Category Investments

150-billion a year is a small price to pay for Africa’s youth to inherit the world

17 June 2021 Sanlam Investments

Investment in critical infrastructure is non-negotiable for Africa and South Africa to battle climate change and overcome social challenges such as inequality and poverty. “The sustainable allocation of investment capital to meet environmental and social needs will ensure that our children inherit a world that is worth inheriting,” said Nersan Naidoo, CEO of Sanlam Investments.

He was commenting during a lively discussion, on how investment managers can help governments address infrastructure backlogs through sustainable investment.

The first of three “Critical Conversations” planned by Sanlam Investments for 2021 was held on 14 June, just days before South Africa’s annual Youth Day celebrations. It was aptly titled: “The South African investment opportunity”.

And what better gift to the country’s youth than to explore ways to lift infrastructure spending to the $150 billion per annum needed for Africa to meet the United Nations’ 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030.

Infrastructure investing encompasses a range of big-ticket items that support economic activity and improve quality of life, ranging from mega-projects for national electricity and transportation to the local provision of clinics, hospitals, schools and water and sanitation services. Nowadays, the focus on environmental and societal issues adds a layer of complexity to investment decision making. “Climate change is an issue, but we must find ways to spend on infrastructure that both improves access to the broader economy and eliminates inequality,” said Andile Khumalo, CEO of KhumaloCo.

Andrew Johnstone, CEO at Climate Fund Managers, said that sustainable investing was about striking a balance between the usage and replenishment of the planet’s resources. This has become a huge challenge to South Africa, where one of the major economic constraints is also one of its major climate change challenges. “The reality is that many African economies rely on fossil fuels to operate,” said Nersan Naidoo, as the discussion turned to South Africa’s ongoing electricity crisis.

There is massive potential in electricity production and distribution across Africa, and it is hoped that the recent announcement allowing South African firms to invest in power infrastructure with up to 100MW capacity will result in a flood of new infrastructure investment opportunities. It was noted that South Africa would eventually have to replace 65000MW of coal-fired power with sustainable alternatives, opening a staggering project pipeline. And the funds should be available if projects are sensibly motivated.

Johnstone said there are trillions of dollars invested globally in zero-interest accounts that could be better invested in infrastructure opportunities. He suggested that African infrastructure programmes use a blended finance model to achieve swifter uptake of projects. The government provides funding for the infrastructure build phase and the private sector stepping in to manage projects through their life cycle. This de-risking of projects by the government is seen as a great motivator for private sector capital to flow to otherwise risky projects.

The new way of assessing long-term investments will go beyond simple risk and return calculations to consider impact. “We have to start seeing the world through the dual lens of financial return and positive impact, and sustainable investing is about delivering a financial return to people by investing their assets to deliver a positive impact,” said Nersan Naidoo. The good news is that impact exists in truckloads of infrastructure projects, from the small to the large, and across state-funded, private sector funded and private-public partnership (PPP) initiatives.

“Sustainable investing is about the consistent delivery of services that are accessible, affordable and reliable,” said Euvin Naidoo, Faculty: Harvard Business School, who spoke in his personal capacity. He added that investment decisions had to be taken for the long-term with proper attention to de-risking each project from the get-go. A great way to achieve this is by putting the decision-making power associated with infrastructure in the hands of the end-user.

“Programmes work better than projects,” said Johnstone. “Government should be responsible for programmes and let the public sector handle projects; then empower the users by letting them fund the project”.

Khumalo agreed that the pressure to invest sustainably should come from asset owners, the members of pension funds, rather than benevolent asset managers. “As a pension fund member, I want to know what the fund managers are doing about the environment, what they are doing to address poverty and build infrastructure,” he said.

The panel reflected on the many ‘shining lights’ in African infrastructure development, referring to the decision by mobile phone companies to build a GSM network across the continent. The wide penetration of mobile phones across the continent has been hailed as a major underpin for economic growth. From a South African context, one need only step into the international arrivals terminal at OR Tambo International, or take a trip on the Gautrain, to appreciate the potential in infrastructure investment.

If the government comes on board with the correct policy framework and allocators of capital heed the sentiment of their investors, then there is no telling the future we can build. Khumalo took things a step further, urging business to make all investment decisions for the better good. “The private sector are influencers and decision-makers in the allocation of capital; what is the point of business if the money we allocate and decisions we make do not serve society,” he concluded.

“We must approach our infrastructure challenges with awareness and introspection,” concluded Naidoo. “If we want our youth to enjoy a sustainable future, then we cannot afford to defer action on investing with impact, to address climate change, inequality and other structural issues.”

Quick Polls


Healthcare brokers have long complained about inflation-plus medical scheme contribution increases; but pandemic may have changed things. What will pandemic-induced changes in hospital utilisation do to medical scheme contribution increase patterns?


Below inflation increase for 2022, then back to inflation-plus
Long-term trend of below inflation increases
Inflation-linked hikes for 2022, then back to inflation-plus
This is a 2-year hiccup, inflation-plus increase trend remains in place
fanews magazine
FAnews June 2021 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Broker and insurer collaboration should not be a one-way street
Running on outdated systems… There's risks
Policy wordings with respect to COVID-19
Death or divorce... how best to split assets
Ethical investing… principles and moral codes
Portfolio positioning will serve investors well
Subscribe now