FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES

FSB discusses twin peaks reform with industry stakeholders

07 April 2015 Financial Services Board (FSB)

The Financial Services Board (FSB) recently opened a discussion on the implementation of the Twin Peaks model of financial regulation, which will see the FSB become a dedicated market conduct regulator with an enhanced mandate for the supervision of conduct of business, market integrity and consumer education. A two-day workshop was held with key stakeholders and role players within the industries that the FSB regulates, to obtain their input on the FSB’s initial thinking on its new regulatory and supervisory strategy.

Jonathan Dixon, Deputy Officer: Insurance at the FSB, noted that some of the challenges of the existing system are that it has tended to be too compliance-based and reactive, often only responding to complaints rather than addressing risks before they result in poor customer outcomes. “There is a problem when a system is purely rules-based, as both companies and the regulator are then overly focused on ticking the right boxes rather than identifying what the real underlying issues may be. The bottom line is that the industry and the regulator need to become more forward-looking and pre-empt problems before the fact, to better enhance fairness, integrity and efficiency in the financial system.” 

Katherine Gibson, from the financial sector policy unit at National Treasury, noted that the reform is primarily focused on changing culture, not simply changing the rules. “Establishing new regulators is not about rearranging existing responsibilities; it is a complete change in focus. Twin Peaks is about developing a more proactive, pre-emptive and forward-looking approach to regulation as well as a common system that harmonises powers and toolkits that are available.” 

As part of the two-day industry consultation, it was highlighted that effective financial regulation can help support growth and development of the financial sector. The new regulatory body needs to work together with the industry to help them adapt to changing legislation and achieve regulatory objectives, but also needs the necessary “teeth” to enforce the regulatory framework proactively and effectively. 

A further point that was emphasised was the fact that both the industry and the regulator are moving towards a more consumer-centric focus, with recognition that the empowerment and financial education of consumers is an important part of these developments. 

Leanne Jackson, Head of Market Conduct Strategy at the FSB, noted that the regulator is aware that a degree of up-skilling will be required as part of the market conduct authority’s enhanced mandate, including a deep understanding of the business models of various industry players and how they distribute their products.  

“This new model will also include a consolidated approach to the development of the market conduct regulatory framework, ensuring that new regulatory projects are looked at holistically rather than via a silo approach to ensure a greater harmonisation of the current framework and avoid duplication or contradiction in legislation,” said Jackson.  

Comment on this post

Name*
Email Address*
Comment
Security Check *
   
Quick Polls

QUESTION

The latest salvo in the active versus passive debate suggests that passive has an edge in highly efficient markets, or where the share universe is relatively small. In this context, how do you approach SA Equity investing?

ANSWER

Active always, the experts know best
Active, but favour the smaller funds
Passive for the win
Strike a balance between the two
fanews magazine
FAnews October 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

The township economy: an overlooked insurance market
FSCA regulates crypto assets: a new era for investors
Building trust: one epic client experience at a time
Two-Pot System rollout underlines the value of financial advice
The future looks bright for construction
Subscribe now