KEEP UP TO DATE WITH ALL THE IMPORTANT COVID-19 INFORMATIONCOVID-19 RESOURCE PORTAL
FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Retirement
SUB CATEGORIES General |  Savings & Investments |  Annuties | 

Retirement funds: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

07 December 2020 Ronald King, Head of Public Policy and Regulatory Affairs at PSG Wealth

It is often argued that there is no real tax benefit to investing in a retirement fund, because while contributions are tax deductible, the resultant annuity is taxable. Does it then make sense to invest in a retirement fund, considering the restrictions imposed on these funds by Regulation 28?

Understanding the tax benefit
However, this argument ignores the fact that the tax rates of retirees are normally significantly lower than prior to retirement when they received the tax benefits from contributions. It also ignores the benefit of tax-free growth within the portfolio as well as benefits in estate duty. The table below compares an endowment, a voluntary investment plan, a tax-free investment plan and a retirement annuity.

Tax comparison between different investment options

 

Endowment

Voluntary investment plan

Tax-free investment plan

Retirement annuity

Tax deductibility of contributions

Non-deductible

Non-deductible

Non-deductible

Deductible up to prescribed limits

Taxation of fund growth

Interest taxed at 30%

Dividends taxed at 20%

CGT taxed at 12%

Interest taxed at 45%*

Dividends taxed at 20%

CGT taxed at 18%*

 

Tax free

Tax free

Taxation of maturity value

Tax free

Tax free

Tax free

Lump sum taxed according to tax table; annuity taxed as normal income

Estate duty

Subject to estate duty

Subject to estate duty

Subject to estate duty

Only the excess contributions made to the fund are subject to estate duty

*After exemptions have been exhausted.

 

Tax impact on investment example

 

Endowment

Voluntary investment plan

Tax-free investment plan

Retirement

annuity

Contribution

R1 000 p.m.

R1 000 p.m.

R1 000 p.m.

R1 818 p.m.

A tax-deductible contribution of R1 818 to a retirement annuity equates to a non-deductible contribution

of R1 000, as R818 will be saved on taxes.

Term of investment

15 years

Pre-tax fund growth

10.8%

Post-tax fund growth

8.93%

8.17%

10.8%

10.8%

See table below for assumptions used. CGT on endowment and VIP is deducted annually.

Maturity value

R378 823

R353 690

R450 306

R818 656

Tax on maturity value

R0

R0

R0

R294 716

Taxed at 36% as this is the average rate for an individual earning R1 500 000, and top band of lump sum tax table.

Net maturity value

R378 823

R353 690

R450 306

R523 940

 

 

Growth assumptions

 

 

 

% invested

Asset class return

Pre-tax return

Tax on VIP

Net return on VIP

Tax on endowment

Net return on endowment

Cash

40%

6%

2.4%

45%

1.32%

30%

1.68%

Equity growth

60%

11%

6.6%

18%

5.41%

12%

5.81%

Dividend growth

60%

3%

1.8%

20%

1.44%

20%

1.44%

 

 

 

10.8%

 

8.17%

 

8.93%

Assuming a balanced portfolio of 40% cash and 60% equities. Returns are deemed to be net of costs.

 

Understanding Regulation 28
Regulation 28 is aimed at preventing fund members or trustees from selecting highly concentrated portfolios and running the risk of losing everything. However, the most negative publicity retirement funds receive is probably because of Regulation 28 and the limitations it imposes – such as the 75% limitation on equity and 30% on offshore investments. It is argued that a retirement fund is a long-term investment and there should therefore be no limitation to investing in equities, which have historically provided the highest returns over the long term.

The same argument is made about the limitation on offshore assets. Research, however, shows that only a small percentage of investors invest close to the limitations that apply in terms of Regulation 28. In addition, it is possible to build a diversified aggressive portfolio within the confines of Regulation 28. Even where an investor believes a Regulation 28 portfolio is not the optimal choice for them, the potential return foregone by choosing a ‘more conservative’ portfolio is outweighed by the benefit of the tax savings realised (on contributions and returns).

Base decisions on facts, not fears
The issue of retirement funding is one that elicits many emotions from the public, but these are often not founded on facts, but rather on fears. While there are reasons for concern, these are often not as dire or cataclysmic as imagined. Retirement funds offer their investors a multitude of benefits, and these are best considered holistically when making an investment decision.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

How to give affordable and appropriate financial advice to the low income market segment. There is little room on a R50 pm policy for advisers to be remunerated for the time it would it would take to educate & fulfil admin function. What is the solution?

ANSWER

[a] Eliminate non-advice sales / telesales
[b] Implement industry standards for non-advice information
[c] Introduce an insurer-funded pro-bono advice network to low income earners
[d] Reinforce the Policyholder Protection Rules
fanews magazine
FAnews November 2020 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Customer experience in the ‘now’ generation
Is our industry a tainted industry?
How to keep brokers out of the firing line
Getting to grips with contractual versus delictual liability
International trusts and tax consequences
The COVID-19 pandemic and medical schemes
Subscribe now