FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
SUB CATEGORIESGeneral | 

No insurance for sexual assault suit against employer because not accidental (US)

17 March 2017Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright
Patrick Bracher from Norton Rose Fulbright.

Patrick Bracher from Norton Rose Fulbright.

A Maryland court has ruled that the insurer does not have to defend the operator of a rock-climbing gym in a lawsuit which alleged that it negligently failed to prevent two of its coaches from sexually assaulting a teenage climber.

The lawsuit alleged that the company knew that the coaches had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviour and failed to take steps to prevent the assaults. Because the claim alleged that the employer had knowledge of the predatory conduct before the assault, there was no accidental occurrence that could give rise to an obligation to indemnify the legal costs of the proceedings.

Insurance is there to protect unforeseen and fortuitous losses.

(The case isEarth Treks Inc. v Gemini Insurance Co, case number 1:16-cv-02520, in the US District Court for the District of Maryland)

First published by Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

The FSB is thinking of scrapping Level II Regulatory Exam (which would have tested product knowledge) in favour of an approach that forces insurers to train staff and monitor their actions. Do you agree with this approach?

ANSWER

Yes. The Level II Regulatory Exams were a massive headache for those who had to write them
No. At least with the exams you knew who were the top achievers. A lot of trust now needs to be given to insurers.
AE fanews magazine
FAnews June 2017 EditionGet the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

FIA Awards… a whole new journey
Old Mutual Insure steps out of the box
State intervention for microinsurance: justifiable?
Big Data; the new ‘oil’
SA – a fallen angel? Investing in a junk status economy
Subscribe now