FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Healthcare
SUB CATEGORIES General  |  HIV |  Medical Schemes | 

High Court confirms right of CMS to order inspections cannot be appealed by medical schemes

14 July 2015 CMS

The North Gauteng High Court confirmed last week (8 July, 2015) that the decision to order an inspection into the affairs of a medical scheme in terms of section 44(4) of the Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998 by the Registrar of the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) is not appealable in terms of section 49 of the Act.

This decision by Judge J Tuchten follows after the Registrar appointed an investigator while acting upon section 44(4) of the Act, which states that if he or she is of the opinion that such an inspection will provide evidence of any irregularity or of non-compliance of the Act or for the purpose of routine monitoring. On 24 November 2014 the investigator requested certain documents from Bonitas medical scheme to obtain evidence of whether or not certain transactions were irregular and contravened the Act.

Bonitas appealed the inspection and relied on section 49 of the Act which deals with the right to appeal decisions of the Registrar. Judge Tuchten found that this section does not confer a right of appeal on Bonitas, or any other medical scheme, to appeal against an inspection order. He also pointed out that an inspection should rather go ahead rather to be stifled by administrative appeal procedures and that inspections against the will of the participants in regulated entities are the rule rather than the exception. According to Mr Daniel Lehutjo, Acting CEO and Registrar of the CMS, “This is a great victory for the CMS and especially for the Compliance and Investigation Unit as it has now been confirmed by the court that schemes cannot block or delay inspections by lodging an appeal.”

“The CMS usually acts upon information of suspicious or irregular activity while there are times when routine inspections and the statutory documents that schemes are required to submit point to a need for further investigation,” explains Lehutjo.

The Medical Schemes Act empowers the Registrar and the CMS to protect the best interest of beneficiaries at all times by ensuring the funds their schemes hold are truly used to the benefit of members.

Bonitas medical scheme has indicated its intention to apply for leave to appeal the decision.

The judgment is available from the High Court (case number 18491/2015).

Quick Polls

QUESTION

Which aspect do you think is most critical for the future success of financial advisory firms?

ANSWER

Embracing technological advancements
Rethinking fee structures
Focusing on inter-generational wealth transfer
fanews magazine
FAnews June 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Understanding prescription in claims for professional negligence
Climate change… the single biggest risk facing insurers
Insuring the unpredictable: 2024 global election risks
Financial advice crucial as clients’ Life policy premiums rise sharply
Guiding clients through the Two-Pot Retirement System
There is diversification, and true diversification – choose wisely
Decoding the shift in investment patterns
Subscribe now