Will insurers and reinsurers ask for employees’ vaccination profiles at EB renewals?

07 October 2021 Guardrisk
Francois Schaap, Managing Executive at Guardrisk Life

Francois Schaap, Managing Executive at Guardrisk Life

With death claims soaring in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, employer and fund schemes offering employee benefits (EB) have not escaped unscathed and this is likely to affect pricing at renewal. That’s according to Francois Schaap, Managing Executive, Guardrisk Life.

“Current vaccine data shows that the higher the vaccine rate in a specified group, the lower the risk of serious illness and death and it makes sense that insurers and reinsurers will price accordingly,” said Schaap. With no end in sight for the pandemic, and yet another new variant of Covid identified in South Africa recently, Covid is going to be a challenge that insurers and reinsurers (and employer and fund schemes) are going to grapple with for the foreseeable future.

Schaap predicts that, “in terms of EB risks impacted by Covid, it is not inconceivable that insurers and reinsurers could start asking for employees’ vaccination profiles; and those entities that are able to extract this type of risk mitigating information will reap the benefits because it will be used to determine exposures and pricing, and assess underwriting structures.”

One way that employers can mitigate price increases is to self-insure their EB schemes, which allows for EB programmes to be customized according to prevailing internal and external risks.

“During times of uncertainty and volatility such as Covid-19, self-insurance of benefits through a cell captive structure allows for EB programmes to be structured periodically with different protection covers being offered by professional life reinsurers to lay off some of the client’s high exposures. Then, when normality returns to the market and the client’s circumstances, the self-insurance component can be increased again,” said Schaap.

There is a misconception that self-insurance means that the cell takes 100% of the risk for its own account. The degree of self-insurance depends entirely on the client’s risk appetite, claims’ experience and external market factors, of which Covid is one example. Most employers and funds may start their journey conservatively by taking minimal risk and then increase self-insurance levels as they get comfortable with the concept and as reserves grow.

Reliable updated data lies at the heart of the cell captive model; the more data that is available regarding the risk profile and claims experience, the more accurately the risk can be priced. This determines self-insurance appetite and, when outsourced, often leads to lower rates.

Quick Polls


The second draft amendments to Regulation 28 will allow retirement funds to allocate up to 45% of their assets to SA infrastructure, with a further 10% for rest of Africa; but the equity & offshore caps remain unchanged. What are your thoughts on the proposal?


Infrastructure? You mean cash returns with higher risk!?!
Infrastructure cap is way too high
Offshore limit still needs to be raised
Who cares… Reg 28 does not apply to discretionary savings
fanews magazine
FAnews November 2021 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

New proposals to amend PPRs have major impact
The untold truth about intermediary agreements
Rethinking claims
Tik-Tok: The clock is ticking on SA’s R45 billion unclaimed benefits bomb
Medical schemes’ average increases for 2022
Disability claims aggregation
Subscribe now