FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Tax
SUB CATEGORIES Tax | 

Clamping down on offshore tax dodges

15 September 2010 Tim Desmond Director - Tax and Commercial Departments Garlicke & Bousfield Inc
Tim Desmond Director - Tax and Commercial Departments Garlicke & Bousfield Inc

Tim Desmond Director - Tax and Commercial Departments Garlicke & Bousfield Inc

A recent decision by the Bombay High Court in India creates concerns for companies wishing to acquire shares in companies operating in that country. The Vodafone group had been challenging the Indian tax authorities’ attempts to levy tax on an international transaction that ultimately involved Indian based assets. The Indian tax authorities were successful and Vodafone’s resulting tax liability could be as much as US$2.6 billion.

It is common practice for investments into India to be held through foreign structures, in order to avoid Indian tax. The foreign structures generally involve tax haven countries. The Indian government has long been struggling to counter the tax loss arising from this practice. The court’s decision represents significant progress for it in that regard. The decision will also be of interest to other countries facing the same issue.

The case involved an acquisition by cell phone operator Vodafone, of the Hutchinson group’s interest in an Indian cell phone business. The acquisition was structured so as to take place outside India. The relevant assets were housed in a Cayman Islands company. The Hutchinson group’s 67% shareholding in that company was, in turn, held through another Cayman Islands company. A Dutch company in the Vodafone group was the acquirer. The transaction therefore involved the acquisition, by a Dutch company, of shares in a Cayman Islands company, from another Cayman Islands company. The purchase consideration was US$11.1 billion.

The Indian tax authorities sought to levy capital gains tax in respect of the acquisition, on the basis that the underlying operating assets were located in India. The business in which Vodafone effectively acquired a 67% interest was Hutchinson Essar. It is now known as Vodafone Essar and is India’s third largest cell phone company (by subscriber numbers).

The capital gains tax was sought from Vodafone, as the acquirer, on the basis that it Indian law required it to deduct capital gains tax from the purchase consideration. It is that capital gains tax that is apparently in the region of US$2.6 billion. The final amount may depend on whether the entire purchase consideration is subject to tax.

Vodafone has stated that it intends to appeal the decision. Its lawyers are studying the judgment, which runs to 200 pages. The court indicated that the Indian tax authorities could not issue a final order for Vodafone’s payment for eight weeks. This will give Vodafone an opportunity to consider its position and launch an appeal.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

Early 2025 asset manager outlook statements point to opportunities in emerging markets and the US dollar. How do you approach these factors in client portfolios?

ANSWER

Diversify across emerging and developed markets
Focus on long-term opportunities in China and India
Maintain a cautious stance around US-dollar investments
Prioritise local markets for safer EM growth
fanews magazine
FAnews November 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Understanding treaty reinsurance – and the factors that influence it
Insurance brokers: the PI scapegoat
Medical Schemes' average increases for 2025
AI is revolutionising insurance claims processing and fraud detection
Crypto arbitrage: exploring the opportunities and risks
Subscribe now