FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES

Not all fat cats…

15 August 2004 Angelo Coppola

(15.8.04) The South African Financial Services Intermediaries Association (SAFSIA) has had a go at disparaging advertising by a direct insurer.

The case in point was a recent complaint lodged by SAFSIA, which the Advertising Standards Authority of SA (ASA) Directorate found in favour of SAFSIA against a Dial Direct billboard.

The billboard depicted generic brokers as "fat cats", creating the impression of brokers unfairly charging fees, and being unfairly wealthy as a result of unnecessary charges levied.

"While insurance brokers  are not opposed to alternative distribution channels, as each has its place in the market, we oppose any advertising which focuses on misleading advertising as well as disparaging advertising which discredits insurance brokers," says Davidson.

He adds that SAFSIA has noted that certain direct insurers have persisted with such disparaging advertising campaigns, despite previous rulings by the ASA, and SAFSIA will continue to be diligent in challenging ongoing violations of ASA regulations.

In terms of the ASA ruling, the respondent was required to withdraw the advertisement within a period of two weeks.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

The NHI is steamrollering ahead with a 2028 implementation mooted. How do you feel about the future of medical schemes and private healthcare under this solution?

ANSWER

Anxious about losing comprehensive coverage.
Confident the private sector will adapt.
Concerned about the lack of clarity.
Neutral, waiting to see how it unfolds.
fanews magazine
FAnews November 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Understanding treaty reinsurance – and the factors that influence it
Insurance brokers: the PI scapegoat
Medical Schemes' average increases for 2025
AI is revolutionising insurance claims processing and fraud detection
Crypto arbitrage: exploring the opportunities and risks
Subscribe now