribution channels sufficiently skilled and effective to enable fair marketing of RIHFs? Will the industry be able to attract sufficient new cash flows to create RIHFs that are sustainable in the long term?” asks Cavaleros.

He adds that the proposed transition period of one year from the promulgation of the regulations to enable managers, administrators and hedge fund investment managers to comply with the regulatory requirements will prove challenging and costly. "In many instances, risk management and compliance functions and tools will have to be enhanced and formalised, data sources tested to assess whether they are capable of complying with the reporting requirements, contracts and mandates checked for suitability and regulatory registration in terms of CISCA finalised. Some participants will have to evaluate whether existing systems and retail platforms require any modification. The upside of all this alignment to the regulations is the continued strengthening of the industry's infrastructure to become more efficient and better able to respond to investor demands.”

The upside of all this alignment to the regulations is the continued strengthening of the industry's infrastructure to become more efficient and better able to respond to investor demands.

Editor's Thoughts:
Investment vehicles which decrease costs and encourage investment are becoming more popular in South Africa as government has become vocal over its desire to increase the number of people who can achieve financial freedom. Regulating this environment may offer significant benefits to the public or it may prove to be detrimental. Please comment below, interact with us on Twitter at @fanews_online or email me your thoughts

Comment on this post

Email Address*
Security Check *
Quick Polls


How confident are you that insurers treat policyholders fairly, according to the Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) principles?


Very confident, insurers prioritise fair treatment
Somewhat confident, but improvements are needed
Not confident, there are significant issues with fair treatment
fanews magazine
FAnews June 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Understanding prescription in claims for professional negligence
Climate change… the single biggest risk facing insurers
Insuring the unpredictable: 2024 global election risks
Financial advice crucial as clients’ Life policy premiums rise sharply
Guiding clients through the Two-Pot Retirement System
There is diversification, and true diversification – choose wisely
Decoding the shift in investment patterns
Subscribe now