Insurance accounting: change on the horizon

01 August 2007 FAnews

Barry Stott, Partner in Assurance at PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), explains the draft paper on accounting that is expected to ensure consistency and comparability in the insurance industry and highlights the consequences for the various insurance sectors.

PwC welcomes the discussion paper of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on insurance accounting as it will improve comparability in the industry as well as between countries. This discussion paper (Preliminary Views on Insurance Contracts) will lead to a single global standard which would make annual financial statements of insurance companies more relevant and reliable, something that financial analysts have been wanting for several years now.


Insurance industry participants and professionals should seize the opportunity to comment on the discussion paper as once it is in exposure draft format it becomes more difficult to change and accommodate comments.

Change in current systems

Insurance companies need to become familiar with the proposed accounting treatments contained in the discussion paper as it will take time to change their financial systems and construct a history of data that may be required when new accounting treatments take effect.


A major change proposed that will affect short term insurers is the new requirement to discount contracts. This impacts especially those contracts that have a longer term horizon such as marine, construction or liability insurance. These insurers would have to measure future cash flows from these contracts at 'best estimate' and then account for the time value of money at an appropriate discount rate.


For long-term insurers, the method of accounting for risk margins would change. In SA at present, compulsory margins are added to contract valuations and companies have the discretion to add further discretionary margins to allow for profit release as the insurer is released from risk. In future this risk margin would be calculated by determining what another industry player would price the insurance book at if they had to take it over.

The discussion paper is also favouring what is known as the 'current exit value' measurement method, also preferred by world-wide insurance industry regulators, as opposed to the 'current entry value' method frequently used in practice and preferred by industry forums in Europe.

PwC will be submitting a global firm comment to the IASB, due by November 2007. The paper is expected to generate much interest and even controversy, with some members of the IASB already taking different views on certain issues.

Quick Polls


How confident are you that insurers treat policyholders fairly, according to the Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) principles?


Very confident, insurers prioritise fair treatment
Somewhat confident, but improvements are needed
Not confident, there are significant issues with fair treatment
fanews magazine
FAnews June 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Understanding prescription in claims for professional negligence
Climate change… the single biggest risk facing insurers
Insuring the unpredictable: 2024 global election risks
Financial advice crucial as clients’ Life policy premiums rise sharply
Guiding clients through the Two-Pot Retirement System
There is diversification, and true diversification – choose wisely
Decoding the shift in investment patterns
Subscribe now