orangeblock

Keep your medical scheme for tax reasons says Resolution

14 May 2010 | Healthcare | General | Resolution Health Medical Scheme

Medical aid costs and general medical expenses are fairly extensively tax deductible and hard pressed consumers should not act too hastily when it comes to cancelling or downgrading their medical aid cover warns Resolution Health Medical Scheme.

Principal Officer Mark Arnold argues strongly that medical aid cover is not merely a nice to have and that, while cancelling or reducing that cover may bring temporary relief to the household budget, it’s in fact “false economy” that exposes you to potentially huge medical expense risk.

“Our basic message is retain your medical aid cover if it’s at all financially feasible to do so,” he says.

“While this obviously affects cash flow in the short term, a large proportion of medical expenses are deductible in a given tax year and it’s obviously far preferable to remain covered for medical costs until those deductions begin to filter through.”

The tax benefits for medical aid contributions and medical expenditure are straightforward and can quite easily be explained he points out.

The tax free allowance granted by the Receiver toward medical aid contributionsduring a given tax year, now amounts to R670 per month for the member andthe first dependant and R410 per month for every other dependant.

“This works out at a substantial R2 160 deduction pm (R25 920 pa) for a family of four, applicable after Minister Pravin Gordhan announced some welcome relief on the tax front for medical contributions in his Budget speech.”

In addition to that, the Receiver allows deducted against tax, your contribution that exceeds this total, together with the unclaimed portion of your general medical expenses (the amount not paid by your medical aid)where the total of those amountsexceeds 7.5 % of your taxable earnings.

Also, tax payers over the age of 65 enjoya full deduction for qualifying medical aid contributions and expenses while tax payers under 65 may claim all qualifying medical expenses where the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse or child is disabled. So taken as a whole, these deductions and potential deductions can be substantial.

“It should be borne in mind however that any contribution made by the employer on behalf of the employee toward his medical aid contribution, either by way of a subsidy or a salary sacrifice isregarded as income in the hands of the employeeand this has to be taken into account in your tax calculations.’

The exception to this rule is where a company subsidises low income staff medical cover in which case that contribution is still 100% tax deductible for the employee, resulting in a ‘zero effect’, tax wise for the employee. Other tax free exceptions apply where contributions are made by a company on behalf ofpensioners, ordependants ofdeceased pensioners.

“The fundamental fact is that medical expenses for individuals are already substantially tax deductible and maintaining your medical aid membership is crucially important against the background of rising medical costs and the questionable alternative of being reliant upon the State health system.”

quick poll
Question

If you had to hazard a guess, when do you reckon the COFI Bill will be signed into law?

Answer