Category Legal Affairs

Insurer not liable for claim settled without consent

06 May 2016 Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright
Patrick Bracher from Norton Rose Fulbright.

Patrick Bracher from Norton Rose Fulbright.

An insured lead mining company settled a pollution suit for $55 million without inviting the insurer to participate in the deal. The insurer was therefore not liable to pay the claim.

According to the policy, the insured was required to consult the insurers in settling claims. Although the insured advised the insurer that mediation to settle the claim was to take place, there was no suggestion that settlement was about to occur nor was the time and place of the mediation meeting given to the insurers.

The US court rejected the argument that the insurers should, on receipt of the letter, have come forward and participated in the settlement negotiations. They could hardly be expected to attend uninvited at a mediation at an undisclosed location, time and place.

(The Doe Run Resources Corp v The Fidelity & Casulty Co. of New York, case number G050689, in the court of Appeal of the State of California, Fourth Appellate District)

First published by Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot.

Quick Polls


What is your one-liner for the 2024 National Budget speech?


Creepy failure to adjust income tax, medical tax credits
Overall happy, it should support economic growth
Overall unhappy, soaring public sector wages and broken SOEs suck..
There are too few taxpayers, too many grant recipients.
fanews magazine
FAnews February 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

On the insurance industry’s radar in 2024
Insurers, risk managers unsure of AI’s judgement credentials
Is offshore the place to be in 2024?
Gap claims: erosion of medical benefits, soaring specialist fees
Investments and retirement… is conventional wisdom under threat?
Subscribe now