Explore the Category
A Michigan US appeals court found that the insurer had no duty to defend or indemnify a solar power company in a lawsuit over its allegedly shoddy installation of solar panels because the general liability policy did not provide cover where only the policyholder’s own work was damaged. Damage to their own work on the solar array that the insured was paid to construct does not constitute an accidental “occurrence.”
The January 2016 determination of the Ombud for Financial Service Providers in Johannes William van Breda v Alesio Mogentale & Another is a good reminder of the powers of the Ombud where an FSP fails to respond to a complaint made against it.
Subject to the provisions of the policy, the fact that a loss or occurrence insured against is caused by the insured’s negligence is irrelevant. This applies to all negligent acts, even those that are grossly negligent. It also holds true for so-called reckless conduct, if the recklessness involved is nothing other than gross negligence.
The December 2015 determination of the Ombud for Financial Service Providers in De Hoop Steenwerwe v Finmar Makelaars reminds us of the duties imposed on FSPs by the FAIS Act and the FAIS General Code.
If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?