Explore the Category
A resolution in favour of one of three trustees by which he was ‘authorised to sign the necessary documentation’ could not be construed as a general authority to enter into contracts. In the context it was held that this resolution only authorised the purchase of a farm and the authorised signatory was not entitled to enter into other business agreements with the defendant.
A New Jersey appeals court held that a contractor’s lawsuit against the insurer demanding cover for a claim against the contractors arising from a construction defect was barred because the claim should have been brought in a previous lawsuit that had freed the insurer from any duty to defend the third party claim.
Where a policy aggregated claims for ‘similar acts or omissions in a series of related matters or transactions’ the enquiry was whether there was a real connection between the transactions in which they occurred.
The insured subcontracted a builder to build 53 prefabricated modular units for its residential blindness rehabilitation facility. The insurer denied an indemnity for water damage under a partly completed roof saying that the applicable exclusion barred coverage for ‘that particular part’ of property on which the policyholder or its subcontractors ‘are performing operations’.
What do you believe will be the biggest challenge when the COFI framework is finally implemented?