orangeblock

Getting tough on crime

02 December 2008 | Non-life | General | Gareth Stokes

Crime remains a major challenge to the country’s short-term insurance industry. Hi-jacking and robberies at homes and businesses cost the industry hundreds of millions of rand each year. That’s why the South African Insurance Associations (SAIA) makes an annual contribution to Business Against Crime South Africa (BACSA). In February 2008 SAIA donated just more than R1.4m to be used in projects to combat vehicle crime.

At the time, SAIA deputy chief executive, Refilwe Moletsane noted that “Motor insurance accounted for half of the short-term insurance industry’s net claims in 2005.” R9.1bn of the industry’s R18.4bn net claims in that year related to motor policies. And approximately 30% of this bill could be attributed to vehicle crime. In recent weeks BACSA has announced a new initiative to take the fight to the criminal.

What if the SAPS and security industry could work together?

Drive through any residential area in Gauteng and you can’t miss the armed response branding prominently displayed on boundary walls and gates. You’ll also notice private guards patrolling streets, manning access control points and looking after individual properties. The reason – for years South Africans have been funding their own ‘private’ police force – paying extra in an attempt to ensure their safety. Anyone who’s been a victim of crime recently will appreciate that private security personnel are usually the first at the scene. And it’s common knowledge that the private security industry employs more people than the South African Police Service (SAPS).

The good news is someone has finally come up with a plan to synchronise the efforts of these bodies. BACSA recently facilitated a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the SAPS Honeydew and the Security Industry Alliance in an effort to combat violent crime. “The high incidence of violent crimes is of serious concern to all the law abiding citizens,” said BACSA chief executive Siphiwe Nzimande, adding that “violent crime adversely affects all sectors and has a negative impact on the growth and development of the economy.”

BACSA says “the key component of this initiative is the establishment and use of a dedicated and secure radio communication system.” Individual security companies will be linked to a local police station to ensure speedy notification of crimes and coordinated response between the SAPS and private security personnel. Prior to joining the ‘partnership’ the private security firm must commit to compliance with legislation and the voluntary re-vetting of its security personnel.

Roll-out to other stations likely

The SAPS and Security Industry Alliance have spent a great deal of time establishing standard operating procedures for security companies that join the initiative. According to BACSA the “SAPS-led initiative focused on the Honeydew police station over [a number of] months [to establish] the operational framework and procedures of the partnership between private security companies and police stations…” They hope the MOU will be rolled out to other police stations soon.

The initiative was given a further boost with the opening on a new facility at the Honeydew police station. On 14 November 2008 the MEC for Community Safety officially opened a 288 square metre building to house a Client Service Centre, Crime Office and Honeydew Operational Coordinating Centre... BACSA says the facility “will enable the Honeydew police and local stakeholders to respond effectively to the crime challenges of the area.” It’s hoped that other policing districts follow this example to boost crime prevention, raise public confidence and increase detection, arrests and prosecution rates.

Although we welcome this public private partnership in the safety and security environment there are some concerns. One is whether the SAPS (on a national level) are ready to implement such initiatives. You would expect them to have their house in order before inviting other parties to assist with operational duties. If they get it right the long-term benefits of a relationship between SAPS and independent security firms will be significant. The thousands of security guards employed throughout the country could become the eyes and ears for the SAPS – and the visible security force that ordinary citizens hanker after.

Editor’s thoughts:
Chatting to neighbours, family and friends about their recent experiences one can be excused for doubting the latest SAPS statistics which point to a decline in most categories of violent crime. Armed response or not, the number of house breakings reported annually makes for some sombre reading. Do you believe private security firms should be given more ‘powers’ to assist the South African Police Services (SAPS)? Send your comments to [email protected] or add your comments below.

Comments

Added by I-Cube, 03 Dec 2008
The ability to share information is the best way to reduce crime, allowing those who have access to this information to proactively react. If every shopping centre, petrol station, stadium, police station, metro cop, school, estate, traffic camera or other site with cameras was linked to a central database, criminals would be denied the use of the road. When the vehicle is captured by the exiting camera, rather than only recording the information, the image is sent to a central server which extracts the vehicle colour, shape, type and license plate automatically. These are then compared, in real time, to the SAPS (and other insurance databases). When a match is found an alarm can be generated within seconds allowing proactive reaction to stolen vehicles stopping the criminals from using the roads. I-Cube currently supplies this technology to a wide range of customers. Please contact I-Cube for more details and a site visit? The price for this technology starts from 12c per plate and gets less with the more plates you check. Please have a look at www.I-Cube.co.za for more information on the LPR technology and the solutions discussed. Cheers Barry I-Cube 082 562 8225
Report Abuse
Added by RV, 03 Dec 2008
The crooks got more power than our police. Let the security people at least have the same power as our police.
Report Abuse
Added by David , 02 Dec 2008
i cannot see the point in paying security firms, as i do if they are not allowed to take action against criminals on private property. get broken into as often as i have and your opinion will also change! "shoot the bastards" Dave Pinelands
Report Abuse
Added by B, 02 Dec 2008
The problem with the involvement of agencies other than that of the SAP is that very limited resources are made available to them to take appropriate action. The eyes and ears of crime fighters must be every law abiding citizen of this country but alas nobody really wants to get involved. Capital punishment is perhaps an answer but the problem is that you have to apprehend the perpertrator which in most instances does not occur. A reward system for meaningful information must be put into place. For instance a person who supplies information which leads to the arrest and apprehension of say car thief syndication must be rewarded hansomely by the insurance companies. If a person is caught breaking the law..say reckless driving the guilty person must be screened by the authorities for any other possible committed crime. example tax evasion. Not having a valid licence, outstanding fines, checking ownership of the vehicle. Forensic checking, finger printing etc. Criminals normally have an arrogant stance in their life style and this will be an ideal way of catching up with them.
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Getting tough on crime
quick poll
Question

If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?

Answer