orangeblock

Is your foreign company worth the paper it’s written on?

18 September 2020 | Compliance - Regulatory | General | Sovereign Trust

Rone Silke, Consultant at Sovereign Trust

Economic substance has become a major buzzword for companies doing business in other countries – but many South African companies have yet to make the necessary adjustments to their international structure to ensure compliance, more than 18 months after the regulations came into force.

This warning comes from Sovereign Trust’s Rone Silke, who says companies that do not comply with economic substance regulations face the risk of fines or even deregistration.

The economic substance requirements are a result of the European Union’s strategy to ensure effective taxation. This allows the EU to recognise and identify jurisdictions not practicing good tax governance, and which are seen as high-risk jurisdictions for tax avoidance. As a result, companies operating in certain jurisdictions must prove that they are operating legitimately, and not as a tax avoidance mechanism.

“At the core of economic substance is the actual activity and effective role that a company plays in a foreign country. The key question is this: does your foreign company have proper substance in the jurisdiction where it has been incorporated, or where the company is tax resident, or is it merely an empty shell to house a foreign business, from which you reap the benefits?” says Silke.

The process started in 2017, when the EU assessed 92 non-EU countries against three key factors: tax transparency, fair taxation, and compliance with anti-base erosion and profit shifting measures. The aim was to determine if these jurisdictions were facilitating foreign structures or arrangements aimed at attracting profits which do not reflect real economic activity. The countries listed included Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, Turks & Caicos Islands, United Arab Emirates, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. To move off the EU ‘grey list’, many of these jurisdictions committed to introduce substance legislation and regulations by December 2018, with the new EU regulations coming into effect in January 2019.

“Although each jurisdiction has its own variation of substance legislation, the core principles remain the same. Economic substance requirements apply to companies carrying out ‘relevant activities’ in these jurisdictions, including holding companies, intellectual property, distribution and service centres, banking, fund management, finance and leasing,” says Silke.

The 3 key stages of the EU requirements are:
• Is the company a tax resident company?
• Does it conduct a relevant activity?
• Does it pass the adequacy test?

“The test looks at whether the company is being directed and managed in the applicable jurisdiction, if its core income generating activities are conducted in the jurisdiction, and if the company has adequate people, premises and expenditure in the jurisdiction concerned,” says Silke.

Once substance is established in a certain jurisdiction, the company should file an annual substance report with the relevant authority. The consequences to comply with substance requirements differs from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but include fines, removal from the register, or even imprisonment for failure to pay fines.

“If your company provides a relevant activity, but fails to create local substance, then it may be that the company would benefit from being a tax resident in another jurisdiction,” she says.

 

Is your foreign company worth the paper it’s written on?
quick poll
Question

The FSCA remains adamant that the multi-year delay in enacting the COFI Bill will not derail its regulatory strategy. How do you feel about the long wait?

Answer