orangeblock

Moonstone: Outsurance advert banned

04 September 2009 | Intermediaries / Brokers | General | Moonstone

Hereunder is an extract from the Advertising Standards Authority webpage:

The advertising agency The Firehouse, on behalf of Mutual and Federal, lodged a competitor complaint against Outsurance’s campaign highlighting the benefits of insuring through Outsurance. In each commercial, a customer is seen having their insurance or claim approved. Three gentlemen appear in the background laughing with an evil tone saying things such as “they think they have fixed excess, little do they know...” or “let’s make her wait ...” another man stops them and clarifies some of the hidden conditions.

The commercial ends highlighting one of the following aspects with regard to its insurance offers:

• Excess is fixed;
• Excess will not increase with the value of claims;
• Guaranteed premium for 12 months even if you claim;
• Stock is covered in full against theft;
• No compulsory waiting period for claims.

COMPLAINT
The complainant argued that it is also able to offer their clients the same benefits that Outsurance is claiming to have. The respondent’s campaign is giving the insurance industry as whole a bad reputation and portraying it in negative light. The respondent’s campaign insinuates that it is the only insurance company that offers clients those services, which is not true.

RELEVANT CLAUSES OF THE CODE OF ADVERTISING PRACTICE
In light of the complaint the following clauses of the Code were taken into account:

• Section II, Clause 4.2.1 – Misleading claims

• Section II, Clause 6 – Disparagement

RESPONSE
The respondent submitted that the television and radio commercials that are the subject of the complaint have been discontinued, in order to make way for its “Staff Helping SA OUT” campaign. The commercials will not be flighted again in its current format, and the print advertisements which compliment the television advertisement have also been discontinued and will no longer be used again in future, except for those advertisements which have been scheduled will appear for the last time.

ASA DIRECTORATE RULING
The ASA Directorate considered all the relevant documentation submitted by the respective parties.

The ASA has a long standing principle which holds that where an advertiser provides an unequivocal undertaking to withdraw or amend its advertising in a manner that addresses the concerns raised, the undertaking is accepted without considering the merits of the matter.

The Directorate is satisfied that the voluntary undertaking made by the respondent to discontinue using the campaign will effectively remedy the complaint.

The undertaking is therefore accepted on condition that the advertising is withdrawn in its current format within the deadlines stipulated in Clause 15.3 of the Procedural Guide, and is not used again in future.

While we applaud M & F, and cheer the result, the damage to the industry, which includes Outsurance, has been done.

At the risk of sounding like a stuck record; what happened to decent business ethics and good old-fashioned manners?

Comments

Added by Terry Nicholas, 28 Jul 2014
A comment: Outsurance's current (and no doubt costly) TV ad features a glaring error. It refers to a Winelands client as 'long-serving'. Clients do not serve. They meant to say 'long-standing'. It really jars.
Report Abuse
Added by Terry Nicholas, 28 Jul 2014
not a complaint - just a comment. The current (no doubt costly) TV ad for Outsurance features a glaring error. A Winelands client is referred to as 'long-serving'. Clients do not 'serve'! They meant to say 'long-standing' no doubt. It really jars.
Report Abuse
Added by Albert , 10 Mar 2011
The Biggest Issue that i have as a broker with the direct Insurers, is the TV and Radio adds being so misleading. Take in mind that this is the biggest form of information that Clients have about insurance... the adds they see and hear. You will see more and more clients saying "ya but i saw that on the TV why cant you do that". Insurable intrest and Ncb's and cash backs and excess waivers... all these things are subject to..., but the small print is so small you cant read it on the TV screen. Raised excesses to lower premiums not fully explained and market values on vehicle when the client clearly does not know the dif between Retail and Market... but the carrot of the cheap premium is lured infront of him. Bring me a client that reads his policy wording after that call...and understands this fully when he does. By attacking the brokers in adds and promoting "cutting fees", they are promoting "cutting the knowlege out of the market". We spend thousands staying acredited, while staff with min credits sell policies via phone. As a broker i ask you to call a call centre and ask some more serious qeustions... they will um and aa. I recently came across a truck on a Private policy with outsurance... how does that happen ?? i don't think i need say more....
Report Abuse
Added by NATASHA, 01 Feb 2010
I have to admit that I really find all these comments amusing. Miway takes the mickey out of OUTsurance and Dial Direct yet no one complains. Dial Direct does the same. As mush as I found those ads silly it's even sillier to attack OUtsurance because they were not referring to one particular insurance company.
Report Abuse
Added by Yvonne, 05 Jan 2010
Nothing has been more fustrating then having to watch that outsurance ad and its lies - They purposely attacked the Big 3 companies and needed to be taken a peg or two down. I personally will not insure with outsurance because of certain ads that were insulting to other insurers and brokers.
Report Abuse
Added by stuart, 06 Oct 2009
The new outsurance ad campaign the relaces the evil brokers is ethicly even worse as it implies the outsurance staff does more charitable work than brokers.
Report Abuse
Added by James, 22 Sep 2009
Allie, your line of reasoning suggests that we could then use pornography to get peoples attention then withdraw the ad after the people with moral fibre complain about it. There is also a distinctive line between taking the mickey and sending a defamatory message. Furthermore by suggesting that people only respond to crude advertising would imply that consumers do need parenting when it comes to the intake of information.
Report Abuse
Added by JM, 13 Sep 2009
OUTSURANCE RULING I am sick and tired of Outsurance. They retracted their advert, but the damage is done. They have done this kind of thing before. How do you tell 10 million people who watched the TV advert that thy have retracted their dishonest advert? The consumer will not know about it. They do this over and over again - trashing the brokers and insurance companies' integrity. I think that Mutual and Federal, Santam and Zurich ar cowards not to take them on.
Report Abuse
Added by Theo Swanepoel, 11 Sep 2009
It is not good enough to withdraw the offending Ad. The ASA should enforce the following: An advertiser should be made to pay for an advert on TV & radio stating that a particular advet was removed due to the incorrect content. This can act as a possible deterrent to future misleading ads. Now, we in the industry are aware of the facts. The Public - who is the the target market - is left under the impression that the advert is in order and their buying decisions are affected by what they have seen. Hence the impotance of a PUBLIC retraction.
Report Abuse
Added by Joseph, 10 Sep 2009
I am yet to hear about outsrurance giving good service. I have family that owns panelbeaters and towing companies and they never have anything good to say about Outsurance. I personally would never insure with them. I am glad to see that false advertising is not tolerated.
Report Abuse
Added by Mariaan, 10 Sep 2009
Kan ons asb 'n advertensie in die mark kry waar ons die waarheid op die tafel kry? Ek het 11 jaar gelede as makelaar begin en 'n k*ntrak by Outsurance gehad. Na ongeveer 2 jaar het hulle my laat weet hulle gaan nie meer van makelaars gebruik maak nie en het met my 'n "deal" gemaak rondom die behoud van my kliënte. Ons was dus goed genoeg om hulle aan die gang te kry en nou het hulle die arrogansie om teen ons daarbuite te adverteer!! Neem asb in ag dat die gewone man op straat se kennis van versekering absoluut minimaal is en daarom word hulle so maklik mislei!! Ek kry op 'n gereëlde basis kliënte wat van direkte versekeraars oorkom na my toe, a.g.v. 'n eis wat geweier word, of 'n absurde bybetaling of 'n skielike geweldige verhoging in premie!! Ons sal iets moet doen om die mense daar buite te waarsku teen hierdie wanpraktyke!!
Report Abuse
Added by Allie, 10 Sep 2009
Outsurance’s prices are exorbitant! However all these restricting boards & associations are ridiculous - give the South African public more credit, we are not robotic consumers who believe every word of every ad. Surely most people will understand that adverting is exactly that advertising. To the insurance companies offended by these ads, run a campaign taking the mickey out of your competitors; make us consumers sit up and take notice of your product by making us laugh. Stop hiding behind boards & associations. Truly what’s with society trying to parent grown people!!!!!!!!!!!!
Report Abuse
Added by Hein, 09 Sep 2009
This is a subject long overdue as it was brought to the attention of the Finacial Services Board long ago. The question that was put to the FSB: How can the FSB issue a license to a direct insurer who breaks down the immage of the short-term industry?
Report Abuse
Added by Kevin, 07 Sep 2009
As a broker, I feel that Outsurance through their ad has certainly placed the short-term insurance industry and therefore other short-term companies in a bad light. Should Outsurance not be compelled to rectify the damage that they have caused, through the false messages that they have sent?
Report Abuse
Added by Vanessa, 07 Sep 2009
I believe that the mere removal of the denigrating ad campaing of Outsurance's is not sufficnet to prevent them from repeating similar campaigns in the future. i would like to see the FSB imposing punitive fines as prevention is better than a toothless cure.
Report Abuse
Added by Morkel, 07 Sep 2009
It's about time! As Broker I'm sick of Direct Insurers making us out to be crooks. Santam & Mutual & Federal can always count on me.Proudly the Middleman.
Report Abuse
Added by Pieter, 07 Sep 2009
The problem with irrisponsible advertising like what Outsurance does, not only puts the broker in a bad light, but Outurance effectively tells the South African population "You are a bunch of imbeciles" And then the population reacts by supporting them. Makes you think
Report Abuse
Added by Jan, 07 Sep 2009
Well done for banning that ridiculous ad, outsurance are a very arrogant and imprudent company who have a terrible record of paying out claims... i would love to get my hands on the owner so i could show him what i think of his business ethics!
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Moonstone: Outsurance advert banned
quick poll
Question

If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?

Answer