Category Legal Affairs

Maritime claim jurisdiction over freight forwarders demand guarantee

15 April 2016 Carol Holness, Norton Rose SA
Carol Holness from Norton Rose Fulbright.

Carol Holness from Norton Rose Fulbright.

A claim for payment under a demand guarantee that guarantees payment of clearing and forwarding fees is a maritime claim in terms of the Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act. This is so because it is a claim for payment “arising out of or relating to the remuneration of a forwarding agent”. Therefore the Gauteng High Court did not have jurisdiction to hear a dispute over the guarantee because it was an “inland court”. Courts with an area of jurisdiction that is not adjacent to the territorial waters of South Africa only have admiralty jurisdiction under the Act over limited types of maritime claims which do not include claims relating to the remuneration of a forwarding agent.

The court considered both the ordinary grammatical meaning and the apparent intention of the legislature to cast the proverbial wide net to ensure that all issues that are connected with admiralty issues are decided by the coastal courts that have admiralty jurisdiction.

The case is Kuehne & Nagel (Pty) Ltd v Moncada Energy Group SRL

First published by Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot.

Quick Polls


What is your one-liner for the 2024 National Budget speech?


Creepy failure to adjust income tax, medical tax credits
Overall happy, it should support economic growth
Overall unhappy, soaring public sector wages and broken SOEs suck..
There are too few taxpayers, too many grant recipients.
fanews magazine
FAnews February 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

On the insurance industry’s radar in 2024
Insurers, risk managers unsure of AI’s judgement credentials
Is offshore the place to be in 2024?
Gap claims: erosion of medical benefits, soaring specialist fees
Investments and retirement… is conventional wisdom under threat?
Subscribe now