FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Legal Affairs
SUB CATEGORIES General | 

Russian roulette is self-inflicted injury not suicide (US)

08 October 2019 Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright
Patrick Bracher

Patrick Bracher

A Texas court held that the insurers did not have to pay the death claim for a teenager who died when he pulled the trigger of a revolver with the barrel in his mouth and one bullet in the cylinder killed him instantly, because it was excluded by the policy exclusion for death caused directly or indirectly by self-inflicted injury.

The court determined that – regardless of the fact that the boy’s death was classified as a suicide by the medical examiner – ‘suicide’ was a red herring and the proper exclusion to apply was that of self-inflicted injury. The question whether it was a deliberate suicide did not have to be examined.

The court also found that the injuries were not unforeseen and unexpected, as required by an accident policy. The possible consequences of pulling the trigger of a loaded gun are neither unforeseen nor unexpected. The claim for $75 000 was dismissed.

The case is Freeman v Securian Life Insurance Co.

 

First published by: Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot

Quick Polls

QUESTION

The latest salvo in the active versus passive debate suggests that passive has an edge in highly efficient markets, or where the share universe is relatively small. In this context, how do you approach SA Equity investing?

ANSWER

Active always, the experts know best
Active, but favour the smaller funds
Passive for the win
Strike a balance between the two
fanews magazine
FAnews October 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

The township economy: an overlooked insurance market
FSCA regulates crypto assets: a new era for investors
Building trust: one epic client experience at a time
Two-Pot System rollout underlines the value of financial advice
The future looks bright for construction
Subscribe now