FANews
FANews
RELATED CATEGORIES
Category Tax
SUB CATEGORIES Tax | 

All we want for….Budget 2008

18 February 2008 Brigitte Keirby-Smith, Corporate Tax Director at Ernst & Young


With the 2008 Budget Speech this week, I am sure there are many of us asking ourselves “If I were Trevor Manuel……?” This question is particularly difficult, given the challenging economic environment facing our country. A reflection on the past year will reveal multiple interest rates increases, soaring fuel prices and a CPI annual inflation rate at November 2007 of 8,4%. And against a gloomy global economic outlook, this is not a pretty picture for the millions of South Africans struggling to squeak out an existence.

With the decrease in the rate of Secondary Tax on Companies from 12,5% to 10% (effective 1 October 2007), the effective corporate tax rate has dropped from 36.88% to 35.45%. This reduction is important for taxpayers that are self employed and who make use of a corporate entity through which to trade. In these instances, the option to draw remuneration (salary, benefits etc) versus dividends, if properly managed, can be extremely tax effective, given the widened gap in the maximum marginal rate of tax for individuals of 40% and the effective corporate tax rate of 35.45%. As individuals are taxed on a sliding scale of rates, this comparison needs to be applied with reference to that scale. The maximum marginal tax rate (of 40%) is currently triggered at a taxable income exceeding R450,000, while a marginal tax rate of 38% applies to taxable income exceeding R350,000. What this means is that once an individual taxpayer derives taxable income of R350,000, any additional taxable income would be more effectively earned if it were taxed through a corporate structure and paid as a “tax free” dividend. To illustrate this principle, take a taxpayer with taxable earnings of R1 million. If this amount were paid to him as remuneration, his tax bill (before rebates) would be R351,125. Through proper structuring (i.e. R350,000 remuneration and R650,000 dividend), the tax (before rebates) drops to R316,580, a tax saving of R34,545.

Clearly this disparity is one that needs review. Furthermore, where taxpayers qualify for the beneficial tax rates afforded to Small Business Corporations, this gap is even greater. For the majority of South African taxpayers that are salaried earners, there is no luxury of structuring their tax affairs in this way. So “If I were Trevor Manuel…..” I would carefully review individual tax rates, ideally narrowing the gap with the corporate tax rate or alternatively extending the thresholds at which that higher rates are triggered.

Quick Polls

QUESTION

What do you think the high volume of inquiries and withdrawal requests means for the future of the two-pot system?

ANSWER

It suggests high demand and potential success of the system
It indicates possible problems with the system’s implementation or communication
It points to financial stress among individuals that could affect long-term retirement planning
It could be detrimental to the economy and people's retirement security
It’s too early to determine the impact on the system’s future
fanews magazine
FAnews August 2024 Get the latest issue of FAnews

This month's headlines

Women’s Month spotlight: emphasising people and growth in the workplace
The power of skills transfer and effective mentorship
Advisers and investors hold thumbs the GNU will restore bond and equity valuations
What are the primary concerns of insurers and brokers?
The Two-Pot System: regulatory challenges ahead
How comprehensive is your clients' critical illness cover?
Subscribe now