KEEP UP TO DATE WITH ALL THE IMPORTANT COVID-19 INFORMATIONCOVID-19 RESOURCE PORTAL
FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Economy
SUB CATEGORIES General |  Budget 2017 |  Budget 2018 |  Budget 2019 |  Budget 2020 |  Budget 2021 | 

VAT increase unavoidable – Allan Gray

23 February 2018 Carla Rossouw, Allan Gray
Carla Rossouw, tax manager at Allan Gray.

Carla Rossouw, tax manager at Allan Gray.

The Budget Speech delivered by Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba was a careful step in the right direction in an environment where hard decisions are imperative.

This is the view of Carla Rossouw, tax manager at Allan Gray, who says given the country’s stretched finances, without big cost cuts the minister had little choice but to increase VAT.

“A decade ago, our budget speeches often included a tax decrease. This time, faced with a pressing revenue shortfall, no political appetite for big cuts in spending, state companies needing bail-outs and demands for new benefits like free tertiary education, the minister had little practical choice but to increase taxes in some way,” she says.

“The three big sources of tax revenue in South Africa are personal tax, corporate tax and VAT. South Africa’s corporate income tax rate compared to our international peers is already high, so to increase this further would push investments to countries with more attractive rates. There also isn’t much space to increase personal tax rates, since these incentivise people to be more tax efficient, and the disappointing net revenue gains to SARS from the last big increase showed that this is already happening. A moderate VAT increase, along with a commitment to more efficient government, gives us the best chance to get back on track.”

“It is helpful that basic food is not VAT-able, and that the impact on the poor was further reduced by providing an above-inflation increase in social grants,” says Rossouw.

She says that there is a continued focus on generating revenue from wealthy individuals: The Budget announced no adjustments to personal income tax brackets for higher-income individuals, an increase in excise duties on luxury goods and higher estate duties for wealthy individuals.

“While South Africa has a progressive tax system, the reality is that continuously increasing tax rates is not a sustainable solution. The government needs to grow the economy, expand the tax base and reduce wasteful expenditure by government departments.”

Below Rossouw summarises the main take-outs from the Budget:

• The VAT rate hike to 15% increases the cost of living for all households, but zero rating of certain basic foods does reduce the impact on the poor as well as above-inflation increase in social grants. Taking zero rated goods into consideration, VAT becomes slightly progressive, that is, higher-income earners pay a slightly higher proportion of income on VAT. The percentage point increase in VAT is expected to raise R22.9 billion.
• Estate duty was increased to 25% for the dutiable value of an estate above R30 million, with a rate of 20% on the first R30 million. This is in line with the Davis Tax Committee’s recommendations and in keeping with the progressive structure of the tax system.
• To limit the staggering of donations to avoid the higher estate duty, any donations exceeding R30 million in one tax year will be taxed at a rate of 25%, with a rate of 20% on the first R30 million.
• A below inflation increase in the bottom three personal income tax brackets and no inflation adjustment to the top four tax brackets.

Rossouw says that that this year’s Budget was more radical than previous years, setting the right tone to address the current budget shortfall of R48.2 billion in 2017/2018, which is slightly lower than the R50.8 billion projected in the 2017 Medium Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS).

“The tax policy proposals are designed to raise R36 billion in additional revenue for the 2018/2019 fiscal, mainly through the VAT and personal income tax rebates and brackets.

“In short, the Budget reflects progress and it appears that the proposals outlined by the Minister continue to protect the progressive nature of the country’s tax regime but the true impact on the poor and most vulnerable in our society must still be determined ,” concludes Rossouw.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

The second draft amendments to Regulation 28 will allow retirement funds to allocate up to 45% of their assets to SA infrastructure, with a further 10% for rest of Africa; but the equity & offshore caps remain unchanged. What are your thoughts on the proposal?

ANSWER

Infrastructure? You mean cash returns with higher risk!?!
Infrastructure cap is way too high
Offshore limit still needs to be raised
Who cares… Reg 28 does not apply to discretionary savings
fanews magazine
FAnews November 2021 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

New proposals to amend PPRs have major impact
The untold truth about intermediary agreements
Rethinking claims
Tik-Tok: The clock is ticking on SA’s R45 billion unclaimed benefits bomb
Medical schemes’ average increases for 2022
Disability claims aggregation
Subscribe now