FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Legal Affairs
SUB CATEGORIES General | 

Temporary removal clause in policies

08 April 2016 Craig Woolley, Norton Rose Fulbright
Craig Woolley from Norton Rose Fulbright.

Craig Woolley from Norton Rose Fulbright.

Insurers are often faced with claims for stock which has been damaged whilst being temporarily held at premises other than the risk address. The temporary removal clause provides cover for property insured whilst temporarily removed from the risk address or location to other premises including whilst in transit. The words “temporarily removed” in relation to stock means “taken away for a short time with the intention of returning it”.

In an unreported February 2007 case of CNS Agents & Distributors CC vs Nova Risk Partners Ltd (Durban High Court, case number AR 254/2006; judgment 16 February 2007), the court held that for stock to fall under the temporary removal clause it would have to, in the first place, have been accepted as such for storage at the risk address and, secondly, to have been removed for safekeeping elsewhere pending its return for continued storage at the risk address.

The insured was stocking up for Christmas in October 2003 and the stock was delivered by truck to its insured premises, entered as stock in its accounting systems and then forwarded to other premises used by it from time to time elsewhere. In these circumstances, said the court, there was no temporary removal. The insured was not entitled, for the premium paid for stock which it accommodated at the risk address, to insurance cover for stock which it had no intention of storing at its main premises. Stock first delivered to and kept at overflow premises is not covered by the temporary removal clause.

First published by Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

What is your one-liner for the 2024 National Budget speech?

ANSWER

Creepy failure to adjust income tax, medical tax credits
Overall happy, it should support economic growth
Overall unhappy, soaring public sector wages and broken SOEs suck..
There are too few taxpayers, too many grant recipients.
fanews magazine
FAnews February 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

On the insurance industry’s radar in 2024
Insurers, risk managers unsure of AI’s judgement credentials
Is offshore the place to be in 2024?
Gap claims: erosion of medical benefits, soaring specialist fees
Investments and retirement… is conventional wisdom under threat?
Subscribe now