orangeblock

Are IFAs ready for increased regulation, changing client behaviour?

20 June 2013 | | Fiona Zerbst

A great many independent financial planning practices in South Africa are operationally inefficient and lack the strategic thinking to allow them to deal with increasing regulation and shifting patterns of consumer behaviour – this is the verdict of Mike

Independent financial advisors fall within the small business fraternity here in South Africa, and their practices, like other businesses, need to grow, innovate and differentiate themselves to survive. They have to focus on what threatens their survival and confront it.

Although the electronic financial supermarket trend hasn’t quite caught on yet, IFAs need to consolidate their position while consumers favour personalised service. Adaptability will be the key to success as consumers become better informed and educated, more streetwise and more demanding.

“Client focus has shifted to the costs and performance of products, they have an overwhelming amount of information at their disposal and they are able to purchase investment and insurance products through intermediaries or directly on the internet,” Clare said. “IFAs with the strength of character and foresight to recognise that change is essential will quickly catch up with the high levels of service and professional advice offered by their international counterparts.”

Clare highlights the fact that lifestyle planning, vertical integration and co-opetition (co-operative competition) are trends that IFAs need to be aware of and integrate into their business models.

Partnerships with like-minded peers

Clare says that the change in the way the financial planning industry conducts business, will have positive effects – particularly as IFAs professionalise their practices, both strategically and operationally. “They should renew their focus on self-education and become aware of the value of relationship marketing, networking, partnership, customer delight, reputation management and consultative selling.”

He believes that IFAs who lock themselves into partnerships with like-minded peers (even across disciplines like accounting) and product providers that complement their businesses will stand out. He believes professional practices have the following winning attributes:

· A clearly defined business strategy formulated with the help of outside expertise.
· A clear vision, quantifiable business objectives and a plan that can be implemented.
· A culture of eliminating operational inefficiencies.
· A passion for developing themselves and their people.
· The aim to transform to a fee-based remuneration model.
· The ability to embrace technology as an ally, not a threat – they use technology at the point-of-sale and in the back-office.
· A habit of spending more time on their outboxes than their inboxes.
· A drive to grow their annuity income.
· Well-selected partners.

Clare also believes IFAs need to challenge the retail fee conundrum by offering clean pricing, free of confusing rebates and vague descriptions of underlying costs. Eliminating administration cost to clients is a further strategy.

Editor’s thoughts:
Threats to IFAs abound and as profit margins shrink they will either move back into a corporate environment or, if they do not do so, forge ahead but perhaps struggle to put their clients’ interests first. Yet it is critical that they do so to retain those clients. For this reason, having a sound long-term strategy and a clear idea of the quantum of their value will keep IFAs ahead of the curve. Do you agree with Clare’s assessments? Comment below or email fiona@fanews.co.za.

Comments

Added by Mike Clare, 26 Jun 2013
Hi old timer and AVN, am happy to liaise on email with you re this debate. gdub points out the essence of the article well. Your thoughts on his comments? Old timer, I am in favour of IFA's adapting their businesses and I am encouraging them to partner with companies that are striving for fair and transparent pricing. Perhaps the underlying message is that "independence" is not the ultimate destination and that practices must become " ïnterdependent" with product providers and other IFA practices.
Report Abuse
Added by Dub, 25 Jun 2013
@AVN - not sure what article you've been reading. Clare isn't saying anything about IFAs having to give up their independence. He isn't advocating the big heavies purchasing stakes in businesses and 'buying' loyalty. He's merely stating that, if you want to retain your independence, you'll need to find a partner that is prepared to work with you on all those elements that you feel (And that he's identified) are keeping your eye off the real ball - unbiased and appropriate advice to your deserving client base.
Report Abuse
Added by old timer, 22 Jun 2013
Clare ( whoever he is!) sounds like a motivational speaker. He talks a lot but actually says little. I can't help but wonder if his clients share my sentiment? Maybe they just sign wherever he indicates and hope for the best.
Report Abuse
Added by AndreK, 20 Jun 2013
Who would like to go back to the corporate environment? A Independent is there for a specific reason, to be able to evaluate products without being held ransom by big companies, as previously has been the case. It is for the very reason they are independent. There is no such thing that we have to struggle to keep the clients interests first, it is part of our daily lifestyle, to put the customer first....... More people will leave the industry, leaving less people to be serviced and who can afford the services. My humble 2cents...
Report Abuse
Added by AZ, 20 Jun 2013
Here, here, AndreK, I totally agree. The truth is that one factor which promotes the professionalism strived for by regulators, is only forced down to certain roll players : Strong ethic values, objectivity, honesty, and an ability to serve, all going hand in hand with the customer's interest first, BUT directly opposes what the big insurance companies really wants form us : keep rolling the new business figures as hard and quick as you can, and bogger the after effects and quality of client services available form them !
Report Abuse
Added by Miffed, 20 Jun 2013
Yes, there are very real threats to IFA's most of which is located within the mountain of bureaucracy originating primarily from the FSB but also SARS, FIC, Treasury. CIPC and supposedly supporting bodies like the FPI. I find the Editor's closing thoughts that we would "struggle to put the client interest first" offensive. What is happening is that the likes of the FSB demand that their interest takes centre stage and it is the associated consumption of our resources in terms of money and time in meeting and attempting to understand every little sub sub section of some Board Notice (or risk suspension) that I find personally draining. I don't receive funds but I do render what I trust is accurate and professional advice yet now find my day consumed with sometimes petty admin. Of course this plays to the hand of the big corporates who can allocate a department to this function which is certainly why there has been very little opposition to all the FSB enactments over the past few years - sort of a self fulfilling prophecy whereby the big institutions will get their market back. A return to the LOA 1970's love fest if you will.
Report Abuse
Added by AVN, 20 Jun 2013
This article confirms the lack of understanding of people like Clare of what goes in an IFA business. Contrary to what he believes, a lot of us embrace most of the "shortcomings" he so eloquently points out. We are not interested to join up with the big league (which is what he obviously advocates) but want to remain independent as we find that clients get a personal service which is lacking in most of the big players. Maybe we need less of the big players to try and tell us what we should do as we as an industry do not need these sort of wild statements that in the end does nothing but running down the industry - while he is trying to further his own agenda.
Report Abuse
Added by AVN, 20 Jun 2013
@ Miffed - I missed the comment by the Editor. I agree 100% with you that it is totally offensive and it points once again to a lack of understanding. Maybe we should just unsubscribe from this publication as it gives me a feeling that the sensational is being sought at the expense of good reporting.
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Are IFAs ready for increased regulation, changing client behaviour?
quick poll
Question

COFI is coming, bringing a wave of change for financial planners. Which one of the following disruptors will have the biggest impact on your business?

Answer