Category Legal Affairs

Covid-19 business interruption claims and virus exclusions (USA)

10 January 2022 Donald Dinnie, Norton Rose Fulbright
Donald Dinnie, Norton Rose Fulbright

Donald Dinnie, Norton Rose Fulbright

While this Ohio Appellate Court judgment found that the insured did not suffer direct physical loss or damage so as to warrant coverage, it also considered the application of the virus exclusion in the policy

The exclusion reads: 

“We will not pay for loss or damage caused directly or indirectly by any of the following. Such loss or damage is excluded regardless of any other cause or event that contributes concurrently or in any sequence to the loss. These exclusions apply whether or not the loss event results

in widespread damage or affects a substantial area. 

j. Virus or Bacteria:

  1. Any virus, bacterium or other microorganism that induces or is capable of inducing physical distress, illness or disease.”

The court said that the exclusion is clear and unambiguous and excludes coverage for losses caused directly or indirectly by a virus. Even if government orders were in the causal chain of events leading to the insured’s loss, the exclusion applies because the policy language excludes loss caused “directly or indirectly” by the virus. The policy language sweeps aside the causation question.

The court pointed out that even if there were doubt, the policy applies the exclusion “regardless of any cause or event that contributed concurrently or in any sequence to the loss.” That wording deals with any concurrent causation difficulties which may otherwise have arisen.

Insurers would do well to reconsider their policy wordings where they wish to limit the indemnity to the insured peril only and to exclude uninsured concurrent causes.

Judgment: The Nail Nook Inc v Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. et al 2021-Ohio-4211

First publised by: Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot

Quick Polls


There are countless articles written about South Africa’s poor retirement outcomes. Which of the following would you single out as the biggest contributor to local savers not accumulating enough to buy an adequate and sustainable pension?


Lack of personal accountability
Poor participation in formal retirement funds
Reluctance to seek financial advice early on
SA’s high unemployment rate
fanews magazine
FAnews April 2022 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

The ethical core of insurance relationships
Debarment… a double whammy
A beginner’s guide to scaling the Tech Mountain
Leadership, climate and cybercrime… SA’s top risks
Unpacking the retirement reform developments
Subscribe now