FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Healthcare
SUB CATEGORIES General  |  HIV |  Medical Schemes | 

Blending National Health Insurance with pending legislation

30 September 2009 Gareth Stokes
Gareth Stokes, FAnews Online

Gareth Stokes, FAnews Online

Speculation around the shape and form of South Africa’s National Health Insurance (NHI) system is mounting. Opposition parties, health economists and medical aid members are watching each new development in a bid to piece together government’s thinking on the matter. Thus far we can only work with a ‘leaked’ ANC-task team policy document tackling the topic. The document, chock-full of grand social outcomes, pays scant attention to the financial, infrastructural and human resources the plan requires to work. Until we have an official ‘white paper’ outlining government’s national health proposals we remain in the dark.

Distracted by the likely rush implementation of NHI most of us have forgotten about the various legislative changes currently in progress in the healthcare environment. At the fifth annual Aon Healthcare Seminar, held at Aon’s Sandton head office on 29 September 2009, we received a quick refresher. Esme Prins of Benguela Health offered a detailed assessment of Legislation and the Pending Environment – particularly as it relates to NHI.

Tabled, but still waiting for regulations

The Medical Schemes Amendment Bill (MSAB) was tabled in Parliament last year, but hasn’t made any progress in anticipation of NHI. The key issues dealt with in the MSAB included changing the allowed business of a medical scheme, to restructure medical schemes benefits through the introduction of innovative benefits packages, to introduce a framework for low income products, to enhance corporate governance within medical schemes and to introduce risk equalisation. “They can either withdraw the MSAB and amend it, or proceed with the bill as it is currently tabled,” said Prins.

Proposed NHI solutions introduced uncertainty about the future of the medical schemes industry. Experts believed that government wanted to do away with the ‘multi-payer’ system and handle all healthcare purchasing functions through a single publicly administered NHI super fund. Since then the stance has moderated slightly as government realises it will have to consider the section of the population enjoying medical cover through the private sector. At the end of 2008 there were approximately 7.8 million medical scheme beneficiaries representing 16% of the country’s 48.7m citizens.

An industry beset by problems

The industry has its own problems. According to Prins, “financially – particularly looking at operating results – the industry doesn’t look well at all.” Too many schemes reported net deficits for the latest financial year. Prins notes that 41.6% of beneficiaries belonged to schemes that reported operating deficits in excess of R20m in 2008. This situation persists despite contributions per average beneficiary per month exceeding R800. “It’s becoming an expensive issue to have ‘good’ medical scheme cover,” Prins said.

There are three main cost drivers that impact on medical schemes affordability. The first is healthcare costs, comprising hospital expenses, doctors and medical specialist remuneration and medicines. R64.7bn was paid in healthcare costs in the 2008 year. The second is non-healthcare costs which include gross administration, managed care and brokers and other marketing expenses. Medical schemes spent R10bn on these lines last year. And finally, we have Prescribed Minimum Benefits (PMBs). Prins says one of the major problems faced by medical schemes is the manner in which PMBs are administered. The current system forces medical schemes to pay the providers invoice unless they can prove it is “excessive, unreasonable or unprofessional!”

Affordability is the reason there has been no significant increase in medical schemes coverage since the Medical Schemes Act first came into force in 1967. There are currently too few beneficiaries and too many medical schemes. The Council for Medical Schemes 2008/2009 Annual Report lists 119 schemes and nine of these have since closed shop or merged with other schemes. And there are a number of voluntary and compulsory mergers in the pipeline.

Medical schemes under NHI

We don’t know what the final NHI system is going to look like, but we can make some ‘educated’ guesses. “Medical schemes will be there – in what form I cannot tell you – but we probably know with the background I’ve just given you that schemes will have to be restructured to be part of the solution,” said Prins. To survive they will have to be competitive and affordable. Prins believes the medical scheme could even compete with the NHI under certain circumstances. What about other legislation?

The National Health Amendment Bill (NHAB) was introduced into Parliament in 2008, but has since been withdrawn. The bill proposed reintroducing central negotiations on prices between healthcare funders and providers. The NHAB also proposed setting prices on PMBs. The ‘central negotiation’ process is part of the proposed NHI solution. Prins says the NHI will probably create a central tariff setting function which could render the NHAB obsolete.

Editor’s thoughts: Recent changes in healthcare legislation could be at odds with the eventual National Health Insurance system. Whether the Medical Schemes Amendment Bill and National Health Amendment Bill are finally adopted probably depend on government’s preference for an NHI solution. Should ‘pending’ legislative changes in the healthcare environment be put on hold until the NHI solution is unveiled? Add your comments below, or send them to gareth@fanews.co.za

Comments

Added by ntombi, 03 May 2011
Please advise. Our company is considering joining a medical scheme for it workers. What are the implications of the National Health Insurance scheme? What is the latest on this scheme?
Report Abuse
Added by Jack, 23 Jan 2011
As medical aids come to the end of their contribution to your medical costs, you turn to the government to carry on, help, conclude. You cannot, will not and are never refused by these doctors, hospitals, medication etc. All is fair - therefore up the VAT rate and use capable, trained, experienced, professional financial people to run this side of the public money as a medical insurance fund, not up the food bills of all government jet setters. To up VAT is the only way that everyone in South Africa - passport or not - will contribute to the NHI. That will be fair - my opinion. I would say it is time the cost of the first world economy in South Africa is explained, understood, accepted, absorbed, honoured by ALL the citizens/people of this country - PDI, XPAT, POLITICAL ASYLEM, AFRICAN CONTINENT SOUTH AFRICANS, BORN SOUTH AFRICANS - ALL COLOURS AND CULTURES (rsa politics), ETC ETC ETC. Not again only the 7 million tax payers that will then be paying the 21st tax added since the early 90's. Tick tock tick tock tick tock
Report Abuse
Added by Cynical Simon., 01 Oct 2009
Every thing you say may be true and every argument put forwarded by Prins may be valid but unless Medical Aid Schemes are permitted to apply underwriting principles which of course is raw discrimination-scientific discrimination between who is insurable and who isn't they will never survive.Whether it is called N H I or DISCOVERY or GEMSTONE or DOWN-THE-DRAIN-SCHEME is completely immaterial.There is simply no magician alive whether his name is Barak Obamah or Cauly Flower Garlic or even Satan Lucifer who can ever make such a No-No abortion fly.
Report Abuse
Added by Sandy, 30 Sep 2009
We should never forget that the ANC and its alliance partners have a strong socialist leaning and that their long term plan is to level the various strata in our society. Medical Aid Schemes will become under increasing pressure and will have to fight for a place in that type of view. Private medical services are viewed as elitist and discriminatory, and will be attacked until some sanity returns about the position of the privileged in relation to the unfortunate poor. We really need to do more for the poor, but grand plans will not do it. South Africa has seen enough of the unintended consequences of govenrmental policies This is not really about the money - it is political. We should deal with it on that level.
Report Abuse

Comment on this post

Name*
Email Address*
Comment
Security Check *
   
Quick Polls

QUESTION

SA’s 2025 Budget appears unlikely to introduce major tax hikes, but bracket creep, fiscal debt, and policy uncertainty remain key concerns. What will have the biggest impact on financial planning after the budget?

ANSWER

Bracket creep
Government debt
Laffer Curve effects
Policy uncertainty
fanews magazine
FAnews February 2025 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Unseen risks: insuring against the impact of AI gone wrong
Machine vs human: finding the balance
Is embedded insurance the end of traditional broker channels?
Client aspirations take centre stage as advisers rethink retirement planning
Maximise TFSA contributions before year-end
Subscribe now