Proceedings before enforcement committee under Security Services Act apply civil standard of proof

12 October 2017Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright
Patrick Bracher

Patrick Bracher

The appellants in Pather v Financial Services Board failed in the suggestion that claims against it of contravention of the Security Services Act 2004 should have been proved by the enforcement committee according to the criminal standard, namely beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that the civil standard applies and that the proceedings and penalty imposed are administrative in nature.

The appellants had published financial statements on the Stock Exchange News Services (SENS) which they knew or ought to have known were false.

They challenged the finding against them on the basis that it should have been proved beyond reasonable doubt that they had such knowledge. It was held that the civil standard applied and the facts had only to be proved on a balance of probabilities.

Because the proceedings and penalty are of an administrative nature, they may be reviewed in a court on grounds of unlawfulness, procedural unfairness or unreasonableness. The finding and penalty were upheld.

First published by: Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot

Quick Polls


Millennials make up 30% of the South African job market; these are your clients and future clients. Do you engage with them?


No, not my target audience
Yes, the same as all my other clients
Yes, via social media
Some engagement but by far the most difficult generation to engage with
AE fanews magazine
FAnews August 2018 EditionGet the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

The value of being an FPI Member
Blockchain… the compliance silver bullet?
What constitutes fair treatment?
It will never happen to me
A new era of value-added services
Expert advice leads to proper protection
Subscribe now