orangeblock

CIPRO embarks on deregistration by stealth

25 May 2010 | Compliance - Regulatory | General | Gareth Stokes

Don’t be surprised if your close corporation or company has been deregistered by the Companies and Intellectual Properties Registration Office (CIPRO). In Practice Note 6 of 2009 CIPRO publishes a stern warning to CCs and companies that fail to submit annual returns. They say failure to comply (by month-end of the month following your company’s CIPRO registration anniversary date) will result in your company being summarily deregistered. Forget warnings or reminder notices, your company will simply ‘disappear’ from the register. Is this serious enough for your liking? The future of your business lies in the hand of a division of the Department of Trade and Industry (dti). CIPRO has the power to disintegrate your company if you fail to send in a form confirming your company details and the rand value of your latest financial year turnover.

The organisation has been in the news for all the wrong reasons of late. They’ve been lambasted for administrative efficiencies and tender irregularities, with allegations of the latter resulting in the suspension of CIPRO chief executive, Keith Sendwe, and his head of information, Michael Twum-Darko.

What is the annual return?

The decision to require all companies and close corporations to submit an annual return was initially dismissed as little more than a fund raising initiative – yet another ‘tax’ on an already overburdened private sector. This argument was underpinned by the rather nonsensical data component of the annual report. CIPRO notes: “An annual return contains a summary of the latest information of an entity which should be received by CIPRO at least once a year…” But essentially, in the absence of other ‘change’ notifications, this submission is merely a confirmation that your business is still open for business.

“Annual returns must be lodged within the anniversary month of an entity’s incorporation, up until the end of the month thereafter.” So, if you ‘incorporate’ or register a new company in May 2010, your anniversary month will be May 2011 and every May thereafter. Your first annual return must be lodged between 1 May and 30 June 2011 – and in the same period each year thereafter. Many businesses have failed to submit these annual returns, and CIPRO has decided to play hardball.

And now for the ‘scare’ tactics!

Practice Note 106 of 2009, Annual Returns for Companies and Close Corporations was published to “assist customers with the lodgement of annual returns and the associated administrative processes.” But apart from a few reminders about the required steps companies must take to ensure compliance, the circular is full of bluntly worded threats.

CIPRO notes: Failure to lodge annual returns within the specified two-month period will result in a penalty fee being levied. Further failure to pay within a further period of six months will result in deregistration of the entity. The final deregistration of an entity means the withdrawal of its status as a separate legal entity. As it no longer exists it will be unable to function or transact within the economy. Further, the directors or members of the entity may be held personally liable to creditors for all outstanding liabilities, including mortgage bonds and other debts since all legal responsibilities remain fully enforceable as though the entity has not been deregistered. Lastly, all assets are forfeited to the state in terms of the common law principle and practice of bona vacantia.

We’re not legal specialists; but the above sounds suspect. As if to confirm the ridiculous nature of their threat, CIPRO follows the above with a more conciliatory piece: If an entity has been placed in deregistration due to its failure to comply with annual returns, the entity may continue to lodge its annual returns while in deregistration (special exemption from normal practice granted) without bringing a written application or objection to the Registrar. The system will automatically take the entity out of deregistration and restore it back to active. If the entity has been placed in deregistration due to another reason a written application or objection must be made to the Registrar for cancellation… They then describe how companies can have such deregistration rescinded, including a number of administrative hurdles and, of course, another R150 re-instatement fee.

Another ‘body of state’ specialising in problem transfer

Your annual return is only received once CIPRO has both return and payment. And they make it clear the onus is on you to ensure they have both. Their latest Practice Note suggests compliance could be tough. “Customers are strongly advised to lodge annual returns at the beginning of the due period… to limit possible inconvenience or problems that may be experienced during lodgement due to high volumes of compliance.” And of course you shouldn’t deposit your annual returns dues during the last two days of the month due to possible problems with inter-bank allocations of money to CIPRO… Further to this – lodgement can only be processed electronically online. Many have complained about this …

How much will it cost you? If your turnover is less than R10m then close corporations pay R100, private and incorporated companies R450, public companies R4000 and external companies R4000. The amount grows incrementally for higher turnover companies… Our advice to companies is to comply with the annual return requirement regardless of how pointless the process seems. The R100, R450 or R4000 per annum is a snip compared to the problems you could face for non-compliance.

Editor’s thoughts: We followed our own advice and submitted an annual return for on of our CCs over the week end. After a number of attempts (CIPRO wants your CC name and registration number exactly as reflected on their records) we finally stumbled on the payment verification stage. Credit card payments are validated during working hours only. We’d love to hear your comments on recent dealings with CIPRO? Add your comment below, or send it to gareth@fanews.co.za

Comments

Added by tsholo, 18 Sep 2013
i am trying to find out how i can keep my company active but i do not know how. i want to avoid it from being deregistered.-
Report Abuse
Added by Ngwane-MP, 05 Oct 2011
I have just realised that my company which i opened in 2006 is in the process of being deregisterd, what steps must i take to re-register the company. Someone, anyone please help
Report Abuse
Added by Ad Care, 08 Jul 2011
Never thought this would happen to me. We signed a lease on our house registered into a company. The lessee did not pay his rent in the second month, and after we wrote him a letter and get the sherrif to visit him he did a search and found out that we were deristered at the time when signing the lease. Therefore he stopped paying and claim back all his rent already paid. The company was restored in two weeks after we realised and been pointed out by the lessee that we were deregistered. The co was deregistered July 2010 and restored April 2011 Contract was signed March 2011 Does the contract still excist
Report Abuse
Added by Surprised, 11 Mar 2011
It was by pure chance I found out that my home which is registered in a cc, has been de registered and the bank told me that I would have to pay a levy to re register other wise my assets would be claimed by Cipro. "Apparently" Cipro did send a letter ... Still waiting to get it. How many poor souls out these who's homes are in a cc sit in the same situation, let alone read the Gov Gazette before going to be at night. Ya right .... is this another money making scheme??!!
Report Abuse
Added by Carel Buitendag, 01 Mar 2011
My Company, a Pty Ltd was deregistered as my previous auditor decided to quit his practise and returned to his previous salaried job, In the process he never forwarded the Cipro notices to my current auditors. The company was deregistered in 2008. I have subsequently applied for re -instatement, paid all the arrears Cipro Fees, complied with all the steps as prescribed by Public works and National Treasury such as advertising etc. I have received replies back from both departments stating that they have no objection to re-instatement and was told that the whole process would take about 6 weeks to be completed. Upon my query yesterday with the Dti I was told that I have to bring an application to the High court for such re-instatement. Is this correct? This is a property owing company. I look forward to your advice
Report Abuse
Added by homeless, 10 Feb 2011
If a home is owned by a cc which is otherwise dormant , and these clowns have now de-registered it. Who owns my house? If I die...? I do not read the gov gazette or cipro site so how was I supposed to know there was a levy to be paid? I believe from my accountant there are lots of us in the same boat. How can they open a window of exemption from transfer duty so we could transfer our houses to our own names and then at exactly at the same time close it by de-registering our cc's???!!!
Report Abuse
Added by Annoyed, 30 Jul 2010
Their service is so poor. When they were advertising about these annual return from the radio stations, they give us the call centre number whereas they know that they don't answer it. Why give the call centre no if there won't be any answer. that annoys me most about Cipro
Report Abuse
Added by Neil, 28 Jul 2010
The situation at CIPRO is a disgrace. They have been in teh news for all the wrong reasons for a long time now. They have made, what should be an easy process, very difficult. No more credit card payments, slow service and teh like. I am one of those unfortunate people who have now had their company deregistered "by stealth". In spite of the fact that I have made my returs and paid the fee in April 2010 they derigistered me early this month, July 2010. Now it is up to me at great cost time wise to petition them for a re-instatement. I agree with teh comments this is extortion..
Report Abuse
Added by Grumpy, 25 May 2010
DO NOT FOLLOW THE CREDIT CARD PAYMENT ROUTE!!! I did and it took CIPRO 3 weeks to allocate the funds to my "virtual" account. Doing an EFT is much quicker. And yes, don't expect a fast and efficient service.
Report Abuse
Added by francoisg, 25 May 2010
I'm an accountant and are submitting returns for clients on a monthly basis. The worst part is the fact that the website is down most of the time resulting in us having to submit returns after hours - obviously less traffic on the site. When it comes to the prescribed fee... it's extremely unfair to penalise a company having a large turnover to pay more than double / triple the fee when the annual return is exactly the same. I can understand the drive to remove "inactive" cc's and pty's from the database but why the large fees if we are doing all the work...
Report Abuse
Added by Nursee, 25 May 2010
Here is an email from another source regarding CIPRO: From: Scott Cundill (Majestic) [mailto:hownot@majesticinteractive.co.za] Sent: 17/05/2010 07:47 PM To: admin@candidconsulting.co.za Subject: CIPRO scam! As you may know Nursee, CIPRO has been in plenty hot water regarding accusations of fraud. However, there is something else that you personally need to check up on urgently. My bank informed me last week that, according to CIPRO, Majestic is in the process of being de-registered. I was shocked. WHAT??? It turns out that a new law was passed a couple of years ago that allowed CIPRO to charge every company in the country an annual re-registration fee. It has now gone up to R400 per CC. My opinion: this is a complete money laundering scam. It may be legal, but it's a scam none the less. However, my conspiracy theories aside, if you have not paid, your company is automatically listed as being "in the process of de-registration." Can you believe these guys??? And just TRY and get hold of them. Their entire systems have shut down - you can't even access their website properly. My bank told me that this is happening to thousands of their customers. Quite simply, if you haven't paid your blood money and a large company or bank checks up on you, get ready for a shock. They may well refuse to do business with you. Suggest you investigate. I don't know how you can investigate, but all company owners should be aware. Scott
Report Abuse
Added by Dan, 25 May 2010
Surely this legislation is unconstitutional and should be challenged in the Constitutional Court. It is a bit like the department charged with registration of births and deaths listing a person as dead just because they haven't completed an annual return - a total violation of rights. I hope some sufficiently large entity takes them to the ConCourt
Report Abuse
Added by Feddup, 25 May 2010
The whole thing is nothing short of extortion. They threaten to destroy your business unless you verify already known information and the proceeds to trip up over ridiculously simple inputs - like the way in which the CK number is inputted etc. You also have to pay before you can get to the return which is the reverse of how SARS operates,. Then the website is often offline or hangs and when available is a navigational nightmare. They concede there are problems so they offer an exemption on the automatic penalty if you can't render the return in time, But has anyone tried to get the penalty removed - I spent hours - turns out you can't lodge the return until the penalty is paid and they still haven't returned the penalty despite saying they would!
Report Abuse

Comment on this Post

Name*

Email Address*

Comment*

CIPRO embarks on deregistration by stealth
quick poll
Question

How concerned are you that your clients might fall for deepfake or other AI-backed cybercrime scams, especially in financial or investment settings?

Answer