Nedgroup Investments commentary on Fitch Rating: Nedgroup Investments Money Market Fund

20 July 2012 Nedgroup Investments

According to Ian Ferguson, head of Cash Solutions at Nedgroup Investments, recent research undertaken by Nedgroup Investments indicates an overwhelming preference amongst Corporate Treasurers for money market funds to be rated.

Eighty percent of corporate treasurers that responded to our survey stated that they preferred money market funds rated by an international rating agency. Investors gain an additional layer of comfort from such a rating, knowing that an independent, international rating agency has conducted a thorough review of the fund, the fund manager and the investment process,” he says.

Ferguson adds that retirement fund investors in money market funds are less constrained by their investment guidelines, but trustees generally also prefer rated money market funds. He explains that this need of corporate and retirement fund investors is the reason that Nedgroup Investments applied for a rating from Fitch Ratings for the Nedgroup Investments Money Market Fund.

Following a rigorous process a 'AA+(zaf)' National Fund Credit Rating and a 'V1(zaf)' National Fund Volatility Rating has been assigned to the fund. Ferguson confirms that the rating will not result in any change to the way the fund will be managed.

“We are delighted that Fitch Ratings has recognised the high credit quality of the issuers to the fund as well as the fund’s low exposure to interest-rate risk and spread risk in the rating - supported by the fund’s short maturity profile,” he says.

Furthermore, Ferguson adds, that the limited number of high quality issuers in South Africa results in South African money market funds being more concentrated than their global peers. He concludes that in the absence of this concentration risk Fitch Ratings stated that the Nedgroup Investments Money Market fund could achieve a 'AAA(zaf)' Fund Credit Rating.

Quick Polls


Financial behaviour experts suggest that today’s risk modelling methodologies ignore your client’s emotional ability / behavioural capacity. What are your thoughts on spicing up risk profiling tools to make allowance for your client’s financial behaviours


[a] Bring it on; my client’s make too many irrational financial decisions
[b] Existing risk profiling tools are adequate
[c] Risk profiling tools should be based on the model / rational client
[d] The perfect risk profiling tool is science fiction
fanews magazine
FAnews April 2021 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Randsomware attacks... SA businesses' biggest risk
Know the difference - compliance vs ethics
Better business by virtue of Beethoven
The future of vaccines
Harmonisation of retirement funds
Call centres and the maze of auto-prompts
The next 18 to 24 months are going to be tough
Subscribe now