FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Investments

Global study reveals SA investors fail to stay invested through economic volatility

09 October 2019 Schroders
Doug Abbott, Schroders South Africa Country Head

Doug Abbott, Schroders South Africa Country Head

SA investor behaviour could erode savings as geo-political tensions mount

While the ebbs and flows of markets are always going to keep investors on their toes, it appears South African investors may be too quick to chop and change their portfolios during times of heightened economic uncertainty and market volatility. And as growing geo-political tensions show that volatility isn’t going anywhere quickly, knee-jerk reactions are likely to be detrimental for investors’ portfolios and ultimately lead to disappointing investment returns.

This is according to Doug Abbott, Schroders South Africa Country Head, who refers to the Schroders Global Investor Study 2019, which after surveying over 25,000 investors1 across 32 countries, revealed that the majority made immediate changes to the risk profile of their investments during the volatile final three months of 2018.

“The end of 2018 was a particularly volatile time for not only the South African economy, but also the broader global economy, with the MSCI World index of global equities falling sharply amid rising geopolitical risk and growing concerns for the global economy. In response to this market volatility, 74% of South African investors made changes to their portfolio’s risk profile.”

Interestingly, Abbott notes, the nature of the portfolio changes made by South African respondents in response to the period of heightened instability were quite fragmented. “The study shows that South African investors are equally likely to decrease (41%) or increase (39%), the overall risk profile of their investments in response to market volatility. Furthermore, 27% moved some or a significant proportion of their portfolio into cash.

“Ultimately, this implies that people became fearful and made hasty investments decisions – something that is never advisable to do,” he adds.

These rushed portfolio switches undoubtedly contributed to the short-term investment approach that many South African investors appear to be taking, says Abbott. “The study shows that the average South African investment horizon is 2.8 years, but 39% of local investors stay invested for less than a year, which is similar globally (2.6 years and 41%, respectively).

“Breaking the results up demographically, we found that South African millennials2 appear to be less patient than older generations, holding their investments for an average of 2.2 years compared to the 3.8-year average holding period for baby boomers3 and a 4.4-year average for Gen X4.”

According to Abbott, most experts advise against investing in shares for any period shorter than three years. “Some even say it should be no less than five years. This is because it’s not possible to read the market (without the aid of a crystal ball) and in any shorter period there is less time to win back any losses.”

Based on the belief that geopolitical risk isn’t going away any time soon, Abbott urges investors to take a longer view – even during periods of heightened uncertainty. “With the rise of China, as well as the rise of populism, it is our view that geopolitical risk is set to continue plaguing markets on a global level. Locally, political risk continues to be a major factor, which ties into regulatory uncertainty and ongoing exchange rate instability.”

Abbott says that while ignoring these risks and remaining invested for longer may mean greater volatility over the short term, this strategy is likely to leave investors better off in the long run. “Instead of chopping and changing portfolios in times of heightened volatility, it is therefore critical to look through the uncertainty: our goal at Schroders is therefore to deliver investment solutions that reflect investors’ needs through time and which also suit their risk appetites,” he concludes.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

No developing economy has ever built a single-payer complementary NHI equivalent covering the entire population. NHI promises comprehensive care but it is also 100% free at the point-of-service. Is this practical?

ANSWER

It is doable but collaboration is key
South Africa is not in a position to build NHI
The only conclusion possible is that the private healthcare sector is not going to disappear or change
There is little chance that the NHI will be able to receive significant government funding
A E fanews magazine
FAnews August 2019 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Create designer policies through AI
Are advisers in a precarious position?
A claim, COIDA and a dog bite
Non-disclosure never an innocent fraud
Prescribed assets: The threat to pensions
Cannabis and the issue of trust
Getting the most from disability claims
Subscribe now