KEEP UP TO DATE WITH ALL THE IMPORTANT COVID-19 INFORMATIONCOVID-19 RESOURCE PORTAL
FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Legal Affairs
SUB CATEGORIES General | 

Baby-sitting may be a “business” under an insurance policy exclusion and a word on ambiguity (US)

24 May 2022 Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright
Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright

Patrick Bracher, Norton Rose Fulbright

Baby-sitting may be a “business” under an insurance policy exclusion and a word on ambiguity (US)

In a tragic incident, a baby-sitter who received $25 per day when she provided home daycare services, was caring for a deceased infant who died while in her care from bedding asphyxia.  It was held that the baby-sitter did not have cover under her insurance policy which excluded liability for bodily injury “arising out of or in connection with a business engaged in by the insured”.  “Business” included a “trade, profession or occupation”.

An endorsement provided that if the insured “regularly provides home daycare services … and receives monetary or other compensation, that enterprise is a business”.  A court held that neither the word “regularly” nor “compensation” were ambiguous.  The care services provided by the baby-sitter were regular and she was paid for those services.  The policy covered the insured if the compensation was “reimbursement”.  It was not reimbursement because it was an amount paid for services and not for reimbursing expenses.

Ambiguity requires that the words are reasonably susceptible to multiple interpretations. A word is not ambiguous because the parties say a word is ambiguous.  There was no ambiguity in the wording.   The regular and compensated home daycare services qualified as a business under the relevant exclusion.

Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co v Kacy Clayton case no. 21-1665 US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

First published by : Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot

Quick Polls

QUESTION

We have watched with interest as each of the country’s large life insurers report their 2021 life claims statistics, with soaring claims and claims values. That got us thinking: how do the big life insurers compare against one another, from an IFA perspective?

ANSWER

An insurer is an insurer is an insurer
All are excellent: would not deal with them otherwise
There is one insurance brand that stands out for me
Tied agent: but my brand is the best out there
fanews magazine
FAnews June 2022 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

A free smoothie does not make a loyal customer
Consequential loss policy court cases
Everything you need to know about death, disability and severe illness cover post-emigration
Are advisers doing all they can for clients’ portfolios?
Financial advisers need help - navigating the complex ESG fund environment
Subscribe now