orangeblock

Think twice before that S14 transfer

07 October 2008 | Retirement | General | Gareth Stokes

There have been a number of legislative changes to the Pension Funds Act in recent times. As we write this an amendment to Section 14 (7) of the Act proposes that financial advisers be free to negotiate ongoing fees with their clients when completing Section 14 Transfers. Summarised, “a transferring member will be able to authorise the Fund or Administrator to pay an ongoing advice fee to their adviser on their behalf when transfer from an underwritten Retirement Annuity Fund to a non-underwritten Retirement Annuity Fund occurs.” This fee will be negotiated annually and agreed in writing with the transferring member.

Once the latest amendment is signed into law, the issue of appropriate financial advice on processing the transfer is (once again) under the spotlight. And as Old Mutual reveals the decision to transfer or not involves much more than a direct comparison of ongoing fees.

Section 14 defined

Before we continue with the discussion let’s quickly lay out what a Section 14 Transfer is. Old Mutual provides the following definition: “A Section 14 Transfer is the move of assets funding a member’s benefits in an approved fund to another approved fund or to any other person. The provisions of Section 14 of the Pension Funds Act 1956 govern the transfers between Retirement Annuity Funds.” You have to distinguish here between the approved funds such as the South African Retirement Annuity Fund (SARAF) and the Central Retirement Annuity Fund (CRAF) and underwriters like Old Mutual and Sanlam.

Old Mutual uses an example to describe the process. What has to happen if Joe Public, a member of SARAF whose benefits are funded by an Old Mutual Flexi Pension Retirement Annuity policy, decides to move his retirement benefits to a Sanlam Retirement Annuity offered by CRAF? “In order for Joe to move his retirement benefits, he will need to apply for a transfer of his benefits within SARAF to CRAF. In order for SARAF to carry out Joe’s instructions it has to cancel its contract with the underwriter, Old Mutual.” And here’s the important bit.

This cancellation takes place “on whatever terms and conditions are applicable to the contract governing [in this case] the Flexi Pension Retirement Annuity policy.” Old Mutual says that transfers within the SARAF Retirement Annuity Fund occur immediately or at month end, while those to other retirement annuity funds take approximately three months, unless a non-valuation exempt fund is involved, in which case the process can be a lengthy affair.

Legislative changes make S14 Transfers possible

When we previously discussed S14 Transfers the Pensions Fund Amendment Act had just been implemented. This Act made it possible for fund members to complete transfers regardless of rules to the contrary in their particular Retirement Annuity Fund. Old Mutual notes that these amendments were made “in the context of the increasing demand for customer choice and flexibility in retirement funding arrangements.”

These initial amendments were dominated by concerns for the retirement annuity member. One of the worries was that financial advisers not be given “undue incentives” to advise members to conclude S14 Transfers. To this end Section 14(7)(b) of the Pension Funds Act prohibited the payment of fees or commissions by any party to the transfer. The only exception in this regard was where the transferring fund paid these fees – and then only to the amount payable by the transferor at the time of the transfer.

Once this situation changes the onus will once again shift to the financial adviser to make sure that S14 Transfer recommendations place their client in a financially better situation. And that means plenty of analysis will be required.

Full analysis required to make sure client benefits

It’s critical for financial intermediaries advising clients on a S14 Transfer to do their homework. Old Mutual says there are a number of potential risks that should be considered before implementing a move between retirement annuity funds. These include:

· The risk that the fund value of the current retirement funding vehicle may be reduced when the contract is cancelled or transferred. (We hope this consideration features as part of the standard ‘before and after’ calculations to determine whether making the transfer is worthwhile).

· The risk of forfeiting valuable guarantees on the existing fund. (Financial advisers will have to make sure they check the original policy for any guarantees that cannot be met in the new fund and mention these guarantees to the client).

· The risk of forfeiting life, disability or other risk benefits on the policy when transferring. (Once again the financial adviser will have to check the existing policy thoroughly to determine whether such benefits exist, and advise the client accordingly).

· The risk of missing viable options within the same retirement annuity fund. (The financial adviser should consider options to move from “old generation” to “new generation” retirement funding vehicles as a first point of departure).

After going through the above list the financial intermediary still has to do some basic financial projections to determine if the transfer is worthwhile. Although the gut feeling is often that the client will be better off in a new arrangement with lower service fees, due attention should be given to aspects such as the capital available for transfer and the number of years to retirement.

A quick example

Old Mutual illustrates this by referring back to the Joe Public example. At transfer date Joe’s Old Mutual underwritten Flexi Retirement Annuity Fund has a value of R123 082, premium contributions of R275 per month, a remaining policy term of 10 years and effective ongoing annual charges of 3.1%. Assuming a return of 11% per annum (before costs) on this policy he would receive retirement capital of R312 867.

Should Joe transfer these funds? The first point is that the funds available for transfer (after contractual fees / penalties) amount to R104 589. To achieve the same retirement capital (R312 867) under similar conditions the total annual ongoing charges on the new retirement annuity fund would have to be no more than 1.5% per annum.

Editor’s thoughts:
Deciding to move your client’s funds from one retirement annuity to another requires a detailed analysis of the financial prospects before and after the move. It’s not enough to simply compare costs on the two arrangements. What financial analysis would you conduct before advising a client to complete a Section 14 Transfer? Add you comments below, or send them to [email protected]

Comments

Added by Joel , 16 Aug 2020
Our company was transferred under section 197 in 2019 and they us that our prof profident funds are now subjected under section 14 ,meaning that our funds will be transferred from Liberty to the new employer scheme without giving us the option to withdraw or transfer our funds, and than told us the transfer will take 168 days till to date nothing has been done, we have contacted our former HR for a withdrawal of funds and the answer was a big NO ,it has been over 9 months now and the 168 days has passed we sitting at 270 days since we were transferred in the 1 of November 2019.
Report Abuse
Added by denise, 09 Oct 2019
why must we wait so long for our money i took a potion of my pension and it is already 3months..why is my money
Report Abuse
Added by denise, 09 Oct 2019
why must we wait so long for our money i took a potion of my pension and it is already 3months..why is my money
Report Abuse
Added by Jackie Witbooi, 11 Jun 2019
My monies is going nowhere with Old Mutual. They are charging me R17 000 just for transferring fees. Old Mutual ask massive admin fees to any other institute. I don't trust them. I will rather move now then to regret it later. Insurance companies will always talk good about themselves and then say the law said we can do this.
Report Abuse
Added by Jacks , 07 Feb 2019
Our company was bought by another company so we wer given option whether to withdraw our funds or transfer the whole company decided to with draw so know when we call to make follow up checks wer are told our monies are on hold can HR stop us from withdrawing our funds since we wer given the option to withdraw or transfer
Report Abuse
Added by Zips, 13 Sep 2018
our company was bought by another company in 2016,and they have applied sect.14 to transfer our funds. My problem is since Jan.2017 till now,our retirement money is stalling,zero growth and we are told it is because of "section 14 pending" ..and it's been 20months already
Report Abuse
Added by Paulus Pieter Johan Links, 27 Jul 2018
I receive a monthly pension,may I withdrawn the remain pension benefit,if I in finance predicament.Or can I transfer out of the pension
fund.
Report Abuse
Added by Peter, 23 Oct 2017
Can Management of a Company compel Provident Fund members to migrate from an existing Provident fund to the one Management prefers without the buy-in of the entire membership group.
Report Abuse
Added by Dino Ducci, 19 Sep 2017
I think it is important to understand the section 14 transfer fees first before making the decision to move to companies like Sygnia and 10X that are disrupting the likes of Liberty and Old Mutual through much lower fees and ongoing commissions. In my case it only cost around R250.00 to do so. It is then a no brainer to move
Report Abuse
Added by Karin Swanepoel, 26 Mar 2015
I've been advised by a PSG consultang to move my Sanlam Central Retirement Annuity Fund to a PSG Wealh Retirement Annuity Fund. The impilications thereto is a costly R25,658-88 which doesn't mzke sense to me as: 1. I received no comparison between the 2 funds for a period to allow me to compare apples with apples, neither how Sanlam arrived at his figure. More so as I only have another 5 years to the date of maturity. What makes no sense is that Government wants to encourage Individuals to save for Retiremnt but in the same breath, allows the Public to be exploited by Insurance Companies or their Representatives. It's no wonder I just see wolves in sheeps' clothing when it comes to this Industry.
Report Abuse
Added by Solman, 25 Jun 2012
PSG has defined section 14 more clearly. Your examples are useful
Report Abuse
Added by Pule, 29 Apr 2009
I became aware that I cannot terminate my RAF before the age of 55 and want to know at what stage and circumstances can one terminate the RAF before maturity. Can it be terminated?
Report Abuse
Added by Wimpie Barnard, 08 Oct 2008
The main reason why this transfer is not viable is due to the huge penalty that Mutual levy (approx R19 000)
Report Abuse
Added by Bryan Shepstone, 08 Oct 2008
There are other problems too. I have come across cases where the advisor is charging a 1% "admin fee" to do the S14, so getting around the nil commission issue. He then charged 1% trail as an ongoing fee, in addition to the platform fee and the underlying manager's fee. There is very little chance of the so-called "new generation" product ever catching the "old generation" product on this basis and in my view there is not often going to be substantial benefit once all charges have been inculded. The acid test I guess, is 'will I be doing it on my policies?' - I don't think I will be.
Report Abuse
Added by Dan Fraser, 07 Oct 2008
One important factor is not given to IFA's, and that is the ongoing charges that are levied against the "old generation" funds. If these were transparent then a comparative calculation can be done. Vague percentages (eg as shown on old quotations) are not acceptable. The product suppliers should be obliged by the new regulation to provide IFA's or the client with these figures when a transfer is contemplated
Report Abuse
Added by Mike Chong, 07 Oct 2008
Old generation products often hide the full actualrial loss that would be incurred and this is often also not made known to the all parties concerned.
Report Abuse
Added by Tim Jones, 07 Oct 2008
It is interesting that now the companies talk about upgrading policies to new generation policies when they refuse to reward the intermediary for doing so.In fact the original intrmediary still gets the trail commission even though the new intermediary takes responsibility for the advice given and ongoing service. How can this be right?
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Think twice before that S14 transfer
quick poll
Question

If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?

Answer