FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
SUB CATEGORIESGeneral | 

No insurance for sexual assault suit against employer because not accidental (US)

17 March 2017Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright
Patrick Bracher from Norton Rose Fulbright.

Patrick Bracher from Norton Rose Fulbright.

A Maryland court has ruled that the insurer does not have to defend the operator of a rock-climbing gym in a lawsuit which alleged that it negligently failed to prevent two of its coaches from sexually assaulting a teenage climber.

The lawsuit alleged that the company knew that the coaches had a history of sexually inappropriate behaviour and failed to take steps to prevent the assaults. Because the claim alleged that the employer had knowledge of the predatory conduct before the assault, there was no accidental occurrence that could give rise to an obligation to indemnify the legal costs of the proceedings.

Insurance is there to protect unforeseen and fortuitous losses.

(The case isEarth Treks Inc. v Gemini Insurance Co, case number 1:16-cv-02520, in the US District Court for the District of Maryland)

First published by Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

A few years ago, clients had to prove themselves to insurers. Things have changed. Do you believe the onus of proof lies with the insurer today?

ANSWER

Yes
No
It depends
AE fanews magazine
FAnews April 2018 EditionGet the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

New draft premium collection legislation
Insurers… close to sleep deprivation
Disability cases are not for amateurs
A rethink of product strategies
Will retirement really last a lifetime?
Subscribe now