orangeblock

Dissolving a testamentary trust

24 April 2013 | Life Insurance | General | Fiona Zerbst

Given that we are not experts in all fields within the financial services industry, we decided that it would make sense to open up a professional forum and have some of your questions answered here. FAnews is therefore encouraging readers to pose question

FAnews received a query from a reader who is a trustee and beneficiary of a testamentary trust which was set up when his father died in 1988. “The trust had no income, nor any capital goods, such as property investments, but had motor cars, furniture and so on, which have over the years been used by the beneficiaries and have now depreciated to zero value for tax purposes,” the reader says.

He asked how the trust can be dissolved since it no longer serves a useful purpose.

FAnews asked Louis Venter, joint head of fiduciary advice, wealth and investment cluster, RMB Private Bank, to explain how such a trust can be dissolved.

Reasons for terminating a trust

As with companies and CCs, a trust mostly has a perpetual existence that is not attached to the life-and-death battle which the creator or the beneficiaries deal with. However, a trust is not as perpetual as one would think and a number of reasons might trigger the death of a trust. “Lately, legislative changes have either forced a trust to implode or have raised the question if trusts should not be reconsidered and, where deemed appropriate, be given a death sentence,” says Venter.

He says that more natural reasons for the termination of trusts are typically one of the following:

* The amount left in the trust makes it uneconomical to continue with the trust and the beneficiaries are better off managing the assets in their own estates or rather receiving income from a single premium annuity purchased for them by the trustees, from the trust funds.

* The trust has served its purpose and either the trust deed dictates that one should call it a day, or the trustees makes this decision and transfer the assets to the beneficiaries.

* A trust might fail due to the purpose it was set up for is no longer reachable or all the beneficiaries might have passed away already.

* The trustees just decide they have had enough and put the trust ‘to the sword’.

“From a legislative point of view, we have seen two recent disruptions in the otherwise peaceful life span of trusts,” says Venter. SARS has granted a window period for the transfer of residential property from a trust and once the property has been transferred the trust must terminate within six months. This is a non-negotiable term and one that must be complied with. Then, the latest comments in the annual budget speech have, of course, sparked fears of a punitive tax dispensation for housing assets in a trust. “We have yet to see the draft legislation, but the words expressed in the budget do seem troubling.”

The process of terminating a trust

In all the above cases, including that of our reader, the same process needs to be followed when terminating a trust.

* The trustees must sign a resolution containing the reasons of the decision the trust is terminated.

* All assets must be transferred from the trust to the beneficiaries and all debts paid so as to leave the trust devoid of any assets. The trustees must confirm this fact in a resolution.

* The trust bank account needs to be closed and proof of this needs to be at hand. If the trust did not have a bank account (which it should have had!) the fact must be declared under oath by the trustees.

* All beneficiaries must sign a letter stating that they know about the closure of the trust and that they feel they have received their fair share. This is quite a tricky requirement to adhere to in many cases.

* The accountant of the trust must confirm in writing that the trust has neither assets nor liabilities and that the final steps of deregistering the trust will be undertaken by the accountant (like deregistering with SARS).

* Documents 1 to 5 needs to be submitted to the Master of the High Court, in whose jurisdiction the trust was created, together with the original letter of authority (as an affidavit stating that it is lost) and the certified IDs of all trustees and beneficiaries.

“All the beneficiaries need to agree to the distributions and closure of the trust,” Venter says. “If the trust still has minors or the will does not allow for the termination of the trust, the trust can be closed based on the fact that it has served its purpose.”

In the event that a trust’s liabilities exceed its assets, one needs to sequestrate a trust in terms of the Insolvency Act, which is a totally different process.

Editor’s thoughts: Do you have a particular matter you would like to see addressed on the FAnews website? Comment below or email fiona@fanews.co.za. Also, if you believe you may be able to answer questions, drop us an e-mail with your relevant field/s of expertise.

Comments

Added by Leon Boshoff, 27 Mar 2018
My sister and I are the only beneficiaries of my mothers testamentary trust. It consists of money and 2 properties and it is set to pay out half we turn 25 and then again when we 35. The problem is that I want to immigrate and require the money to do so. Is there a way for me to get my half of the trust with out disturbing my sisters half?
Report Abuse
Added by Colleen Brookes, 12 Oct 2017
my mom left my portion of her estate in a testamentary trust. I'm the beneficiary of the trust and have two children over the age of 18. There are 4 trustees. The estate is not worth a fortune and is only cash, no fixed assets, properties etc. I'm 58 and trustees are similar age. Are we able to terminate the trust as it has no real purpose.
Any thoughts would be appreciated
Report Abuse
Added by Louise, 03 Oct 2017
What happens in the case of a testamentary trust the beneficiary is not interested to meet two of the trustees and due to that the two refuse to release funds for the beneficiaries studies who turned 21 already
Report Abuse
Added by Jeremy, 24 Apr 2013
When attempting to close a testamentary trust recently, the Master's office demanded an additional requirement which didn't really make sense to us and is causing some difficulties. The Will of the deceased made some small bequests of cash to a couple of his domestic employees and the residue of the estate to a Testamentary Trust for distribution to various beneficiaries. The Trust fulfilled its mandate, has paid out all amounts due to beneficiaries of the trust and must now be terminated. The Master has demanded that a letter be obtained from the legatees (i.e. the recipients of the cash bequests which were paid out directly from the Estate before the estate was wound up), a letter stating "that they have received all that was due to them and that they are satisfied that the Trust be terminated". This is being demanded despite the fact that these benificiaries of the estate (not the Trust) have supplied letters of acquitance to the Executor of the Estate previously. This additional rquirement is causing problems because it is thought that one of the domestic workers has also since died, but proof of this cannot be obtained as we have no contact details and the trail has "run dead". The other legatee is unwilling to sign any disclaimer on the Trust, as he now thinks that there is a possibilty that he might be able get some extra benefit from the Trust. Would anyone know why the Master's office would be asking for this extra requirement or whether it is because of someone's lack of experience in the Master's office?
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Dissolving a testamentary trust
quick poll
Question

What is the biggest constraint stopping insurers from letting AI agents or solutions take over complex human-led underwriting decisions?

Answer