FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES

FSB on Fidentia – ‘crime doesn’t pay’

23 April 2013 Fiona Zerbst
Fiona Zerbst, FAnews Online Editor

Fiona Zerbst, FAnews Online Editor

For those who have been following the Fidentia saga closely, the Western Cape High Court’s verdict vis-à-vis J Arthur Brown – guilty on only two counts of fraud – may seem oddly anti-climactic, given that he was originally arrested on 197 counts. By negot

The FSB was naturally rather pleased, releasing a statement to the effect that the judgment has cleared it of wide-ranging allegations. Readers may remember that the FSB applied to have Fidentia placed under curatorship in February 2007 – the FSB claimed the company lacked proper financial or investor records.

“Throughout this time, the FSB has maintained that Mr Brown had a solid case to answer, the details of which would be uncovered in a court of law. It is also worth noting that for the duration of this trial, the Regulator and some of its officials were vilified; accused of things they have never done. In fact, so dedicated was this smear campaign that the Regulator was portrayed as one resembling a crime syndicate, among other accusations,” the FSB said.

It seems a Pyrrhic victory, though. The staggering losses incurred in this matter – including taxpayers’ money, it must be added – should make us all cautious about cheering too loudly. The curators, George Papadakis and Dines Ginwala, say they are assisting the NPA with various criminal cases where they are involved in prosecuting – meanwhile, their forensic accounting fees amount to R15 million to date: attorneys’ fees come to R5 753 847.72; counsel’s fees and disbursements come to R9 739 145.14 and the curators’ fees alone amount to R17 097 084. This isn’t chump change.

Many unanswered questions

J Arthur Brown said he ‘felt vindicated’ that he had been acquitted of seven other charges (what happened to 197 charges, one might well ask?). The FSB contended that being found guilty on two charges was enough of an indictment – it may be that the judgment has been met with relief given that some people thought Brown would ‘get away with it’.

One chapter has been brought to a close, but it is clear that there are still many unanswered questions. According to the Curator’s Report to the Court, dated 29 January 2013, R248 778 954 has been recovered and distributed to beneficiaries to date, but other cases are pending and the financial outcome of those cases should fall under the spotlight.

With regard to criminal prosecutions, Mel Cunningham’s trial is yet to commence, while Piet Botma’s trial has been only part-heard. Cunningham has been charged with fraud arising from the sale of Infinity to Fidentia (it has now been sold with the approval of the FSB), and the Asset Forfeiture Unit has taken control of Cunningham’s estate. The Santé Hotel Wellness and Conference Centre still poses a challenge as the previous tenant has yet to be interrogated before the Master of the High Court.

Many Fidentia investors are still waiting for their money, after a gruelling six years. It was bad enough watching Brown splashing out on SUVs and properties with investors’ money; but with Brown no longer the focus of investigations, investors must watch the slow-motion slaying of a veritable hydra – a many-headed beast of a matter, that will not be fully wound up any time soon. The entire shameful chapter seems to suggest that, even if crime doesn’t pay, it certainly doesn’t pay out, either.

Editor’s thoughts: Do you think the beneficiaries will ever receive the monies owed to them? Comment below or email fiona@fanews.co.za.

Comments

Added by rolene, 23 Apr 2013
With all the fees and fees within fees, amounting to R15m Plus, and ongoing, beneficiaries will be lucky to receive all their invested monies what to say the interest and income they were supposed to derive from this venture
Report Abuse
Added by Sharemax, 23 Apr 2013
Eleven years done the road and since September 2010 no income has been paid to investors who did business through Sharemax ! Sharemax ‘nothing but a Ponzi scheme’ February 1 2013 at 08:00am By Roy Cokayne Independent Newspapers The Villa mall by developer |Capicol was promoted by Sharemax, along with Zambezi Retail Park, which the financial |services ombud says is 'nothing more than a Ponzi scheme'. Photo: Simphiwe Mbokazi. Related Stories • Hawks look into fraud claims at Sharemax • Sharemax faces probe for Banks Act breach • Sharemax used investors’ money to buy ‘empty companies with no value’ • Adviser told to refund pensioner’s Sharemax investment South African Sharemax fraud: legally threatened chapters from Deon Bosson's Public Interest Warriors, 2008 Unless otherwise specified, the document described here: • Was first publicly revealed by WikiLeaksworking with our source. • Was classified, confidential, censored or otherwise withheld from the public before release. • Is of political, diplomatic, ethical or historical significance. Any questions about this document's veracity are noted. The summary is approved by the editorial board. Release date September 25, 2008 Summary Deon Bosson is a South Africa investigative journalist and author of the book Public Interest Warriors[1]. The book is the subject of legal attack by the South African company Sharemax. See the archive and Mr. Bosson's site for further details
Report Abuse
Added by Fidel, 23 Apr 2013
Question :Do you think the beneficiaries will ever receive the monies owed to them? No I don't think so ! The FSB is a useless and toothless watchdog ! They with the Ombudsman need to have legal powers to follow through with criminal charges for all these and many other failed property syndication schemes. The buck is passed from one institution to another and by the time the SAPS gets to the case it's to late ! Investors do not have funds to take these guys on. Regulators should have the same powers as the court of Law after their investigations and should have prosecutors to follow through immediately instead of having it to be investigated again by the SAPS who don't seem to be jacked up to investigate these cases. Six years later and you come to some kind agreement with the NPA , just to walk free by making one or two admissions !
Report Abuse
Added by Fergus, 23 Apr 2013
Beneficiaries don't have a snow balls chance in hell of getting much of their money, if anything at all. Regretfully they were doomed from the outset. The judiciary system in South Africa is so pathetically slow that the those involved dragged this thing to its literal knees. And so with the mounting costs, time has fleeced anything that investors might have hoped to receive. Pity. Huge pity. All the FSB has achieved here is prosecution. The protection and funds of the investors are almost certainly lost.
Report Abuse

Comment on this post

Name*
Email Address*
Comment
Security Check *
   
Quick Polls

QUESTION

The latest salvo in the active versus passive debate suggests that passive has an edge in highly efficient markets, or where the share universe is relatively small. In this context, how do you approach SA Equity investing?

ANSWER

Active always, the experts know best
Active, but favour the smaller funds
Passive for the win
Strike a balance between the two
fanews magazine
FAnews October 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

The township economy: an overlooked insurance market
FSCA regulates crypto assets: a new era for investors
Building trust: one epic client experience at a time
Two-Pot System rollout underlines the value of financial advice
The future looks bright for construction
Subscribe now