FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Tax
SUB CATEGORIES Tax | 

Tax return submission date looms

21 January 2008 Gareth Stokes

For those of you who elected to file electronic tax returns for the 2007 tax year the submission deadline is a mere nine working days from today. SARS has urged all taxpayers not to leave their online submission to the last minute, as the website is likely to be extremely busy the closer we get to 31 January 2008.

In the meantime SARS is struggling through a record number of individual tax returns. Earlier this year SARS published an update on the 2007 filing season, claiming a record of individual income tax returns for the period. A total of 3 million assessments were received and are being processed. By early January a total of 2.185 million (71% of the total) had been reviewed. SARS announced that 1.650 million of these had been assessed and taxpayers refunded (in the event a refund was due) or advised to make up shortfalls. A further 884 000 returns were in process while 242 000 returns contained information that did not match existing SARS information and were being investigated.

But many forms are simply not forthcoming

Despite the record assessment year, SARS estimates as many as six million returns (over a period of a number of years) are still outstanding. Estimates are that 23 500 repeat offenders account for 500 000 of these forms.

Many South Africans resist filing their income tax returns. SARS enforcement General Manager, Jonas Makwakwa told reporters in Durban last year that the problem was particularly evident in KwaZulu-Natal. A survey conducted in the province revealed a “lack of understanding as to why [people] should pay tax. The second thing [that emerged is that people] did not believe [they] were getting a service for their money.” The attitude was simply that since individuals were not receiving services from government, they believed they should not have to pay tax.

Unfortunately the government expects their slice of your income whether you are happy with the service delivery in your area or not. And that is why Afriforum’s recent call to businesses to withhold tax in the wake of government (and Eskom’s) failure to provide electricity will probably fall on deaf ears.

Massive number of errors

What concerns FAnews Online is the massive number of forms which were returned to taxpayers as incomplete or unsigned. SARS reports that 385 000 forms have been returned for a variety of reasons. It seems absurd that SARS could reject more than 10% of the total number of received returns.

Financial advisers report that reasons for rejected returns include not submitting your vehicle registration number, inserting a ‘zero’ or “N/A” in a field that should have been blank or not signing the return.

Taxpayers who submitted their completed returns prior to the 31 October 2007 deadline who have not heard from SARS fall into one of two categories. Either your form has been received buy not yet assessed, or SARS is investigating discrepancies between your submission and their records. Either way, SARS advises that if you have not received any response by 31 March this year, you contact them for further information.

Unhappy with the assessment

In the event you have received your IT34 form and are unhappy with the SARS assessment there are two options available to you. Either you file a ‘Request for Correction’ or you file a ‘Notice of Objection’. SARS has simplified these processes for the 2007 tax year.

A request for correction is “used if you made an error or omission on your return or if you believe SARS has captured your information incorrectly. It’s only one page and you don’t have to send in any supporting documents.” The relevant form is the IT12S. SARS will issue a revised assessment as soon as the information is corrected.

The objection form is used “when your information has been captured correctly, but you disagree with the assessment.” All you have to do is advise SARS why you believe their assessment is incorrect and they will subsequently evaluate the objection. The form to use for objections is the IT12C. Once this form is processed you will either receive a revised IT34 or be advised that the objection is refused. You are then free to follow the SARS dispute resolution process.

Editor’s thoughts:
Although SARS claims that everything is running smoothly, tax advisers responsible for submitting returns have two major complaints. The first is that forms are being rejected if they contain the tiniest error – and the second that SARS’s helpdesk staff cannot provide reasons for a form’s rejection. Have you experienced problems dealing with SARS in the New Year? Add you comment below or send them to gareth@fanews.co.za

Comments

Added by NG, 24 Jul 2008
I am sorry I EVER got involved in eFiling - after having the same problems as TM, I have now requested all future correspondence to be mailed to my home address. That is, if they ever get to read my email........sigh
Report Abuse
Added by Ken, 23 Jan 2008
Yes, it has been a major problem. I've submitted a total of 162 forms for my clients, of which 35 have been returned for the most minor things. That's 21.6%. SARS have offered us simpler forms, which is great but then get so very strict on the completion of the forms. I'm now struggling to get these clients registered and submitted on e-filing so that they can avoid the penalties. Some forms have only just been returned, after being submitted over 5 months ago. Just unacceptable. However, in general, I have found e-filing a pleasure to work with, especially with the IT12 forms. I'm having a huge problem with the EMP201's but that is not for this debate.
Report Abuse
Added by Platjie Klaasen, 21 Jan 2008
The facility exists to submit a tax form direct on the internet without first registering. if you submit the documents,you receive acknowledgement that they received it. If you can get hold of them they say that if you submit it like that,they never receive it. That is very disturbing as I am sure a lot of people has submitted their returns in this manner without knowing that it has not been reveived.
Report Abuse
Added by Johan Wessels, 21 Jan 2008
Another problem is that eFiling rejects or ignore all claims under travelling expenses and as a result of this all assessments with travel claims are incorrectly issued. According to SARS management the problem came under their attention in November 2007 and has been rectified in December 2007. I notified SARS that returns submitted on 12/01/2008 came back with incorrect assessments and that I am not submitting any further returns till the problem has been rectified. If the system does not work SARS will have no choice than to grant further extensions.
Report Abuse
Added by Ann Colling , 21 Jan 2008
I am astounded at the many mistakes made by SARS again this year. The assessments (IT34) have so many errors, some of which are: SARS omitted to take into account provisional tax paid by the taxpayer, trading imcome and expenses ignored, SITE paid not acknowleged (!!!), etc. In all the above examples the relevant declarations were made on the IT12s&C forms I agree with the practitioners that claim SARS sent forms back to taxpayers for minor problems. I have and still maintain that the new forms are not as user friendly as SARS suggested. Many of my own clients and others I have spoken to just find the new forms onerous.
Report Abuse
Added by Nico, 21 Jan 2008
The SARS officials are not up to standard and cannot help and identify how the form must be correctly completed.
Report Abuse
Added by TM, 21 Jan 2008
1. Despite having the latest Acrobat reader version, I could not open assessments. Two referenced calls later plus a fax to Girdhan (not responded to) the problem srtill exists. 2. Errors that are rejected do not exist. The sistems are picking up fictitious errors 3. The helpline does not pick up. Nor does the helpmail facility elicit any response to emails sent. ABSOLUTELY no response to whatever contact.
Report Abuse
Added by Pat W, 21 Jan 2008
I know of several people including myself who have had their tax returns sent back for the most obscure reason. In one case the lady had put a line through the Vehicle section as she does not own one, and has had to resubmit her form as she should not have put any mark there. The help desk person even intimated that she could face a late submission penalty ! In my case I have completed details in the vehicle section as I am a commission earner and they have sent my form back asking for me to complete my details with regards to my vehicle allowance. I do not have one and have never had one. A simple check on the system would have established that surely ? What a waste of time and postage and paper. After reading your article I gather that it will be months before these resubmitted assessments are processed !
Report Abuse

Comment on this post

Name*
Email Address*
Comment
Security Check *
   
Quick Polls

QUESTION

The industry must embrace AI as a tool to enhance expertise, not as a replacement for it. In a rapidly evolving landscape, value will be defined by the ability to integrate AI while preserving the personal relationships that set professionals apart. Success will hinge on balancing cutting-edge technology with human trust. Do you agree?

ANSWER

Yes
No
Balance is essential
AI this, AI that... pff
fanews magazine
FAnews August 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Women’s Month spotlight: emphasising people and growth in the workplace
The power of skills transfer and effective mentorship
Advisers and investors hold thumbs the GNU will restore bond and equity valuations
What are the primary concerns of insurers and brokers?
The Two-Pot System: regulatory challenges ahead
How comprehensive is your clients' critical illness cover?
Subscribe now