Category Legal Affairs

South Africans soon to be forced to consider mediation before turning to courts

20 August 2019 Gillan and Veldhuizen Incorporated
PJ Veldhuizen, Managing Director of Gillan and Veldhuizen Incorporated

PJ Veldhuizen, Managing Director of Gillan and Veldhuizen Incorporated

The Rules Board for Courts of Law has issued a draft rule proposing a new Rule that will compel South Africans to declare that they have considered mediation as a solution to any forthcoming legal matter and, if not, the court itself is obligated to manage cases effectively and recommend mediation as a dispute resolution if it deems it appropriate.

Mediation, which was introduced in South Africa as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), is a time- and cost-effective means whereby parties to a dispute can appoint a qualified neutral third party to act as mediator to facilitate an agreed settlement. The mediator facilitates discussions between the parties, assisting them in identifying issues, clarifying priorities, exploring areas of compromise and generating options to resolve the dispute.

Following countries such as the USA, UK and Australia, South Africa have recognised mediation as an effective method of resolving differences. Recent case law in the UK has set out that ADR should be strongly encouraged and prescribes when ADR is an appropriate mechanism. South Africa will soon follow suit as the proposed rule, Rule 41A, will require the practising representative attorney to declare before the court that he/she has advised his/her client to consider mediation as a means of attempting to resolve the dispute which is the subject of the proposed proceedings. The rule will require the parties, when issuing summons or application or delivering a plea or answering affidavit, to indicate whether they consider mediation to be possible and to give reasons for their consideration. Failing to do so could result in penalisation by way of costs orders.

PJ Veldhuizen, managing director of Gillan and Veldhuizen Incorporated and a practising commercial mediation, says that the new proposed rule will “effect a much-needed easing-off of pressure on South African courts and legal process, not to mention the costs of legal representation.”

Attorneys should be advising clients to consider mediation as a possible resolution not only because of the financial benefits but also to save themselves a lot of unnecessary time delays in resolving matters. Veldhuizen stresses that disputing parties going the ADR route must make certain that, their mediator is qualified and reputable.

Quick Polls


Is 30 the new 65?


Yes, it is becoming inevitable that retirees need to save for a 30 year time horizon when it comes to retirement
No, why change a model that has been working for many years
At least if a retiree reinvests their pot of cash compound interest will resolve the longevity problem
A E fanews magazine
FAnews August 2019 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Create designer policies through AI
Are advisers in a precarious position?
A claim, COIDA and a dog bite
Non-disclosure never an innocent fraud
Prescribed assets: The threat to pensions
Cannabis and the issue of trust
Getting the most from disability claims
Subscribe now