orangeblock

Another take on the direct insurer debate

05 September 2012 | | Gareth Stokes

Over the past couple of months we have had many opportunities to reflect on the role of the traditional intermediated model of short-term insurance distribution versus the increasingly popular direct distribution method. We have commented on the irony of

The consensus is that the direct distribution model – and therefore direct insurers – is here to stay. And few will dispute that over time the bulk of personal lines covers will be “written” online or by call centre “agents”. Industry stakeholders are also in agreement that the direct insurers will battle to make inroads in the complex corporate insurance space. These facts go a long way to explaining why leading short-term insurers like Santam and Mutual & Federal added direct distribution solutions to their business models. Their respective decisions not to make “noise” about their direct insurance businesses at broker functions are understandable.

When Santam reported interim results for the six months to June 2012 it also announced that its direct insurance subsidiary MiWay had posted a maiden profit. The country’s largest insurer does not reveal MiWay’s contribution to its R9 050 million gross written premium in the half-year results – so we asked group CFO, Machiel Reyneke to provide some insight. He observed that the direct insurer achieved a net insurance result of R16 million (2.5% of the Santam Group total) from R500 million in gross written premium. The start-up business had approximately 140000 in force policies at 30 June 2012! As things stand Santam’s R4 389 million in corporate business is “safe” from erosion by direct “competition”. But the same cannot be said for the R3713 million (including MiWay’s R500 million) in premium written in the personal insurance category.

Going direct to protect market share

Will direct insurers eventually gobble up a portion of Santam’s personal lines business? To answer this question we must consider why the traditional insurers, who rely mostly on intermediaries to distribute their product offering, entered the direct insurance market, where the broker distribution channel is bypassed and product sold “direct” to the end consumer through call centres or via the Internet.

When direct insurers first entered the domestic market they were given short shrift by traditional market leaders. But it was not long before the industry realised their market shares, particularly in the personal lines space, were at risk to these new entrants. Their response – whether an affront to their loyal brokers or not – was to establish businesses in competition with the “direct only” companies. Santam and Mutual & Federal can now go about their business confident that their direct insurers will prevent serious erosion of their local market share.

Now the question becomes how to run an effective direct insurance subsidiary without stepping on brokers’ toes! The latest instalment in the direct insurer debate appeared in an article titled The Direct Distribution Dilemma, published in the August 2012 South African Insurance Association (SAIA) Bulletin. It explored issues around the direct insurance distribution channel...

Three ways in which insurers view the direct distribution model

The SAIA article comments on three typical insurer responses to the direct distribution channel. The first grouping sees direct insurance as an opportunity to innovate and search for growth. “These insurers invest in ways to use information more advantageously and bring innovative solutions to the market and lead the direct-to-consumer market,” the article says. A second distinct grouping is labelled the “catch up” crowd. Insurers in this category have not developed clear strategies for direct insurance. “Some insurers are concerned about upsetting their intermediaries in spite of the eroding value of the direct channel… They often approach the direct channel as a way to catch up with the competition rather than differentiating their value propositions”.

In the third camp we have insurers who believe their tried and tested approaches will prevail. “These insurers continue to depend on the personal relationships between their intermediaries and customers to win in the market,” notes the article.

Consumers will tilt the scales in favour of direct insurers

It is difficult for short-term insurance brokers to come to terms with traditional insurers’ move into the direct insurance space. The fact is these insurers have no choice but to cater to consumers’ needs. If they refuse to enter the market then the “direct only” crowed will gradually erode their market share.

Over the long term brokers will be better served by the likes of Santam and Mutual & Federal if these companies retain their market share and trade profitably, regardless of their preferred distribution strategy. Brokers must make peace with the fact that MiWay and iWYZE (Mutual & Federal’s direct offering) are here to stay too… They should also appreciate that these “affiliated” direct players ascribe to the good and proper insurance taglines of their parent companies.

As Santam, Mutual & Federal and other traditional players in the short-term and long-term space go the direct route, they need to consider the following eight “rules” for successful direct insurance offerings (included here from the SAIA article, with slight modification):

1. Be deliberate: Companies must be decisive about the direction of and their commitment to direct distribution. They must understand the target segments and define the value propositions that will differentiate them from the competition.

2. Build “simple, fast and accurate” into the core offering: Customers want simple and intuitive ways to assess their protection needs.

3. Product simplicity: Product architecture needs to be simple to reduce the number of questions, trailing documents and on-boarding requirements.

4. Design for multi-channel from the beginning: The business design must address how customers can seamlessly navigate across multiple channels as well as how information and interactions can transition from online to call centre etc.

5. Build digital marketing as a core competency: Digital marketing, social media, mobile, and affinity are some of the strategies insurers can use to drive quality leads to their website and call centres.

6. Create pricing sophistication: Although insurers cannot compete on price alone, they still have to offer competitive pricing as part of their total value propositions.

7. Improve customer confidence in the purchase process: Customers often obtain quotes online but still buy through a call centre. Insurers need to find innovative ways to personalise the buying experience.

8. Test and learn before scaling: The direct channel provides an information-rich environment that allows companies to test new features and offers, and quickly adjust to consumer reactions.

Short-term insurance brokerages should not discard the above information. As the insurance industry shakes out there is no reason individual brokerages cannot create direct platforms of their own… Instead of commissions you might earn referral fees for introducing business to your preferred insurer’s direct insurance subsidiary, for example!

Editor’s thoughts: There are some in the industry who believe all personal lines business will eventually be concluded in the direct channel. This reality will force insurance brokers to migrate to the commercial lines and personal lines for high net worth individuals markets. The good news is this shift will not take place overnight. Do you agree that personal lines motor, household contents and homeowners insurance are simple enough to conclude without broker assistance – and are you shifting focus towards more complex commercial covers? Please add your comment below, or send it to gareth@fanews.co.za

Comments

Added by Gawie, 12 Sep 2012
I agree
Report Abuse
Added by Phil, 07 Sep 2012
At the end of the day, a good broker can still offer something a Direct writer will not. Service and advice. When a client phones a Direct market, the telemarketer will do all they can to sell him their product, whether or not it is "ideal" for him. And 1 phone call will get 1 quote. Deal with a good Broker, and you will get as many as 10-14 alternatives to consider - and advice as to which is best, and why. When you have a claim, your broker tries to MAXIMISE your payout in terms of the policy, a Direct market to minimise. You pay the Broker to advise you and assist in all the aspects of cover. You pay the same - if not more - to the Direct Insurer to pay for the TV, Magazine, Posters etc which try to sell their product to you. I would LOVE to know what stats the Ombud has on appeals on Direct vs Conventional markets. I have heard rumours that over 80% of complaints relate to Direct markets (who hold around 20 - 25% of the market). If this is true - and I don't know why he will not PUBLISH the figures - it gives another boost to the Broker market.
Report Abuse
Added by Overlord, 06 Sep 2012
I have yet to see a direct personal policy that I would prefer to my broker policy, cheaper or not. I have yet to hear of an attitude to claims that is better than the insurer I have - I am talking valid claims, not dodgy ones. My insurer looks for reasons to pay, it doesn't start an underwriting check going back 10 years or more in case I can be caught out. Underwriting was done at application. There will always be those who believe they can do it on their own - we've seen their financial management skills in the debt management stats. I sleep easy in the knowledge that I have a trusted friend at Aon taking care of protecting my interests.
Report Abuse
Added by Phil, 06 Sep 2012
At the end of the day SERVICE is still a major seller. A client who phones a GOOD broker will be offered the most cost-effective covers from a selection of a number of Insurers, with recommendations as to which best suits their needs. A Direct client is dealing with the one Insurer ONLY - and one product, which they are made to "fit", instead of vice-versa. One observation, though: I feel that the FSB is (deliberately, or just arising from their actions) - promoting the Direct Insurer over the Broker. Their restrictions of earnings, and more and more restrictive and costly-to-implement regulations make the Broker less and less likely to want to remain in the Domestic (and small commercial) market!
Report Abuse
Added by Trish, 06 Sep 2012
Though I am a Broker, I will respond from a client perspective in this instance. As a client, I would like the best possible premium, from the most suitable insurer, through the services of somebody who is going to spend valuable time explaining the covers related to my policy, the exclusions which may apply and what the Condition of Average clause means and how under-insurance can affect any future claim I may have. I would like to have the guidance and recommendation of a qualified person whose first interest lies with getting a legitimate claim paid - in FULL - as opposed to a consultant working hard to reduce my claim because they receive commission on the saving!
Report Abuse
Added by Elna Rudman, 05 Sep 2012
Gareth, I do not believe that personal lines insurance is so simple, it took me two pages yesterday to explain to a prospective client all the factors that is taken into consideration to determine vehicle premiums. The call centres we deal with of our contracted Insurers simply do not have personell at this stage that have the experience or knowledge of insurance to correctly advise a client of all the pitfalls, they read information needed from a prepared script - we know it and can advise purely by years of experience. Our experience as independant brokers also gives our clients the edge on successful claims. It would be an interesting comparison to make of how many complaints regarding claims are handled by the Ombud for Short-term by direct Insurers compared to Broker clients. I have to add that in my opinion it would not be in clients best interest to insure directly, we see that on a daily basis with problems they have with claims, underwriting and unfair premium increases that we sort out for our clients daily. Five complaints against Insurers were handled by our Brokerage since 2004 in assisting our clients that lodged with the Ombud with successful outcomes, need I say more?
Report Abuse
Added by Dawie Bornmann, 05 Sep 2012
I am from the old school when little regulation exists. Even today with all the regulation in place "BROKERS" still exploit the public. Like estate agents, 2nd hand car salemen and the like - there is no room for this kind of creature in a just society - just like al the American banks that got away with the most atrocious criminal acts - these guys - locally - are getting away with financial murder - take the time and study them carfully - the ones that are realy good raping the public have similar features - with little experiece you can indentify them a mile away. May God protect us from these people and GOVERNMENT.
Report Abuse
Added by Paul Kristiansen, 05 Sep 2012
As a Life Advisor I do not wish to comment on the merits - demerits to the consumer of making such important purchases from "cyber robots" often peddling less than the ideal ( certainly thats the case in the Life space ) however its time that there was complete transparency about the high marketing costs and call centre operations vs " the saving to the Policyholder " by "not paying commissions I wonder where treating the customer fairly fits in with all this ... Paul K
Report Abuse
Added by Paul Kristiansen, 05 Sep 2012
In addition to my previous comment - I forgot to include all the Online Google ad costs and print media - take Budget for an example - they have an advert on every other page in the yellow pages - but hey - they dont pay commissions and the call centres work for "free" Paul K
Report Abuse
Added by Humphrey, 05 Sep 2012
Compare u/w margins between conventional insurers and direct players (direct writers make an embarrasing return at the public's expense). Yes some will come down to having data to evaluate and price better (a problem for insurers with brokers using their own systems). A bigger reason for the difference however is coverage and claims paying philosophy. Unfortunately a direct client is often none the wiser that he has not received a bad deal from a direct player or that a rejected claim would have been paid by a conventional insurer due to an an experienced broker.
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

Another take on the direct insurer debate
quick poll
Question

Discovery’s 2024 data highlights suicide and motor vehicle accidents as leading causes of unnatural death claims. Which of these insurance planning priorities do you find most relevant in practice?

Answer