FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Legal Affairs
SUB CATEGORIES General | 

Fracking and insurance

17 March 2015 Norton Rose Fulbright
Donald Dinnie, Norton Rose Fulbright

Donald Dinnie, Norton Rose Fulbright

Insurers considering providing cover for hydraulic fracturing (fracking) should bear in mind the unique features of fracking which present both risks and opportunities. South African insurers have the benefit of experience from the United States for the pricing and limiting of risks.

South African insurers have the benefit of experience from the United States for the pricing and limiting of risks. Fracking may pose risks which are not present in conventional drilling methods.

More than 50 law suits involving hydraulic fracturing had been filed in the United States since 2009 although none has been tried to judgment.

Many of those cases involve class action law suits. Claimants are land owners who leased oil and gas rights, land owners with only surface rights, and land owners who reside in proximity to hydraulic fracturing operations. There have also been law suits based on increased seismic activity.

Insurers can also look to the London market which has been writing fracking risks.

First published by : Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot

Quick Polls

QUESTION

The latest salvo in the active versus passive debate suggests that passive has an edge in highly efficient markets, or where the share universe is relatively small. In this context, how do you approach SA Equity investing?

ANSWER

Active always, the experts know best
Active, but favour the smaller funds
Passive for the win
Strike a balance between the two
fanews magazine
FAnews October 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

The township economy: an overlooked insurance market
FSCA regulates crypto assets: a new era for investors
Building trust: one epic client experience at a time
Two-Pot System rollout underlines the value of financial advice
The future looks bright for construction
Subscribe now