KEEP UP TO DATE WITH ALL THE IMPORTANT COVID-19 INFORMATIONCOVID-19 RESOURCE PORTAL

FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Healthcare
SUB CATEGORIES General  |  HIV |  Medical Schemes | 

Covid-19 vaccine included as a Prescribed Minimum Benefit (PMB) says Council for Medical Scheme (CMS)

27 January 2021 Phoenix Financial Services Group (PFSG)

Despite the recent announcement by the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) that Covid-19 vaccines will be included as a prescribed minimum benefit (PMB), the procurement and distribution of vaccines do not fall within the ambit of medical schemes.

Government will be the sole purchaser of vaccines before allocation to regional authorities and the private sector. The first doses of the vaccines are expected to arrive at the end of January 2021 and the government has an ambitious goal of vaccinating 31 000 citizens a day. This is according to Phoenix Healthcare Consultants (PHC) - a subsidiary of Phoenix FSG – managed by CEO Clayton Samsodien.

“It is laudable for the CMS to announce that Covid-19 vaccines will be included as a PMB. However, we need to remain cognisant that although the National Treasury will fund the majority of the cost, government will look to medical insurance providers to contribute. This means that medical insurers could contribute to the insured and the uninsured, a solidarity principle in action,” says Samsodien.

PMB treatment is covered in full by medical schemes meaning that no member co-payment is necessary. The majority of medical schemes already have partnerships with pharmaceutical companies to deliver various forms of wellness initiatives such as screening, preventative tests, and flu vaccinations. It is expected that schemes will build on these partnerships to deliver vaccines to members when available.

The CMS has always argued for medical schemes to ensure 25 percent solvency to fund future material healthcare expenses such as pandemics. Schemes themselves countered this argument indicating that the high level of solvency was not required and could rather be used to reduce the rising cost of healthcare. Currently, schemes are sitting with an estimated R66 billion in reserves that could help all South Africans with access to vaccines and not just those that are members of medical schemes.

Says Samsodien, “The percentage of reserve funding of a medical scheme will have an impact with the other demographics of the risk pool like average age and pensioner ratio of members. The higher the average age of members, the more the likelihood of members with comorbidities that will need to be vaccinated earlier in the vaccination drive.”

Government has indicated that it will follow international standards and practice in terms of the vaccine rollout once secured. Front line health care workers will be vaccinated first, then essential workers, persons in congregate settings, persons over 60 years, persons over 18 years with comorbidities followed by other persons over 18 years, and then the general public. However, there remain numerous factors at play delaying the procurement and delivery of vaccines locally.

South Africa is a party to the World Health Organisation (WHO) COVAX facility. Health Minister Zweli Mkhize indicated that South Africa will be receiving vaccines from the following manufacturers:

• 5% from Moderna
• 5% from Pfizer
• 70% from AstraZeneca
• 20% from Johnson & Johnson

It is reported that approximately 34,5 million doses of Covid-19 vaccines have been secured. Approximately 40 million people need to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity. Important to note is that vaccination is not compulsory.

Government has also indicated that it is developing an electronic vaccination data system in partnership with leading multinational technology firms. This will include a national register of all vaccinated citizens, and they will be provided with a vaccination card.

“Looking at the proposed National Health Insurance (NHI), what the pandemic has done is to push the project even further down the road. It appears that NHI cannot be implemented by 2025 given the current economic climate,” concludes Samsodien.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

The offshore versus onshore debate has raged for decades. What portion of your clients’ discretionary ‘risk on’ capital would you consider investing in offshore equities?

ANSWER

Allocate per regulation 28
70% or more offshore; but consider rand strength / weakness when moving funds
70% or more onshore; JSE will outperform on a 3-5 year view
Take everything offshore; too much political risk
fanews magazine
FAnews April 2021 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Randsomware attacks... SA businesses' biggest risk
Know the difference - compliance vs ethics
Better business by virtue of Beethoven
The future of vaccines
Harmonisation of retirement funds
Call centres and the maze of auto-prompts
The next 18 to 24 months are going to be tough
Subscribe now