orangeblock

Local roads claim 1551 lives this Christmas

18 January 2011 | People and Companies | News | Gareth Stokes

On Tuesday, 11 January 2010, transport minister Sbu Ndebele announced the country’s latest road death statistics. In just over one month 1, 551 people succumbed to motor vehicle accidents countrywide. The statistics cover a period beginning 1 December 2010 and ending on 8 January this year. “We don’t talk about deaths,” said Ndebele, “we talk about road carnage!” And he warned motorists that the 1, 147 per month average road death toll meant they should be asking when rather than if their turn was coming... A similar number of deaths (1, 582) were recorded over the 2009 festive season.

South Africa’s traffic authorities have struggled for years to reduce road deaths over the festive season, with limited success. The unfortunate truth is we average 1, 147 road accident deaths each month (2009 statistics) – way in excess of the 20 per month and 120 per month recorded in Australia and New Zealand respectively. Adjusting for our respective populations – there are roughly 49 million people in South Africa, 21 million in Australia and 4.5 million in New Zealand – we dominate the road accident deaths per 100 000 citizens per annum by quite some margin. We’re miles in the lead with 28.08 deaths per 100 000 citizens per annum compared to Australia (6.85) and New Zealand (5.33). I’m working on very rough numbers here; but the point is clearly illustrated!

This carnage has a massive price tag

The loss of a loved one cannot be measured in rand and cents, but the cost to the economy can. According to Road Traffic Management’s Road Traffic Accident Report 2009 there were 10, 857 fatal crashes and 13, 767 accident-related deaths two years back. A total of 4 066 drivers, 5 023 passengers and 4 678 pedestrians lost their lives. The cost of each fatal accident averages just under R1.233 million for an unbelievable R13.385 billion through 2009. And Automobile Association spokesperson, Gary Ronald, estimates that the latest festive season accidents will cost the country approximately R1.5 billion!

These numbers mean a great deal to stakeholders in the financial services space. Virtually every road accident, whether fatal or not, has an impact on both the short and long-term insurance industry. Long-term insurers have to assess and pay an increasing number of death and disability claims – while short-term insurers carry the cost of vehicle towing, storage, replacement and repair. It’s certainly in everyone’s benefit to do everything possible to reduce these alarming statistics.

Playing the blame game isn’t going to help

One of the great things about Internet news portals is the opportunity they offer readers to share their views. While researching today’s newsletter I came across dozens of user responses to the latest road death statistics. And they prove telling. Instead of accepting responsibility for the situation we’re all about explaining it away – or shifting the blame elsewhere.

We blame government for the poor state of the country’s roads and their inability to enforce existing traffic laws properly. And in the same breath we find dozens of reasons why certain road users are above the law. We believe speed limits are conditional upon the vehicle we drive or our assumed skill in handling our vehicles. We argue – for instance – that a 1967 VW Beetle travelling 100kph is more dangerous than a Ferrari doing 230kph. In other words – fine the Beetle driver and let the Ferrari driver walk. We reckon driving faster gets us to our destination sooner, which in turn means anyone driving at the speed limit will succumb to tiredness and be more likely to crash.

We say government should jump on “red light jumpers” rather than speeding, pull over un-roadworthy vehicles rather than new vehicles without number plates and ignore yielding at stop signs without question… We’re all about selective law enforcement with our primary requirement: “Don’t stop me – there’s someone out there doing something worse…” We even go so far as to question the road death statistics, pointing out that 40% of deaths are among pedestrians and therefore no fault of the motorists at all. And of course we flip out when government ministers get treated with “kid gloves” for driving 235kph. As one reader comments the Free State MEC for sport would have been languishing in jail – minus his drivers license and car – had he pulled a similar stunt in Australia...

If we hope to stem the tide of death on the country’s roads we’ll have to work on changing attitudes. Until then the 1, 147 per month average will probably escalate in line with the increase in road users each year.

Editor’s thoughts: The rules of the road are quite clear and anyone who has written their learners and taken their drivers knows what they are. But the minute we get behind the wheel our attitudes shift from “law abiding” to “he did it so we’ll do it to”. Do you have what it takes to change your attitude when it comes to obeying traffic law? Add your comment below, or send it to [email protected]

Comments

Added by Claire Densham, 21 Jan 2011
Thanks for this Gareth. I have decided to stop racing through yellow lights, partiuclalry those that have just turned red! I never used to, then I saw taxis doing it more and more and, eventually, I started as well. It makes it very hard to turn across an intersection when someone is using those last few seconds to speed through a light. The thing is, most people are so used to racing through yellow lights that yesterday the guy behind me was taken completely by surpise when I put on the brakes and he nearly went into me! I think we should start a campaign to re-sensistise people to the purpose of yellow lights - which is to give you a chance to slow down before a red light! Regards Claire
Report Abuse
Added by CB, 19 Jan 2011
You say the public shouldn't point fingers elsewhere. How many of the accidents and carnages that occur annually are caused by taxi's and unroadworthy vehicles? Bring these into the equation first before telling the public not to point fingers (not to shift the blame elsewhere).
Report Abuse
Added by Ron, 18 Jan 2011
My son lives in NZ. He overtook a vehicle on the left because the driver of that vehicle was going below the speed limit. My son had to exceed the speed limit by 10 kph to overtake. Someone phoned and reported his driving.He was pulled over by a police officer a few kms further on and fined. This may sound like a bit of an overkill, but nobody speeds in NZ. It's a way of life. I live in George and have to confess that generally this season, it appears as though people are driving more conservatively, but you do get the odd driver that wants to do 100kph in a 60kph zone. We as responsible drivers should be able to phone a number and report the reg. no. of the offender and they should be apprehended. This will change attitudes because law enforcement will be everywhere. If the authorities would back this kind of policing up we might just get somewhere.
Report Abuse
Added by M, 18 Jan 2011
Interesting figures. There are two sides to any story. Just to comment on the costs. Have the "positive" spin-offs been accounted for in the figures, like how much money the towers, panelbeaters, car manufacturers, salesmen, etc. are making out of this carnage? I am sure they are not complaining, even encouraged by the news. On the matter of the Law and Harry McGraw, if you remember that one. Any law can, and will be broken, no matter how stiff it can be. Let me tell you, the problems started far earlier, at childhood. What kind of morals do we instill in our kids, to make them considerate and caring? What example are we setting as adults? If we miss it there, forget it. These are the adults of tomorrow, and if they don't get it now, they are not going to get it anytime soon.
Report Abuse
Added by Joe, 18 Jan 2011
How many of these road deaths relate to public transport? The statistics will only be useful if the government can break it down and find actual causes. Whilst I agree that speed kills, the focus of law enforcement has to shift. The change in attitude has to be done, but done on both sides. Our biggest challenge as a country is to start aprpeciating the value of life. We are so used to "sacrificing" lives that 1551 deaths does nothing to our emotions. Think about what it took to save a few Chilean miners?
Report Abuse
Added by McT, 18 Jan 2011
A recent media release by Rob Handfield-Jones (http://www.abrbuzz.co.za/technology-and-events/34-safety/1296-ministers-road-death-claim-false-baseless) described the numbers stated by the DOT as being "incorrect" and that in fact the numbers could be as much as 47% more for this period under review than 2009/2010. So the road carnage, as the good minister describes, could actually be far worse? Regardless of the exact number of people who died on our roads over the "silly" season, one death is one too many. And we have a long way to still before we can deem our roads even remotely safe.
Report Abuse
Added by concerned, 18 Jan 2011
I think all the high placed government officials that have been given fines for excessive speeding should also be made to work in a casualty section of a busy hospital and see the havoc their actions caused. This community service should be at least 5 hours per week for at least a year.
Report Abuse
Added by Jim, 18 Jan 2011
R1bn in fines racked up over the Xmas season in Durban, most of them to taxi drivers, and most of which will never be collected. Why do they bother? The drivers simply move on to the next owner, and are never traced. No sanction means no compliance, and sanctimonious appeals to change attitudes resonate with no-one, especially not taxi-drivers whose income depends on defiance of the laws. We need to decriminalise all but the most serious offences. Take the offence away from the driver and apply it to the vehicle, and use a points system, with suspension of the vehicle licence for 12 months for any vehicle reaching, say, 12 points, irrespective of who was driving it. Taxi owners' desire to maximise income through pressure on drivers to overload and speed will immediately be counterbalanced by the need to keep vehicles on the road. And if you had a Ferrari, and were on 9 points, well, are you likely to give it a 230kph test, if it's going to be locked in the garage for a year? Second suspensions and, of course, operating a vehicle without a licence should carry a 24 month or a forfeiture penalty. Police can confiscate firearms- why not vehicles? And the penalty will usually match the offenders means; a Beetle owner who offends loses the use of a Beetle, while a wealthy Bentley owner loses the use of a Bentley. Another advantage is it removes the revenue-collecting bias of current enforcement practices. How would Metro and Provincial traffice services be funded? Well, they shouldn't be funded through fines anyway, and there would be plenty of savings in other areas. This proposal would take a huge load off the courts, and avoid the massive waste involved in the criminal justice process of fine, summons, court appearance (or usually non-appearance), and warrant which usually can't be served because the driver can't be traced.
Report Abuse
Added by Peter, 18 Jan 2011
For many years i have wondered about the stats that are given about the death toll over the Christmas period as well as the Easter weekend. Can someone maybe let us know what the average death toll is during the other months of the year. Then we can compare the deaths during the other 10 months with those 2 months of high volume traffic. I think it will be very interesting
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Local roads claim 1551 lives this Christmas
quick poll
Question

If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?

Answer